World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
21561
World Ranking
19801
National Ranking
9862

Paul J. Goodfellow publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Goodfellow sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 358 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul J. Goodfellow D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Goodfellow sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Goodfellow is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on cancer, particularly genetic factors and molecular mechanisms related to colorectal, endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, Cancer
  • Prospective Statewide Study of Universal Screening for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: The Ohio Colorectal Cancer Prevention Initiative, 2021, JCO Precision Oncology
  • Characterization of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability-discordant endometrial cancers, 2023, Cancer
  • Double somatic mismatch repair gene pathogenic variants as common as Lynch syndrome among endometrial cancer patients, 2020, Gynecologic Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul J. Goodfellow include:

  • David E. Cohn
  • Casey Cosgrove
  • Adrian A. Suarez
  • Heather Hampel
  • Rachel Pearlman

Paul J. Goodfellow has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Cancer
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • JCO Precision Oncology
  • The Oncologist

Their main fields of study are Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, significant subfields of study include:

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cancer Research
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Genetics
  • Reproductive Medicine

Their research covers key topics such as:

  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms

Best Publications

  • Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma

    Gad Getz;Stacey B. Gabriel;Kristian Cibulskis;Eric Lander

  • Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN 2A and FMTC

    Helen Donis-Keller;Shenshen Dou;David Chi;Katrin M. Carlson

  • Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft

    Li Ding;Matthew J C Ellis;Shunqiang Li;David E. Larson

  • Single missense mutation in the tyrosine kinase catalytic domain of the RET protooncogene is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B.

    Katrin M. Carlson;Shenshen Dou;David Chi;Nancy Scavarda

  • DICER1 Mutations in Familial Pleuropulmonary Blastoma

    D. Ashley Hill;D. Ashley Hill;Jennifer Ivanovich;John R. Priest;Christina A. Gurnett

  • Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations Among Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

    Rachel Pearlman;Wendy L Frankel;Benjamin Swanson;Weiqiang Zhao

  • Assignment of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A to chromosome 10 by linkage

    N. E. Simpson;K. K. Kidd;P. J. Goodfellow;H. McDermid

  • Brief report: a familial syndrome of pancreatic cancer and melanoma with a mutation in the CDKN2 tumor-suppressor gene.

    Alison J. Whelan;Detlef Bartsch;Paul J. Goodfellow

  • Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes.

    Pamela Pollock;Michael Gartside;L. Dejeza;Matthew Powell

  • Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer.

    Roger L Milne;Roger L Milne;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Kyriaki Michailidou;Kyriaki Michailidou;Jonathan Beesley

  • MLH1 Promoter Methylation and Gene Silencing is the Primary Cause of Microsatellite Instability in Sporadic Endometrial Cancers

    Sally B. Simpkins;Tina Bocker;Elizabeth M. Swisher;David G. Mutch

  • Patterns and functional implications of rare germline variants across 12 cancer types

    Charles Lu;Mingchao Xie;Michael C. Wendl;Jiayin Wang;Jiayin Wang

  • A common variant at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus is associated with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer

    Christopher A. Haiman;Gary K. Chen;Celine M. Vachon;Federico Canzian

  • The T-box transcription factor gene TBX22 is mutated in X-linked cleft palate and ankyloglossia.

    Claire Braybrook;Kit Doudney;Ana Carolina B. Marçano;Alfred Arnason

  • Epigenetic Repression of microRNA-129-2 Leads to Overexpression of SOX4 Oncogene in Endometrial Cancer

    Yi Wen Huang;Joseph C. Liu;Daniel E. Deatherage;Jingqin Luo

  • Use of mutation profiles to refine the classification of endometrial carcinomas.

    Melissa K McConechy;Jiarui Ding;Jiarui Ding;Maggie Cu Cheang;Kimberly C Wiegand

  • Integrated analysis of germline and somatic variants in ovarian cancer

    Krishna L. Kanchi;Kimberly J. Johnson;Kimberly J. Johnson;Charles Lu;Michael D. McLellan

  • Ovarian and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas have distinct CTNNB1 and PTEN mutation profiles

    Melissa K McConechy;Jiarui Ding;Janine Senz;Winnie Yang

  • Parent-of-origin effects in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B.

    Katrin M. Carlson;John Bracamontes;Charles E. Jackson;Robin Clark

  • Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

    Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos;Barbara Norquist;Christina Lacchetti;Deborah Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Mutch
David G. Mutch Washington University in St. Louis
David E. Cohn
David E. Cohn The Ohio State University
Samuel A. Wells
Samuel A. Wells National Cancer Institute
Heather Hampel
Heather Hampel The Ohio State University
Feng Gao
Feng Gao Linköping University
feng gao
feng gao Duke University
Li Ding
Li Ding Washington University in St. Louis
Elaine R. Mardis
Elaine R. Mardis The Ohio State University
Tim H M Huang
Tim H M Huang The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Richard K. Wilson
Richard K. Wilson Nationwide Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their options beyond traditional medicine, there are a variety of online programs and healthcare career routes to consider. Many prospective students explore allied health careers or alternative pathways into nursing, health administration, or medical support fields.

One growing option is enrolling in direct entry online MSN programs. These programs allow students with a non-nursing background to earn a master's in nursing, often in a shorter time frame, and prepare for advanced nursing roles. If you're looking for flexibility in admission requirements, consider researching easy nursing schools to get into or absn programs that don't require teas. These programs can provide accessible routes to a nursing career for diverse applicants.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, training as a medical coder or biller can be completed online. There are fully accredited medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid, helping make this practical career choice more affordable. Exploring these alternative degree pathways can help you find the right fit for your skills and career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Goodfellow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles