World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
63
Citations
14710
World Ranking
1805
National Ranking
905

William F. Morgan publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 171 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

William F. Morgan D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

William F. Morgan was affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with a specialized emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their scientific contributions covered several subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Epidemiology

The main topics addressed in their work involved:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Aortic Thrombus and Embolism

William F. Morgan's frequent co-authors included:

  • Matthew J. Budoff
  • Michael J. Blaha
  • João A.C. Lima
  • Erin D. Michos
  • Susan R. Heckbert

The scientist published extensively in several academic venues, notably:

  • Circulation
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • American Journal of Epidemiology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Association of Normal Systolic Blood Pressure Level With Cardiovascular Disease in the Absence of Risk Factors, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: The MESA Study, 2022, Circulation
  • Warranty Period of a Calcium Score of Zero, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Association of Age-Related Hearing Impairment With Physical Functioning Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the US, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • The diffuse-type gastric cancer epidemiology enigma, 2020, BMC Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response.

    James P Carney;James P Carney;Richard S Maser;Heidi Olivares;Elizabeth M Davis

  • Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro

    William F. Morgan

  • Non-targeted and Delayed Effects of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: II. Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Bystander Effects In Vivo, Clastogenic Factors and Transgenerational Effects

    William F. Morgan

  • Genomic Instability Induced by Ionizing Radiation

    William F. Morgan;Joseph P. Day;Mark I. Kaplan;Eva M. McGhee

  • Telomere dynamics in an immortal human cell line.

    J P Murnane;L Sabatier;B A Marder;W F Morgan

  • A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting.

    J. D. Tucker;W. F. Morgan;A. A. Awa;M. Bauchinger

  • Delayed chromosomal instability induced by DNA damage

    B A Marder;W F Morgan

  • Non-targeted bystander effects induced by ionizing radiation.

    William F. Morgan;Marianne B. Sowa

  • A Murine Model of Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome

    Bret R. Williams;Olga K. Mirzoeva;William F. Morgan;Junyu Lin

  • Is there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation?

    William F Morgan

  • Radiation-induced genomic instability and its implications for radiation carcinogenesis.

    Lei Huang;Andrew R Snyder;William F Morgan

  • Gene expression profiling after irradiation: clues to understanding acute and persistent responses?

    Andrew R Snyder;William F Morgan

  • Mitochondrial dysfunction, persistently elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and radiation-induced genomic instability: a review.

    Grace J.Kim;Krish Chandrasekaran;William F.Morgan

  • Persistent oxidative stress in chromosomally unstable cells.

    Charles L Limoli;Erich Giedzinski;William F Morgan;Steven G Swarts

  • Apoptosis, reproductive failure, and oxidative stress in Chinese hamster ovary cells with compromised genomic integrity.

    Charles L. Limoli;Andreas Hartmann;Lee Shephard;Chin-rang Yang

  • A Role for Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Perpetuating Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability

    Grace J. Kim;Gary M. Fiskum;William F. Morgan

  • Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase: a perplexing participant in cellular responses to DNA breakage

    James E. Cleaver;William F. Morgan

  • Sphingosine 1-phosphate preserves fertility in irradiated female mice without propagating genomic damage in offspring.

    François Paris;Gloria I Perez;Zvi Fuks;Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman

  • Characterization of a novel epigenetic effect of ionizing radiation: the death-inducing effect

    Shruti Nagar;Leslie E. Smith;William F. Morgan

  • Illegitimate recombination induced by DNA double-strand breaks in a mammalian chromosome.

    J W Phillips;W F Morgan

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Cleaver
James E. Cleaver University of California, San Francisco
John H.J. Petrini
John H.J. Petrini Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Sally A. Amundson
Sally A. Amundson Columbia University
Ralph R. Weichselbaum
Ralph R. Weichselbaum University of Chicago
Kenneth W. Turteltaub
Kenneth W. Turteltaub Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
John K. Wiencke
John K. Wiencke University of California, San Francisco
Andrew J. Wyrobek
Andrew J. Wyrobek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
David A. Boothman
David A. Boothman Indiana University
Nancy L. Oleinick
Nancy L. Oleinick Case Western Reserve University
James D. Tucker
James D. Tucker Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to various online degree options and rewarding healthcare careers. For those looking to move into clinical settings, there are pathways to nursing and advanced practice roles.

If you’re interested in a fast-track route, you might wonder how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner. Accelerated programs are available, helping graduates enter this high-demand field more quickly.

Registered Nurses can consider the rn to bsn online option, which delivers a flexible and efficient way to advance education and qualifications. Those aiming even higher may explore the rn to np programs online pathway, allowing RNs to directly pursue advanced nurse practitioner credentials.

For students coming from non-nursing fields like Molecular Biology, there are online direct entry msn programs. These provide an expedited bridge to a new healthcare career, making it possible to combine molecular expertise with clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing William F. Morgan