World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
22
Citations
3100
World Ranking
3099
National Ranking
174

J.L. Ellis publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.L. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 83 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

J.L. Ellis D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.L. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 22 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Biochemistry
  • Ecology
  • Botany

Her primary scientific interests are in Rumen, Beef cattle, Animal science, Mean squared prediction error and Methane production. Part of her project on Rumen includes research on Biochemistry, Fermentation and Food science. Her work in Neutral Detergent Fiber and Dry matter is related to Animal science.

Her work deals with themes such as Enteric fermentation and Pollutant, which intersect with Neutral Detergent Fiber. Her Methane production research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Kyoto Protocol and Greenhouse gas. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Statistics and Regression.

Her most cited work include:

  • Prediction of Methane Production from Dairy and Beef Cattle (293 citations)
  • Aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle (162 citations)
  • Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH (152 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her main research concerns Animal science, Rumen, Food science, Dry matter and Dairy cattle. Her Animal science research incorporates themes from Digestion, Biotechnology, Excretion and Methane. Her Rumen study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Silage, Agronomy and Lactic acid.

Jennifer L. Ellis combines subjects such as Stoichiometry and Fatty acid with her study of Food science. In the field of Dry matter, her study on Neutral Detergent Fiber overlaps with subjects such as Lactation. Jennifer L. Ellis integrates many fields, such as Dairy cattle and Composition, in her works.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Animal science (58.90%)
  • Rumen (65.75%)
  • Food science (35.62%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Rumen (65.75%)
  • Animal science (58.90%)
  • Dairy cattle (35.62%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jennifer L. Ellis mostly deals with Rumen, Animal science, Dairy cattle, Biochemistry and Food science. Fermentation covers she research in Rumen. Her research in Animal science intersects with topics in Forage and Uterus.

Her Dairy cattle research includes elements of Extracellular, Dry matter and Intracellular. Her research integrates issues of Blood flow, Concordance correlation coefficient and Beef cattle in her study of Dry matter. As a part of the same scientific family, Jennifer L. Ellis mostly works in the field of Food science, focusing on Lactobacillus plantarum and, on occasion, Neutral Detergent Fiber.

Between 2015 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production (28 citations)
  • The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production (28 citations)
  • Effects of lactic acid bacteria silage inoculation on methane emission and productivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle (21 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Biochemistry
  • Ecology
  • Botany

Her primary areas of study are Rumen, Food science, Microbial inoculant, Lactobacillus buchneri and Silage. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Neutral Detergent Fiber and Lactic acid. Her study on Neutral Detergent Fiber is covered under Dry matter.

Jennifer L. Ellis has included themes like Fermentation and Botany in her Lactic acid study. Her work in Microbial inoculant is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Lactobacillus plantarum. Her Substrate degradation study spans across into fields like Digestion, Biochemistry, Volatile fatty acids, Intake rate and Microbial metabolism.

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Methane Production from Dairy and Beef Cattle

    J.L. Ellis;E. Kebreab;N.E. Odongo;B.W. McBride

  • Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH

    J. Dijkstra;J. L. Ellis;E. Kebreab;A. B. Strathe

  • Aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle

    J.L. Ellis;J. Dijkstra;E. Kebreab;A. Bannink

  • Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models

    J. L. Ellis;A. Bannink;E. Kebreab

  • Cranial dimensions and forces of biting in the domestic dog.

    Jennifer Lynn Ellis;Jeffrey Thomason;Ermias Kebreab;Kasim Zubair

  • Quantifying the effect of monensin dose on the rumen volatile fatty acid profile in high-grain-fed beef cattle.

    J. L. Ellis;J. Dijkstra;A. Bannink;E. Kebreab

  • Modeling methane production from beef cattle using linear and nonlinear approaches.

    J. L. Ellis;E. Kebreab;N. E. Odongo;N. E. Odongo;K. Beauchemin

  • Effects of dietary starch content and rate of fermentation on methane production in lactating dairy cows.

    B. Hatew;S.C. Podesta;H. Van Laar;W.F. Pellikaan

  • Calibration of estimated biting forces in domestic canids: comparison of post-mortem and in vivo measurements

    Jennifer Lynn Ellis;Jeffrey J. Thomason;Ermias Kebreab

  • Effect of high-sugar grasses on methane emissions simulated using a dynamic model

    J.L. Ellis;J.L. Ellis;J. Dijkstra;A.J. Parsons

  • Simulating the effects of grassland management and grass ensiling on methane emission from lactating cows.

    A. Bannink;M. C. J. Smits;E. Kebreab;Jonathan A. N. Mills

  • Challenges in ruminant nutrition: towards minimal nitrogen losses in cattle

    J. Dijkstra;C. K. Reynolds;E. Kebreab;A. Bannink

  • Review: Synergy between mechanistic modelling and data-driven models for modern animal production systems in the era of big data.

    J.L. Ellis;M. Jacobs;J. Dijkstra;H. van Laar

  • The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production

    J.L. Ellis;J.L. Ellis;A. Bannink;I.K. Hindrichsen;R.D. Kinley

  • Effects of lactic acid bacteria silage inoculation on methane emission and productivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle

    J.L. Ellis;J.L. Ellis;I.K. Hindrichsen;G. Klop;R.D. Kinley

  • The Contribution of Mathematical Modeling to Understanding Dynamic Aspects of Rumen Metabolism.

    André Bannink;Henk J. van Lingen;Jennifer L. Ellis;Jennifer L. Ellis

  • Meta-analysis to predict the effects of temperature stress on meat quality of poultry.

    Emily M. Leishman;Jennifer Ellis;Nienke van Staaveren;Shai Barbut

  • The effect of high-sugar grass on predicted nitrogen excretion and milk yield simulated using a dynamic model

    J.L. Ellis;J.L. Ellis;J. Dijkstra;A. Bannink;A.J. Parsons

  • A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens.

    Nienke van Staaveren;Jennifer Ellis;Christine F. Baes;Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek

  • Productions efficiency of ruminants: feed, nitrogen and methane

    J. Dijkstra;J.L. Ellis;A.B. Strathe

  • Meta-analysis of factors that affect the utilization efficiency of phosphorus in lactating dairy cows.

    G. Klop;J.L. Ellis;A. Bannink;E. Kebreab

  • Evaluation of net energy expenditures of dairy cows according to body weight changes over a full lactation.

    J.L. Ellis;F. Qiao;J.P. Cant

  • Effects of nutritional strategies on simulated nitrogen excretion and methane emission in dairy cattle.

    J. Dijkstra;J. L. Ellis;E. Kebreab

  • Modeling methane production from beef cattle using linear and nonlinear approaches [Erratum: 2009 May, v. 87, no. 5, p. 1849.]

    J.L. Ellis;E. Kebreab;N.E. Odongo;K. Beauchemin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Dijkstra
Jan Dijkstra Wageningen University & Research
A. Bannink
A. Bannink Wageningen University & Research
Ermias Kebreab
Ermias Kebreab University of California, Davis
Secundino López
Secundino López University of Leon
Christopher K. Reynolds
Christopher K. Reynolds University of Reading
Nicholas E. Odongo
Nicholas E. Odongo Pwani University
Brian W. McBride
Brian W. McBride University of Guelph
Karen A. Beauchemin
Karen A. Beauchemin Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Walter J. J. Gerrits
Walter J. J. Gerrits Wageningen University & Research
Erasmus K. Okine
Erasmus K. Okine University of Lethbridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Animal Science and Veterinary fields often leads to diverse career opportunities that extend beyond traditional roles. For those interested in leadership within sports or animal-related organizations, understanding how to become an athletic director can open doors to managing teams and facilities focused on animal-assisted therapies or performance animals. Leadership and administrative skills are crucial here.

Many students explore health sciences related to animals, and pursuing online exercise science degrees allows for specialization in physical health, rehabilitation, and wellness—fields closely linked to veterinary physical therapy and animal fitness. These programs offer flexibility and speed, helping learners balance studies with practical experience.

Another promising pathway includes advanced certifications such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst credentials. Discovering the best bcba programs can guide those aiming to specialize in animal behavior analysis or therapy, supporting improved welfare and training techniques.

Finally, integrating psychological principles through nasp approved online programs strengthens understanding of behavioral science, both human and animal, which is useful for careers in research, education, or clinical practice within veterinary medicine. These programs provide valuable interdisciplinary insight.

Best Scientists Citing J.L. Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles