World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
34
Citations
6906
World Ranking
2309
National Ranking
365

Markus Blut publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Blut sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 101 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Markus Blut D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Blut sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI

    Markus Blut;Cheng Wang;Nancy V. Wünderlich;Christian Brock

  • Consequences of customer loyalty to the loyalty program and to the company

    Heiner Evanschitzky;B. Ramaseshan;David M. Woisetschläger;Verena Richelsen

  • Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage

    Markus Blut;Cheng Wang

  • Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review

    Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer;Markus Blut;Sarah Hong Xiao;Dhruv Grewal

  • E-Service Quality: Development of a Hierarchical Model

    Markus Blut

  • How to Make Brand Communities Work: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Participation

    David M. Woisetschläger;Vivian Hartleb;Markus Blut

  • Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Mobile Shopping: Mobile Benefits, Customer Characteristics, Perceived Risks, and the Impact of Application Context

    Marco Hubert;Markus Blut;Christian Brock;Christof Backhaus

  • Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Self-Service Technologies:A Meta-Analysis

    Markus Blut;Cheng Wang;Klaus Schoefer

  • The influence of acceptance and adoption drivers on smart home usage

    Marco Hubert;Markus Blut;Christian Brock;Ruby Wenjiao Zhang;Ruby Wenjiao Zhang

  • Consumer ethnocentrism in the German market

    Heiner Evanschitzky;Florian v. Wangenheim;David M. Woisetschläger;Markus Blut;Markus Blut

  • Testing Retail Marketing-Mix Effects on Patronage: A Meta-Analysis

    Markus Blut;Christoph Teller;Arne Floh

  • Meta-Analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Challenging its Validity and Charting a Research Agenda in the Red Ocean

    Markus Blut;Alain Yee Loong Chong;Zayyad Tsigna;Viswanath Venkatesh

  • The impact of service characteristics on the switching costs-customer loyalty link

    Markus Blut;Sharon E. Beatty;Heiner Evanschitzky;Christian Brock

  • Switching Barriers in the Four-Stage Loyalty Model

    Markus Blut;Heiner Evanschitzky;Verena Vogel;Dieter Ahlert

  • What to Expect after the Honeymoon: Testing a Lifecycle Theory of Franchise Relationships

    Markus Blut;Christof Backhaus;Tobias Heussler;David M. Woisetschläger

  • Customer solutions in the capital goods industry: Examining the impact of the buying center

    Alke Töllner;Markus Blut;Hartmut H. Holzmüller

  • New Insights in the Moderating Effect of Switching Costs on the Satisfaction–Repurchase Behavior Link

    Liane Nagengast;Heiner Evanschitzky;Markus Blut;Thomas Rudolph

  • Will You Tolerate This? The Impact of Affective Commitment on Complaint Intention and Postrecovery Behavior

    Heiner Evanschitzky;Christian Brock;Markus Blut

  • Consequences of Perceived Crowding: A Meta-Analytical Perspective

    Markus Blut;Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer

  • Factors influencing the acceptance of healthcare information technologies: A meta-analysis

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Heiner Evanschitzky
Heiner Evanschitzky University of Manchester
Peter Kenning
Peter Kenning Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Vikas Mittal
Vikas Mittal Rice University
Viswanath Venkatesh
Viswanath Venkatesh Virginia Tech
Sharon E. Beatty
Sharon E. Beatty University of Alabama
Christoph Teller
Christoph Teller Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Dhruv Grewal
Dhruv Grewal Babson College
Alain Yee-Loong Chong
Alain Yee-Loong Chong University of Nottingham
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco BI Norwegian Business School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Markus Blut

Recently Published Articles