World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 76 1133 587 175 27851

Jon A. Wolff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon A. Wolff between 1968 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon A. Wolff published across 55 years, from 1968 to 2022, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2006. 1 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2006. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 7 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1968 2022

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon A. Wolff: publications per year, 1968 to 2022
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 2
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 4
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 7
1992 11
1993 9
1994 8
1995 7
1996 11
1997 11
1998 7
1999 11
2000 6
2001 5
2002 9
2003 11
2004 3
2005 9
2006 12
2007 10
2008 8
2009 7
2010 5
2011 5
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 188
Download as CSV

Jon A. Wolff publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon A. Wolff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 175 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131 175
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon A. Wolff D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon A. Wolff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77 76
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jon A. Wolff was affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research contributions spanned multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work covered several specific subfields, including geriatrics and gerontology, genetics, oncology, and molecular biology. Their scholarly output also addressed various topics such as pharmaceutical practices and patient outcomes, virus-based gene therapy research, CAR-T cell therapy research, and viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects.

Among the recent publications attributed to Jon A. Wolff were the following:

  • 263 Informing Intervention Design in Cognitively Impaired Populations: Lessons Learned from the Optimize Deprescribing Intervention, 2022, Age and Ageing
  • Reengineering a receptor footprint of adeno-associated virus enables selective and systemic gene transfer to muscle, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Current Status of Pharmaceutical and Genetic Therapeutic Approaches to Treat DMD, 2020, UNC Libraries

Their frequent publication venues included UNC Libraries and Age and Ageing, with multiple contributions in the former and at least one publication in the latter.

Jon A. Wolff collaborated with several coauthors during their career. Recurring collaborators included O Sheehan, EA Bayliss, Andrew R. Green, ML Drace, and James S Norton.

Best Publications

  • Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo.

    Jon A. Wolff;Robert W. Malone;Phillip Williams;Wang Chong

  • High levels of foreign gene expression in hepatocytes after tail vein injections of naked plasmid DNA.

    Guofeng Zhang;Vladimir Budker;Jon A. Wolff

  • Long-term persistence of plasmid DNA and foreign gene expression in mouse muscle.

    Jon A. Wolff;James J. Ludtke;Gyula Acsadi;Philip Williams

  • Efficient delivery of siRNA for inhibition of gene expression in postnatal mice

    David L. Lewis;James E. Hagstrom;Aaron G. Loomis;Jon A. Wolff

  • Dynamic PolyConjugates for targeted in vivo delivery of siRNA to hepatocytes.

    David B. Rozema;David L. Lewis;Darren H. Wakefield;So C. Wong

  • Human dystrophin expression in mdx mice after intramuscular injection of dna constructs

    Gyula Acsadi;George Dickson;Donald R. Love;Agnes Jani

  • Grafting genetically modified cells to the damaged brain: restorative effects of NGF expression

    Michael B. Rosenberg;Theodore Friedmann;Robin C. Robertson;Mark Tuszynski

  • Progress and prospects: naked DNA gene transfer and therapy.

    H Herweijer;J A Wolff

  • Conditions affecting direct gene transfer into rodent muscle in vivo.

    Wolff Ja;Williams P;Acsadi G;Jiao S

  • Direct Gene Transfer into Nonhuman Primate Myofibers In Vivo

    Shoushu Jiao;Phillip Williams;Randi K. Berg;Bradley A. Hodgeman

  • Plasmid DNA entry into postmitotic nuclei of primary rat myotubes

    Martin E. Dowty;Phillip Williams;Guofeng Zhang;James E. Hagstrom

  • DNA vector chemistry: The covalent attachment of signal peptides to plasmid DNA

    Magdolna G. Sebestyén;James J. Ludtke;Michael C. Bassik;Guofeng Zhang

  • The Mechanism of Naked DNA Uptake and Expression

    Jon A Wolff;Vladimir Budker

  • Direct gene transfer and expression into rat heart in vivo.

    G Acsadi;S S Jiao;A Jani;D Duke

  • Long-term correction of rat model of Parkinson's disease by gene therapy

    Shoushu Jiao;Vladimir Gurevich;Jon A. Wolff

  • A nuclear localization signal can enhance both the nuclear transport and expression of 1 kb DNA.

    James J. Ludtke;Guofeng Zhang;Magdolna G. Sebestyén;Jon A. Wolff

  • Grafting genetically modified cells to the brain: possibilities for the future.

    F.H. Gage;J.A. Wolff;M.B. Rosenberg;L. Xu

  • Expression of naked plasmids by cultured myotubes and entry of plasmids into T tubules and caveolae of mammalian skeletal muscle.

    Jon A. Wolff;Martin E. Dowty;Shoushu Jiao;Gabriella Repetto

  • Hypothesis: naked plasmid DNA is taken up by cells in vivo by a receptor-mediated process.

    Vladimir Budker;Tatayana Budker;Guofeng Zhang;Vladimir Subbotin

  • Reengineering a receptor footprint of adeno-associated virus enables selective and systemic gene transfer to muscle

    Aravind Asokan;Julia C. Conway;Jana L. Phillips;Chengwen Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Marion L. Greaser
Marion L. Greaser University of Wisconsin–Madison
Theodore Friedmann
Theodore Friedmann University of California, San Diego
Franklin R. Manis
Franklin R. Manis University of Southern California
Stuart J. Knechtle
Stuart J. Knechtle Duke University
Philip L. Felgner
Philip L. Felgner University of California, Irvine
Xandra O. Breakefield
Xandra O. Breakefield Harvard University
Dietrich Matern
Dietrich Matern Mayo Clinic
Catherine McBride-Chang
Catherine McBride-Chang Purdue University West Lafayette
Brage S. Andresen
Brage S. Andresen University of Southern Denmark
Louise T. Chow
Louise T. Chow University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to a range of related fields and flexible online learning options. Many students interested in the life sciences also consider degrees in complementary areas to broaden their knowledge and career prospects.

For example, a strong foundation in math is crucial in scientific research. Those seeking flexibility may find the online math bachelor's degree a valuable option. Similarly, combining scientific knowledge with creative skills can be an asset, and an online graphic design degree can help you communicate complex biological concepts visually.

Interdisciplinary approaches are also increasingly favored. Programs such as best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees allow you to tailor your studies around molecular biology, mathematics, and even computer science. If your interests extend to scientific history, or you’re considering roles in science communication and education, a masters in history can build useful analytical and research skills.

Choosing a related online degree ensures diverse career pathways, offering flexibility while building valuable cross-disciplinary expertise relevant to today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jon A. Wolff

Recently Published Articles