World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 63 1805 904 171 14710

William F. Morgan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William F. Morgan between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William F. Morgan published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 3 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William F. Morgan: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 4
1978 2
1979 2
1980 6
1981 1
1982 3
1983 5
1984 7
1985 11
1986 6
1987 7
1988 3
1989 6
1990 5
1991 10
1992 6
1993 8
1994 7
1995 5
1996 5
1997 4
1998 10
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 6
2003 9
2004 6
2005 6
2006 8
2007 8
2008 11
2009 2
2010 3
2011 19
2012 4
2013 3
2014 3
2015 2
2016 3
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 4
2023 5
2024 1
2025 2
2026 1
Total 240
Download as CSV

William F. Morgan publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 171 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131 171
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

William F. Morgan D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William F. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105 63
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

William F. Morgan was affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with a specialized emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their scientific contributions covered several subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Epidemiology

The main topics addressed in their work involved:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Aortic Thrombus and Embolism

William F. Morgan's frequent co-authors included:

  • Matthew J. Budoff
  • Michael J. Blaha
  • João A.C. Lima
  • Erin D. Michos
  • Susan R. Heckbert

The scientist published extensively in several academic venues, notably:

  • Circulation
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • American Journal of Epidemiology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Association of Normal Systolic Blood Pressure Level With Cardiovascular Disease in the Absence of Risk Factors, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: The MESA Study, 2022, Circulation
  • Warranty Period of a Calcium Score of Zero, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Association of Age-Related Hearing Impairment With Physical Functioning Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the US, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • The diffuse-type gastric cancer epidemiology enigma, 2020, BMC Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response.

    James P Carney;James P Carney;Richard S Maser;Heidi Olivares;Elizabeth M Davis

  • Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro

    William F. Morgan

  • Non-targeted and Delayed Effects of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: II. Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Bystander Effects In Vivo, Clastogenic Factors and Transgenerational Effects

    William F. Morgan

  • Genomic Instability Induced by Ionizing Radiation

    William F. Morgan;Joseph P. Day;Mark I. Kaplan;Eva M. McGhee

  • Telomere dynamics in an immortal human cell line.

    J P Murnane;L Sabatier;B A Marder;W F Morgan

  • A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting.

    J. D. Tucker;W. F. Morgan;A. A. Awa;M. Bauchinger

  • Delayed chromosomal instability induced by DNA damage

    B A Marder;W F Morgan

  • Non-targeted bystander effects induced by ionizing radiation.

    William F. Morgan;Marianne B. Sowa

  • A Murine Model of Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome

    Bret R. Williams;Olga K. Mirzoeva;William F. Morgan;Junyu Lin

  • Is there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation?

    William F Morgan

  • Radiation-induced genomic instability and its implications for radiation carcinogenesis.

    Lei Huang;Andrew R Snyder;William F Morgan

  • Gene expression profiling after irradiation: clues to understanding acute and persistent responses?

    Andrew R Snyder;William F Morgan

  • Mitochondrial dysfunction, persistently elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and radiation-induced genomic instability: a review.

    Grace J.Kim;Krish Chandrasekaran;William F.Morgan

  • Persistent oxidative stress in chromosomally unstable cells.

    Charles L Limoli;Erich Giedzinski;William F Morgan;Steven G Swarts

  • Apoptosis, reproductive failure, and oxidative stress in Chinese hamster ovary cells with compromised genomic integrity.

    Charles L. Limoli;Andreas Hartmann;Lee Shephard;Chin-rang Yang

  • A Role for Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Perpetuating Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability

    Grace J. Kim;Gary M. Fiskum;William F. Morgan

  • Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase: a perplexing participant in cellular responses to DNA breakage

    James E. Cleaver;William F. Morgan

  • Sphingosine 1-phosphate preserves fertility in irradiated female mice without propagating genomic damage in offspring.

    François Paris;Gloria I Perez;Zvi Fuks;Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman

  • Characterization of a novel epigenetic effect of ionizing radiation: the death-inducing effect

    Shruti Nagar;Leslie E. Smith;William F. Morgan

  • Illegitimate recombination induced by DNA double-strand breaks in a mammalian chromosome.

    J W Phillips;W F Morgan

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Cleaver
James E. Cleaver University of California, San Francisco
John H.J. Petrini
John H.J. Petrini Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Sally A. Amundson
Sally A. Amundson Columbia University
Ralph R. Weichselbaum
Ralph R. Weichselbaum University of Chicago
Kenneth W. Turteltaub
Kenneth W. Turteltaub Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
John K. Wiencke
John K. Wiencke University of California, San Francisco
Andrew J. Wyrobek
Andrew J. Wyrobek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
David A. Boothman
David A. Boothman Indiana University
Nancy L. Oleinick
Nancy L. Oleinick Case Western Reserve University
James D. Tucker
James D. Tucker Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to various online degree options and rewarding healthcare careers. For those looking to move into clinical settings, there are pathways to nursing and advanced practice roles.

If you’re interested in a fast-track route, you might wonder how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner. Accelerated programs are available, helping graduates enter this high-demand field more quickly.

Registered Nurses can consider the rn to bsn online option, which delivers a flexible and efficient way to advance education and qualifications. Those aiming even higher may explore the rn to np programs online pathway, allowing RNs to directly pursue advanced nurse practitioner credentials.

For students coming from non-nursing fields like Molecular Biology, there are online direct entry msn programs. These provide an expedited bridge to a new healthcare career, making it possible to combine molecular expertise with clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing William F. Morgan

Recently Published Articles