World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
88
Citations
34273
World Ranking
1150
National Ranking
610

Mark G. Lewis publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 276 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Mark G. Lewis D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark G. Lewis is affiliated with the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant work in immunology and microbiology. Within these fields, their subfields of study include infectious diseases, immunology, virology, animal science and zoology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's major research topics cover areas related to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, including both clinical research studies and detection and testing methods. They have also contributed to HIV research and treatment, animal virus infection studies, immunotherapy and immune responses, and immune cell function and interaction.

Mark G. Lewis has published extensively, with frequent appearances in publications such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Science Translational Medicine, npj Vaccines, Cell, and Nature. Their recent notable papers include:

  • Correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques, 2020, Nature
  • Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques, 2020, Science
  • SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques, 2020, Science
  • Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques, 2020, Nature

Their frequent coauthors include Hanné Andersen, Anthony Cook, Laurent Pessaint, Dan H. Barouch, and Katherine McMahan.

Best Publications

  • Protection of macaques against vaginal transmission of a pathogenic HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus by passive infusion of neutralizing antibodies

    John R. Mascola;Gabriela Stiegler;Thomas C. VanCott;Hermann Katinger

  • Protection of Macaques against Pathogenic Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus 89.6PD by Passive Transfer of Neutralizing Antibodies

    John R. Mascola;Mark G. Lewis;Gabriela Stiegler;Dawn Harris

  • Correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques.

    Katherine McMahan;Jingyou Yu;Noe B. Mercado;Carolin Loos;Carolin Loos

  • Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates.

    Kizzmekia S Corbett;Barbara Flynn;Kathryn E Foulds;Joseph R Francica

  • Control of Viremia and Prevention of Clinical AIDS in Rhesus Monkeys by Cytokine-Augmented DNA Vaccination

    Dan H. Barouch;Sampa Santra;Jörn E. Schmitz;Marcelo J. Kuroda

  • DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques.

    Jingyou Yu;Lisa H. Tostanoski;Lauren Peter;Noe B. Mercado

  • Zika virus protection by a single low-dose nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccination

    Norbert Pardi;Michael J. Hogan;Rebecca S. Pelc;Hiromi Muramatsu

  • SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques.

    Abishek Chandrashekar;Jinyan Liu;Amanda J. Martinot;Amanda J. Martinot;Katherine McMahan

  • Eventual AIDS vaccine failure in a rhesus monkey by viral escape from cytotoxic T lymphocytes

    Dan H. Barouch;Jennifer Kunstman;Marcelo J. Kuroda;Jörn E. Schmitz

  • Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques.

    Noe B. Mercado;Roland Zahn;Frank Wegmann;Carolin Loos;Carolin Loos

  • Animal models for COVID-19.

    César Muñoz-Fontela;William E. Dowling;Simon G.P. Funnell;Pierre S. Gsell

  • Therapeutic efficacy of potent neutralizing HIV-1-specific monoclonal antibodies in SHIV-infected rhesus monkeys

    Dan H. Barouch;James B. Whitney;Brian Moldt;Florian Klein

  • Rapid seeding of the viral reservoir prior to SIV viraemia in rhesus monkeys

    James B. Whitney;Alison L. Hill;Srisowmya Sanisetty;Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster

  • A virus-like particle vaccine for epidemic Chikungunya virus protects nonhuman primates against infection

    Wataru Akahata;Zhi Yong Yang;Hanne Andersen;Siyang Sun

  • Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys

    Peter Abbink;Rafael A. Larocca;Rafael A. De La Barrera;Christine A. Bricault

  • REGN-COV2 antibodies prevent and treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in rhesus macaques and hamsters

    Alina Baum;Dharani Ajithdoss;Richard Copin;Anbo Zhou

  • Nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines induce potent T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses.

    Norbert Pardi;Michael J. Hogan;Martin S. Naradikian;Kaela Parkhouse

  • Rapid development of a DNA vaccine for Zika virus

    Kimberly A. Dowd;Sung-Youl Ko;Kaitlyn M. Morabito;Eun Sung Yang

  • SARS-CoV-2 variant prediction and antiviral drug design are enabled by RBD in vitro evolution.

    Jiří Zahradník;Shir Marciano;Maya Shemesh;Eyal Zoler

  • Mosaic RBD nanoparticles protect against challenge by diverse sarbecoviruses in animal models

    Unknown

  • Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 severe clinical disease in hamsters.

    Lisa H. Tostanoski;Frank Wegmann;Amanda J. Martinot;Amanda J. Martinot;Carolin Loos;Carolin Loos

  • ALVAC-SIV-gag-pol-env-Based Vaccination and Macaque Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I (A*01) Delay Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac-Induced Immunodeficiency

    R. Pal;D. Venzon;N. L. Letvin;S. Santra

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan H. Barouch
Dan H. Barouch Harvard Medical School
David C. Montefiori
David C. Montefiori Duke University
Barton F. Haynes
Barton F. Haynes Duke University
David B. Weiner
David B. Weiner The Wistar Institute
Peter Abbink
Peter Abbink Harvard Medical School
Jean D. Boyer
Jean D. Boyer Inovio Pharmaceuticals (United States)
Kevin O. Saunders
Kevin O. Saunders Duke University
Sampa Santra
Sampa Santra Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Aaron G. Schmidt
Aaron G. Schmidt Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in immunology, pursuing related healthcare degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider entry points like Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) programs, which offer practical knowledge and hands-on experience. Finding lpn programs easy to get into can be a strategic first step for gaining foundational clinical skills.

Advancing nursing education often leads to specialized roles such as Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP). If convenience and flexibility matter, identifying the easiest fnp program can help students transition smoothly into advanced practice nursing.

Mental health is a critical area intersecting with immunology, especially considering the body’s response to stress and illness. Online Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) programs with robust support for clinical training are essential. Programs recognized among the pmhnp programs online with best clinical placement provide students with practical experience necessary for certification and employment.

Cost-effectiveness is also an important factor. Many prospective healthcare professionals seek cheapest online pmhnp certificate programs to reduce financial burden while receiving quality education. These programs balance affordability with comprehensive curricula to prepare students for rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark G. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles