World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
26015
World Ranking
16060
National Ranking
8084

Robert E. Reiter publications per year

1954: 1 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 52 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 34 publications
1954 2025

475 publications in total across all disciplines

Robert E. Reiter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert E. Reiter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 443 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert E. Reiter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert E. Reiter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert E. Reiter is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant work in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cancer research, oncology, and radiation.

The scientist's publication record includes frequent contributions to several venues, such as:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • European Urology
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Recent papers published by Robert E. Reiter include:

  • "Prostate cancer," published in 2021 in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • "NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021," published in 2021 in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • "Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology," published in 2023 in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • "Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019," published in 2020 in European Urology
  • "The DNA methylation landscape of advanced prostate cancer," published in 2020 in Nature Genetics

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Matthew B. Rettig
  • Jérémie Calais
  • Nicholas G. Nickols
  • Michael L. Steinberg
  • Amar U. Kishan

Key topics of Robert E. Reiter's work cover:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Best Publications

  • Prostate stem cell antigen: A cell surface marker overexpressed in prostate cancer

    Robert E. Reiter;Zhennen Gu;Tetsuro Watabe;George Thomas

  • Inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN/MMAC1 in advanced human prostate cancer through loss of expression

    Young E. Whang;Xinyi Wu;Hiroyoshi Suzuki;Robert E. Reiter

  • Genomic Hallmarks and Structural Variation in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

    David A. Quigley;Ha X. Dang;Shuang G. Zhao;Paul Lloyd

  • Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial

    Wolfgang P Fendler;Wolfgang P Fendler;Jeremie Calais;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Robert R Flavell

  • Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) expression increases with high gleason score, advanced stage and bone metastasis in prostate cancer.

    Gu Z;Thomas G;Yamashiro J;Shintaku Ip

  • Progression of metastatic human prostate cancer to androgen independence in immunodeficient SCID mice.

    Karen A. Klein;Robert E. Reiter;James Redula;Hamid Moradi

  • Multifocality and Prostate Cancer Detection by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Whole-mount Histopathology

    Jesse D. Le;Nelly Tan;Eugene Shkolyar;David Y. Lu

  • Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT

    Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Ken Herrmann;Jeremie Calais;Boris Hadaschik

  • Value of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance–Ultrasound Fusion in Men with Prior Negative Biopsy and Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen

    Geoffrey A. Sonn;Edward Chang;Shyam Natarajan;Daniel J. Margolis

  • 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial.

    Jeremie Calais;Francesco Ceci;Francesco Ceci;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Thomas A Hope

  • Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies

    Christopher P. Filson;Shyam Natarajan;Daniel J.A. Margolis;Jiaoti Huang

  • Prostate cancer, version 1.2021: Featured updates to the nccn guidelines

    Edward Schaeffer;Sandy Srinivas;Emmanuel S. Antonarakis;Andrew J. Armstrong

  • Evidence for Clonal Outgrowth of Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer Cells from Androgen-dependent Tumors through a Two-Step Process

    Noah Craft;Chloe Chhor;Chris Tran;Arie Belldegrun

  • Discovery of New Markers of Cancer through Serial Analysis of Gene Expression Prostate Stem Cell Antigen Is Overexpressed in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

    Pedram Argani;Christophe Rosty;Robert E. Reiter;Robb E. Wilentz

  • Concordance of Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Metastatic Tissue Biopsy in Prostate Cancer

    Alexander W Wyatt;Matti Annala;Rahul Aggarwal;Kevin Beja

  • Monoclonal antibody targeting of N-cadherin inhibits prostate cancer growth, metastasis and castration resistance

    Hiroshi Tanaka;Evelyn Kono;Chau P Tran;Hideyo Miyazaki

  • LOW P27 EXPRESSION PREDICTS POOR DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER

    Ronald M. Yang;John Naitoh;Michael Murphy;He-Jing Wang

  • Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019[Formula presented]

    Silke Gillessen;Gerhardt Attard;Tomasz M. Beer;Himisha Beltran

  • Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy Boost and Disease Progression and Mortality in Patients With Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer.

    Amar U. Kishan;Ryan R. Cook;Jay P. Ciezki;Ashley E. Ross

  • CLINICAL AND GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA IN VON HIPPEL-LINDAU FAMILIES: COMPARISON WITH SPORADIC PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA GIVES INSIGHT INTO NATURAL HISTORY OF PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA

    McCLELLAN M. Walther;Robert Reiter;Harry R. Keiser;Peter L. Choyke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiaoti Huang
Jiaoti Huang Duke University
Anna M. Wu
Anna M. Wu City Of Hope National Medical Center
Martin E. Gleave
Martin E. Gleave University of British Columbia
Eric J. Small
Eric J. Small University of California, San Francisco
Owen N. Witte
Owen N. Witte University of California, Los Angeles
Tomasz M. Beer
Tomasz M. Beer Oregon Health & Science University
George Thomas
George Thomas Oregon Health & Science University
Christopher P. Evans
Christopher P. Evans University of California, Davis
Johannes Czernin
Johannes Czernin University of California, Los Angeles
Kim N. Chi
Kim N. Chi BC Cancer Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine opens up a wide variety of roles beyond becoming a physician. For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing a degree in healthcare administration can fast-track you toward management positions in hospitals, clinics, and other medical organizations.

Registered nurses seeking advanced roles might consider adn to msn bridge programs, which offer a flexible path to earn a master’s degree and move into leadership, research, or teaching positions.

If you’re passionate about food, wellness, and preventative care, earning a nutritionist online degree can prepare you for a career in nutrition counseling, community health, or even sports nutrition.

Those aiming for top-tier administrative roles may want to explore cahme accredited online mha programs, ensuring a strong, accredited foundation for high-level positions in healthcare management.

These online degrees and bridge programs offer flexibility and convenience, helping you advance your career in the expanding field of healthcare—whether in administration, nursing, or nutrition.

Best Scientists Citing Robert E. Reiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles