World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
61566
World Ranking
3709
National Ranking
2042

Richard Simon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Simon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 493 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard Simon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Simon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Simon is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Statistics and Probability, Speech and Hearing, and Mathematical Physics.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including:

  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Pharmaceutical studies and practices

Richard Simon has published extensively, with frequent appearances in several key journals. The most common venues for their publications are:

  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
  • Thorax
  • mSystems
  • Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology

Notable papers by Richard Simon include:

  • "Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus guidelines for the care of individuals with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease," 2020, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • "Maintenance tobramycin primarily affects untargeted bacteria in the CF sputum microbiome," 2020, Thorax
  • "Parallel Analysis of Cystic Fibrosis Sputum and Saliva Reveals Overlapping Communities and an Opportunity for Sample Decontamination," 2020, mSystems
  • "Use of Nonconcurrent Common Control in Master Protocols in Oncology Trials: Report of an American Statistical Association Biopharmaceutical Section Open Forum Discussion," 2021, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
  • "Coronary artery disease in patients with cystic fibrosis - A case series and review of the literature," 2022, Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, reflecting interdisciplinary and team-based research efforts. Frequent co-authors include:

  • John J. LiPuma
  • Lisa A. Carmody
  • Linda M. Kalikin
  • Lindsay J. Caverly
  • Rajeshwari Sridhara

Best Publications

  • The Use of Molecular Profiling to Predict Survival after Chemotherapy for Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma

    Andreas Rosenwald;George Wright;Wing C. Chan;Wing C. Chan;Joseph M. Connors

  • Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial.

    Stuart J. Pocock;Richard Simon

  • Prediction of survival in follicular lymphoma based on molecular features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells

    Sandeep S. Dave;George Wright;Bruce Tan;Andreas Rosenwald;Andreas Rosenwald

  • Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods

    Annette M. Molinaro;Richard Simon;Ruth M. Pfeiffer

  • Relation of gene expression phenotype to immunoglobulin mutation genotype in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Andreas Rosenwald;Ash A. Alizadeh;George Widhopf;Richard Simon

  • Molecular Diagnosis of Primary Mediastinal B Cell Lymphoma Identifies a Clinically Favorable Subgroup of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Related to Hodgkin Lymphoma

    Andreas Rosenwald;George Wright;Karen Leroy;Xin-You Yu

  • The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell lymphoma

    Andreas Rosenwald;George Wright;Adrian Wiestner;Wing C. Chan;Wing C. Chan

  • Use of Archived Specimens in Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers

    Richard M. Simon;Soonmyung Paik;Daniel F. Hayes

  • Predicting hepatitis B virus-positive metastatic hepatocellular carcinomas using gene expression profiling and supervised machine learning.

    Qing Hai Ye;Lun Xiu Qin;Marshonna Forgues;Ping He

  • Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma.

    Sandeep S. Dave;Kai Fu;George W. Wright;Lloyd T. Lam

  • Cystic Fibrosis Adult Care: Consensus Conference Report

    James R. Yankaskas;Bruce C. Marshall;Beth Sufian;Richard H. Simon

  • Randomized clinical trials. Perspectives on some recent ideas.

    David P. Byar;Richard M. Simon;William T. Friedewald;James J. Schlesselman

  • Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in transgenic mice that either lack or overexpress the murine plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene.

    Daniel T. Eitzman;Ronald D. McCoy;Xianxian Zheng;William P. Fay

  • Gene Expression Profiling of Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma with cDNA Microarrays

    Javed Khan;Richard Simon;Michael Bittner;Yidong Chen

  • Confidence Intervals for Reporting Results of Clinical Trials

    Richard Simon

  • Targeted injury of type II alveolar epithelial cells induces pulmonary fibrosis.

    Thomas H. Sisson;Michael Mendez;Karen Choi;Natalya Subbotina

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subgroups have distinct genetic profiles that influence tumor biology and improve gene-expression-based survival prediction.

    Silvia Bea;Andreas Zettl;George Wright;Itziar Salaverria

  • A neural network model for survival data.

    David Faraggi;Richard Simon

  • Twenty Years of Phase III Trials for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Perceptible Progress

    John P. Chute;Timothy Chen;Ellen Feigal;Richard Simon

  • Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) of the Prostate: Recommendations from an International Working Group.

    Caroline M. Moore;Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Scott Eggener;Mark Emberton

Frequent Co-Authors

Clemencia Pinilla
Clemencia Pinilla Florida International University
Edward L. Korn
Edward L. Korn National Institutes of Health
Roland Martin
Roland Martin University of Zurich
Marc Peters-Golden
Marc Peters-Golden University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marc E. Lippman
Marc E. Lippman National Institutes of Health
Malcolm A. Smith
Malcolm A. Smith National Institutes of Health
Baris Turkbey
Baris Turkbey National Institutes of Health
James H. Doroshow
James H. Doroshow National Institutes of Health
Peter F. Thall
Peter F. Thall The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Peter L. Choyke
Peter L. Choyke National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative education pathways in medicine can be a smart choice for many students. Online programs now offer flexible options to advance your healthcare career beyond traditional routes. For example, if you are a registered nurse aiming for leadership roles, check out some of the most affordable dnp programs available online.

Those interested in pharmaceuticals may want to consider accredited online pharmd programs, which can open doors to clinical and research roles in pharmacy practice.

If your strengths lie with information management or health records, pursuing online rhit degree programs could lead to rewarding roles in health information technology.

For those seeking a quick entry into the medical field, you might look at medical billing and coding online courses cost to evaluate cost-effective certificate options. These programs can prepare you for in-demand positions in medical billing and coding. Online healthcare degrees provide diverse, affordable ways to build your career in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Simon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles