World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
82
Citations
34691
World Ranking
918
National Ranking
486

Alan E. Smith publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 158 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Alan E. Smith D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan E. Smith is affiliated with Sanofi in the United States. Their research spans primarily in the fields of Arts and Humanities and Psychology, with specific focus areas that include Literature and Literary Theory as well as Clinical Psychology.

Their work often addresses topics related to Spanish Literature and Culture Studies, Historical and Modern Theater Studies, and Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism.

Alan E. Smith has published in the venue Anales galdosianos, contributing at least one paper titled "Nota del director de Anales Galdosianos / [Editor's Note]" in 2020.

  • Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
  • Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism

  • Arts and Humanities
  • Psychology

  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Clinical Psychology

  • "Nota del director de Anales Galdosianos / [Editor's Note]", 2020, Anales galdosianos

Best Publications

  • A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location

    Daniel Kalderon;Bruce L. Roberts;William D. Richardson;Alan E. Smith

  • Defective intracellular transport and processing of CFTR is the molecular basis of most cystic fibrosis

    Seng H. Cheng;Richard J. Gregory;John Marshall;Sucharita Paul

  • Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis

    Michael J. Welsh;Alan E. Smith

  • Sequence requirements for nuclear location of simian virus 40 large-T antigen.

    Daniel Kalderon;William D. Richardson;Alexander F. Markham;Alan E. Smith

  • Processing of mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is temperature-sensitive.

    Gerene M. Denning;Matthew P. Anderson;Jane F. Amara;John Marshall

  • Demonstration That CFTR Is a Chloride Channel by Alteration of Its Anion Selectivity

    Matthew P. Anderson;Richard J. Gregory;Simon Thompson;David W. Souza

  • Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer transiently corrects the chloride transport defect in nasal epithelia of patients with cystic fibrosis

    Joseph Zabner;Larry A. Couture;Richard J. Gregory;Scott M. Graham

  • Expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator corrects defective chloride channel regulation in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells.

    Devra P. Rich;Matthew P. Anderson;Richard J. Gregory;Seng H. Cheng

  • Phosphorylation of the R domain by cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulates the CFTR chloride channel

    S.H. Cheng;D.P. Rich;J. Marshall;R.J. Gregory

  • Generation of cAMP-activated chloride currents by expression of CFTR

    Matthew P. Anderson;Devra P. Rich;Richard J. Gregory;Alan E. Smith

  • Gene therapy for cystic fibrosis

    Richard J. Gregory;Donna Armentano;Larry A. Couture;Alan E. Smith

  • Nucleoside triphosphates are required to open the CFTR chloride channel

    Matthew P. Anderson;Herbert A. Berger;Devra P. Rich;Richard J. Gregory

  • Mutations in CFTR associated with mild-disease-form Cl- channels with altered pore properties.

    David N. Sheppard;Devra P. Rich;Lynda S. Ostedgaard;Richard J. Gregory;Richard J. Gregory

  • Polyoma virus transforming protein associates with the product of the c-src cellular gene

    Sara A. Courtneidge;Alan E. Smith

  • Detailed Analysis of Structures and Formulations of Cationic Lipids for Efficient Gene Transfer to the Lung

    Edward R. Lee;John Marshall;Craig S. Siegel;Canwen Jiang

  • Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates the biochemical and biological properties of pp60c-src.

    Helen Piwnica-Worms;Kim B Saunders;Thomas M Roberts;Alan E Smith

  • PEGylation of Adenovirus with Retention of Infectivity and Protection from Neutralizing Antibody in Vitro and in Vivo

    Catherine R. O'Riordan;Amy Lachapelle;Cristina Delgado;Vincent Parkes

  • Cationic lipid-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the lungs and nose of patients with cystic fibrosis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

    E. W. F. W. Alton;M. Stern;R. Farley;A. Jaffe

  • Adenoviral vectors for gene therapy containing deletions in the adenoviral genome

    Richard J. Gregory;Donna Armentano;Larry A. Couture;Alan E. Smith

  • Expression and characterization of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.

    Richard J. Gregory;Seng H. Cheng;Devra P. Rich;John Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Gregory
Richard J. Gregory Sanofi (United States)
Michael J. Welsh
Michael J. Welsh University of Iowa
Seng H. Cheng
Seng H. Cheng Pfizer (United States)
John Marshall
John Marshall Sanofi (United States)
Joseph Zabner
Joseph Zabner University of Iowa
William D. Richardson
William D. Richardson University College London
Ronald K. Scheule
Ronald K. Scheule Sanofi (United States)
Graham J. Belsham
Graham J. Belsham University of Copenhagen
Luis Carrasco
Luis Carrasco Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa
Leevi Kääriäinen
Leevi Kääriäinen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in health and science fields can open doors for Molecular Biology students seeking flexible learning and diverse career opportunities. Many pursue online RN to BSN or BSN to MSN pathways, which provide advanced clinical and leadership skills valuable in research, healthcare, and biotech sectors. For those comparing program quality, the best value nursing education online wgu resource offers insight into affordable and reputable online nursing degrees.

If you already have a nursing background, consider fast-tracking with a bsn to msn online program. These bridge pathways are ideal for advancing your scope in molecular medicine, patient care, or management. It’s also vital to look for nonprofit online universities to ensure quality education and recognized credentials.

For military members and veterans, pursuing science and healthcare degrees online is more accessible than ever. Refer to the best military friendly colleges list to find institutions committed to supporting military learners with tailored resources and flexible study options.

Best Scientists Citing Alan E. Smith

Recently Published Articles