World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Animal Science and Veterinary
France
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 54 474 435 10 10 324 12399

Cécile Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cécile Martin between 1951 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cécile Martin published across 76 years, from 1951 to 2026, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2010. 10 of the 524 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2010. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 1 publication 1955: 3 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1951 2026

524 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cécile Martin: publications per year, 1951 to 2026
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 1
1953 0
1954 1
1955 3
1956 0
1957 0
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 5
1994 11
1995 7
1996 8
1997 6
1998 0
1999 13
2000 4
2001 6
2002 5
2003 13
2004 11
2005 9
2006 13
2007 19
2008 18
2009 20
2010 35
2011 26
2012 20
2013 17
2014 27
2015 17
2016 22
2017 13
2018 21
2019 31
2020 17
2021 18
2022 23
2023 18
2024 19
2025 9
2026 1
Total 524
Download as CSV

Cécile Martin publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 324–328 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 324 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8 324
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Cécile Martin D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16 54
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in France Leader Award

Best Publications

  • Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range

    Gemma Henderson;Faith Cox;Siva Ganesh;Arjan Jonker

  • Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale

    C. Martin;D. P. Morgavi;M. Doreau

  • Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants

    D. P. Morgavi;E. Forano;C. Martin;C. J. Newbold

  • Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil.

    C. Martin;J. Rouel;J. P. Jouany;M. Doreau

  • Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output.

    Y. Chilliard;C. Martin;J. Rouel;M. Doreau

  • Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes

    H. Archimède;M. Eugène;C. Marie Magdeleine;M. Boval

  • The role of grazing management for the net biome productivity and greenhouse gas budget (CO2, N2O and CH4) of semi-natural grassland

    Vincent Allard;Jean-François Soussana;Robert Falcimagne;Paul Berbigier

  • Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database

    Mutian Niu;Ermias Kebreab;Alexander N. Hristov;Joonpyo Oh

  • The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review.

    Jeyamalar Jeyanathan;Cécile Martin;Diego Morgavi

  • Rumen protozoa and methanogenesis: not a simple cause–effect relationship

    Diego P. Morgavi;Cécile Martin;Jean-Pierre Jouany;Maria José Ranilla

  • Symposium review: Uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models

    A. N. Hristov;Ermias Kebreab;M. Niu;J. Oh

  • Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach

    J. Guyader;M. Eugène;P. Nozière;D. P. Morgavi

  • Potential use of milk mid-infrared spectra to predict individual methane emission of dairy cows

    Frédéric Dehareng;Camille Delfosse;Eric Froidmont;Hélène Soyeurt

  • Effects of stocking rate on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from grazing cattle

    C.S. Pinares-Patiño;C.S. Pinares-Patiño;P. D’Hour;J.-P. Jouany;C. Martin

  • Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep

    P. Mosoni;C. Martin;E. Forano;D. P. Morgavi

  • Methane emissions by Charolais cows grazing a monospecific pasture of timothy at four stages of maturity

    C. S. Pinares-Patiño;R. Baumont;C. Martin

  • Degree of Herbage Selection by Grazing Cattle

    W.A. Hardison;J.T. Reid;C.M. Martin;P.G. Woolfolk

  • Isolation and characteristics of the protozoal and bacterial fractions from bovine ruminal contents.

    Martin C;Williams Ag;Michalet-Doreau B

  • Additive methane-mitigating effect between linseed oil and nitrate fed to cattle.

    J. Guyader;M. Eugène;B. Meunier;M. Doreau

  • Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep

    Abderzak Lettat;Pierre Nozière;Mathieu Silberberg;Diego P Morgavi

Frequent Co-Authors

Diego P. Morgavi
Diego P. Morgavi INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Michel Doreau
Michel Doreau INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Maguy Eugène
Maguy Eugène INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Brigitte Michalet-Doreau
Brigitte Michalet-Doreau INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Anne Ferlay
Anne Ferlay INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Pierre Noziere
Pierre Noziere INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Yves Chilliard
Yves Chilliard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Angela Schwarm
Angela Schwarm Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Alexander N. Hristov
Alexander N. Hristov Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies, expanding your education online can open diverse career options. Many programs offer flexible, fast-tracked formats, allowing students to gain relevant skills efficiently. For example, you can study exercise science online to deepen your understanding of animal physiology and health, which complements veterinary knowledge.

Beyond traditional veterinary paths, careers in behavioral analysis are gaining prominence. Enrolling in accredited bcba programs offers training to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, a role that can intersect with animal behavior studies and therapy.

For those interested in the psychological aspects of animal care or human-animal interaction, pursuing a degree in psychology is another option. Programs such as nasp accredited programs provide specialized education that could lead to careers in educational support and counseling.

Additionally, exploring mental health fields through online apa accredited psyd programs with no gre requirements can broaden your expertise, enabling roles that support both human and animal wellbeing within clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Cécile Martin

Recently Published Articles