World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
77
Citations
18272
World Ranking
1119
National Ranking
89

Kevin M. Prise publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin M. Prise sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 388 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Kevin M. Prise D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin M. Prise sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy

    Unknown

  • New insights on cell death from radiation exposure

    Unknown

  • Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses.

    Unknown

  • Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts

    Unknown

  • Nitric Oxide-Mediated Signaling in the Bystander Response of Individually Targeted Glioma Cells.

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of cytotoxicity and radiation enhancement using 1.9 nm gold particles: potential application for cancer therapy

    Unknown

  • Non-targeted effects of ionising radiation—Implications for low dose risk

    Munira Kadhim;Sisko Salomaa;Eric Wright;Guido Hildebrandt

  • A review of dsb induction data for varying quality radiations

    Kevin Prise;Gunnar Ahnstrom;Mauro Belli;Jörgen Carlsson

  • The use of theranostic gadolinium-based nanoprobes to improve radiotherapy efficacy

    L Sancey;F Lux;S Kotb;S Roux

  • ATR-dependent radiation-induced |[gamma]|H2AX foci in bystander primary human astrocytes and glioma cells

    Unknown

  • DNA double-strand break distributions in X-ray and alpha-particle irradiated V79 cells: evidence for non-random breakage.

    Unknown

  • Cell type-dependent uptake, localization, and cytotoxicity of 1.9 nm gold nanoparticles

    Unknown

  • A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure

    Unknown

  • Cytoplasmic Irradiation Induces Mitochondrial-Dependent 53BP1 Protein Relocalization in Irradiated and Bystander Cells

    Unknown

  • Use of the γ-H2AX assay to investigate DNA repair dynamics following multiple radiation exposures.

    Unknown

  • Bystander-induced Apoptosis and Premature Differentiation in Primary Urothelial Explants after Charged Particle Microbeam Irradiation

    O.V. Belyakov;M. Folkard;C. Mothersill;Kevin Prise

  • Low-Dose Binary Behavior of Bystander Cell Killing after Microbeam Irradiation of a Single Cell with Focused CK X Rays

    Unknown

  • Calcium fluxes modulate the radiation-induced bystander responses in targeted glioma and fibroblast cells

    Unknown

  • A proliferation-dependent bystander effect in primary porcine and human urothelial explants in response to targeted irradiation.

    O.V. Belyakov;M. Folkard;C. Mothersill;Kevin Prise

  • The relationship between radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and cell kill in hamster V79 fibroblasts irradiated with 250 kVp X-rays, 2.3 MeV neutrons or 238Pu alpha-particles.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuel Salto-Tellez
Manuel Salto-Tellez Queen's University Belfast
Ian G. Mills
Ian G. Mills University of Oxford
Olivier Tillement
Olivier Tillement Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Robert C. Fahey
Robert C. Fahey University of California, San Diego
Carmel Mothersill
Carmel Mothersill McMaster University
Robert G. Bristow
Robert G. Bristow University of Manchester
Yasuyuki Taki
Yasuyuki Taki Tohoku University
Frank Emmert-Streib
Frank Emmert-Streib Tampere University
Robert W. Redmond
Robert W. Redmond Harvard University
Matthew Zepf
Matthew Zepf Helmholtz Institute Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Molecular Biology opens up a wide array of related online degree options and flexible career pathways. For students interested in behavior and mental health, an online master in clinical psychology offers training in patient care, research, and assessment. This can complement a molecular background, especially in fields like neurobiology or psychiatric genetics.

For those seeking roles in advocacy, outreach, or direct support, a human services online degree can be completed quickly and prepares graduates for positions in community health and non-profit environments.

Professionals interested in communication or working with diverse populations may consider how can a teacher become a speech pathologist. The skills of teaching and foundational science knowledge can be transferred to speech-language pathology, which often requires advanced study.

Finally, for learners fascinated by design and scientific structures, an architecture degree online can open doors to biotechnology facility planning or laboratory design.

Each of these pathways shows how Molecular Biology connects with a wide range of rewarding online degrees and evolving career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin M. Prise

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles