World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
68
Citations
20887
World Ranking
1500
National Ranking
761

Stephen Dalton publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Dalton sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 148 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Stephen Dalton D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Dalton sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen Dalton is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Physiology, Plant Science, Surgery, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work spans several key research topics, including:

  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Stephen Dalton has published in a variety of notable scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Nature
  • Nature Communications
  • Science
  • Cell Stem Cell
  • Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Dalton are:

  • Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes, 2020, Nature
  • Landscape of cohesin-mediated chromatin loops in the human genome, 2020, Nature
  • Perspectives on ENCODE, 2020, Nature
  • Replication timing maintains the global epigenetic state in human cells, 2021, Science
  • Human beige adipocytes for drug discovery and cell therapy in metabolic diseases, 2020, Nature Communications

Throughout their career, Stephen Dalton has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Michael Kulik
  • Reyes Acosta
  • Nicholas J. Addleman
  • Veena Afzal
  • Bronwen Aken

Best Publications

  • Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells.

    Karim Si‐Tayeb;Fallon K. Noto;Masato Nagaoka;Jixuan Li

  • Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment

    Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins;Michael E G Sauria;Amartya Sanyal;Tatiana I. Gerasimova

  • Transforming growth factor alpha: mutation of aspartic acid 47 and leucine 48 results in different biological activities.

    E Lazar;S Watanabe;S Dalton;M B Sporn

  • LIF/STAT3 controls ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency by a Myc-dependent mechanism.

    Peter Cartwright;Cameron McLean;Allan Sheppard;Duane Rivett

  • Characterization of SAP-1, a Protein Recruited by Serum Response Factor to the C-Fos Serum Response Element

    Stephen Dalton;Richard Treisman

  • Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types

    Tyrone Ryba;Ichiro Hiratani;Junjie Lu;Mari Itoh

  • Transcriptional activation by the human c-Myc oncoprotein in yeast requires interaction with Max.

    Bruno Amati;Stephen Dalton;Mary W. Brooks;Trevor D. Littlewood

  • Activin A Efficiently Specifies Definitive Endoderm from Human Embryonic Stem Cells Only When Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Kinase Signaling Is Suppressed

    Amanda B McLean;Kevin A D'Amour;Karen Louise Jones;Malini Krishnamoorthy

  • Preserving the genetic integrity of human embryonic stem cells.

    Maisam M Mitalipova;Raja R Rao;Deborah M Hoyer;Julie A Johnson

  • Cell cycle regulation of the human cdc2 gene.

    Dalton S

  • Functional analysis of a growth factor-responsive transcription factor complex

    Caroline S. Hill;Richard Marais;Susan John;Judy Wynne

  • Pluripotent cell division cycles are driven by ectopic Cdk2, cyclin A/E and E2F activities.

    Elaine Stead;Josephine White;Renate Faast;Simon Conn

  • Signaling Network Crosstalk in Human Pluripotent Cells: A Smad2/3-Regulated Switch that Controls the Balance between Self-Renewal and Differentiation

    Amar M. Singh;David Reynolds;Timothy Cliff;Satoshi Ohtsuka

  • Cell cycle control of embryonic stem cells

    Josephine White;Stephen Dalton

  • Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis

    Ichiro Hiratani;Tyrone Ryba;Mari Itoh;Joy Rathjen

  • Linking the Cell Cycle to Cell Fate Decisions

    Stephen Dalton

  • The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming.

    Amar M. Singh;Stephen Dalton

  • Wnt signaling and a Smad pathway blockade direct the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to multipotent neural crest cells

    Laura Menendez;Tatiana A. Yatskievych;Parker B. Antin;Stephen Dalton

  • Metabolic Reprogramming of Stem Cell Epigenetics

    James G. Ryall;Tim Cliff;Stephen Dalton;Vittorio Sartorelli

  • Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase

    Raman Kumar;David M Reynolds;Andrej Shevchenko;Anna Shevchenko

Frequent Co-Authors

Kelley W. Moremen
Kelley W. Moremen University of Georgia
David M. Gilbert
David M. Gilbert Florida State University
Lance Wells
Lance Wells University of Georgia
Ron Orlando
Ron Orlando University of Georgia
Jeanne F. Loring
Jeanne F. Loring Scripps Research Institute
Richard Treisman
Richard Treisman The Francis Crick Institute
Hang Yin
Hang Yin Tsinghua University
Robert J. Linhardt
Robert J. Linhardt Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Victor G. Corces
Victor G. Corces Emory University
Job Dekker
Job Dekker University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible learning options. For those interested in the quantitative side of science, pursuing a bachelor in mathematics online can complement a background in biology and expand opportunities in data analysis, bioinformatics, and research.

Molecular Biology also overlaps with creative and technical disciplines. Skills in digital visualization are increasingly valuable, making a graphic design degree online a practical choice for those interested in scientific illustration or multimedia communication.

If you’re looking for flexibility and broader career options, consider cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree options. These programs allow you to build a customized curriculum that blends science, technology, and humanities.

For those aspiring to advanced research or teaching roles, exploring the best online master's in history programs can be surprisingly relevant—these degrees foster strong research, analytical, and communication skills that are valuable in scientific fields.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Dalton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles