World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10800 10145 5558 5139 538 35228

Dennis P. Orgill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dennis P. Orgill between 1974 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dennis P. Orgill published across 53 years, from 1974 to 2026, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2016. 30 of the 619 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2016. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 2 publications
1974 2026

619 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dennis P. Orgill: publications per year, 1974 to 2026
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 4
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 4
1995 4
1996 6
1997 8
1998 10
1999 8
2000 4
2001 5
2002 5
2003 2
2004 11
2005 14
2006 14
2007 20
2008 22
2009 28
2010 12
2011 24
2012 20
2013 25
2014 29
2015 28
2016 47
2017 25
2018 26
2019 32
2020 29
2021 30
2022 32
2023 21
2024 26
2025 28
2026 2
Total 619
Download as CSV

Dennis P. Orgill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis P. Orgill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 538 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 538
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dennis P. Orgill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis P. Orgill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Dennis P. Orgill is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery and related subfields. Their research output encompasses a wide range of topics, primarily centered on wound healing, reconstructive surgery, and rehabilitation.

The main areas of study in Orgill's work include:

  • Medicine

Their research features specific subfields such as:

  • Surgery
  • Rehabilitation
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Oncology

The focal topics covered by Orgill's publications are:

  • Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Body Contouring and Surgery

Orgill's frequent coauthors include:

  • Adriana C. Panayi
  • Samuel Knoedler
  • Dany Y. Matar
  • Mengfan Wu
  • Valentin Haug

Publications by Orgill appear regularly in the following venues:

  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
  • International Wound Journal
  • Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Selected recent papers include:

  • Exacerbation of Physical Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Radiology
  • A Wirelessly Controlled Smart Bandage with 3D-Printed Miniaturized Needle Arrays, 2020, Advanced Functional Materials
  • Light-Controlled Growth Factors Release on Tetrapodal ZnO-Incorporated 3D-Printed Hydrogels for Developing Smart Wound Scaffold, 2021, Advanced Functional Materials
  • Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, International Journal of Surgery
  • Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing

In 2013, Orgill was awarded the title of Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE).

Best Publications

  • The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines

    Riaz A Agha;Mimi R Borrelli;Reem Farwana;Kiron Koshy

  • The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines

    Riaz A Agha;Alexander J Fowler;Alexandra Saeta;Ishani Barai

  • Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin.

    I. V. Yannas;Edward Y. Lee;Dennis Paul Orgill;E. M. Skrabut

  • Vacuum-assisted closure: microdeformations of wounds and cell proliferation.

    Vishal Saxena;Chao Wei Hwang;Sui Huang;Quentin Eichbaum

  • The PROCESS 2018 Statement: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines

    Riaz A Agha;Mimi R Borrelli;Reem Farwana;Kiron Koshy

  • Wound tissue can utilize a polymeric template to synthesize a functional extension of skin

    IV Yannas;JF Burke;DP Orgill;EM Skrabut

  • The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery

    Riaz Ahmed Agha;Mimi R. Borrelli;Martinique Vella-Baldacchino;Rachel Thavayogan

  • Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing.

    Chenyu Huang;Tripp Leavitt;Lauren Bayer;Dennis Paul Orgill

  • The mechanism of action of the vacuum-assisted closure device.

    Sandra Saja Scherer;Giorgio Pietramaggiori;Jasmine C. Mathews;Michael J. Prsa

  • Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open tibia-fibula fractures.

    Brian M Parrett;Evan Matros;Julian J Pribaz;Dennis P Orgill

  • The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn.

    Dennis P. Orgill;Ernest K. Manders;Bauer E. Sumpio;Raphael C. Lee

  • Microdeformational wound therapy: effects on angiogenesis and matrix metalloproteinases in chronic wounds of 3 debilitated patients.

    Arin K Greene;Mark Puder;Roopali Roy;Danielle Arsenault

  • Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines.

    Riaz A Agha;Alexander J Fowler;Shivanchan Rajmohan;Ishani Barai

  • North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part I: Diagnosis, evaluation, and the use of complementary and procedural management.

    Ali Alikhan;Christopher Sayed;Afsaneh Alavi;Raed Alhusayen

  • North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: A publication from the United States and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations: Part II: Topical, intralesional, and systemic medical management

    Ali Alikhan;Christopher Sayed;Afsaneh Alavi;Raed Alhusayen

  • Three Patients with Full Facial Transplantation

    Bohdan Pomahac;Julian Joseph Pribaz;Elof Eriksson;Ericka Bueno

  • Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    A.C. Panayi;A.R. Orkaby;D. Sakthivel;Y. Endo

  • Prevention and management of sternal wound infections

    Harold L. Lazar;Thomas Vander Salm;Richard Engelman;Dennis Orgill

  • Angiogenesis in wounds treated by microdeformational wound therapy.

    Paolo Erba;Rei Ogawa;Rei Ogawa;Maximilian Ackermann;Avner Adini

  • A protocol for the development of the STROCSS guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery

    Riaz A. Agha;Mimi R. Borrelli;Martinique Vella-Baldacchino;Rachel Thavayogan

Frequent Co-Authors

George F. Murphy
George F. Murphy Brigham and Women's Hospital
Amy J. Wagers
Amy J. Wagers Harvard University
Ali Tamayol
Ali Tamayol University of Connecticut
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Stuart R. Lipsitz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Douglas G. Altman
Douglas G. Altman University of Oxford
Monica M. Bertagnolli
Monica M. Bertagnolli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Isaac S. Kohane
Isaac S. Kohane Harvard University
Chandrajit P. Raut
Chandrajit P. Raut Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jamie Rossjohn
Jamie Rossjohn Monash University
Carolyn C. Compton
Carolyn C. Compton Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in building a fulfilling career in healthcare but not ready to commit to a full medical degree, there are several flexible and affordable online options to consider. These programs can provide valuable credentials and open doors to in-demand roles within the medical field.

For those drawn to healthcare data and administration, online schools for health information management offer accredited programs that train you to manage patient information systems and medical records. Alternatively, those seeking to start working quickly might benefit from a low cost medical coding and billing online program, which can lead to essential support roles in clinics and hospitals.

Many aspiring nurses are turning to online learning for both flexibility and affordability. You can find cheapest online fnp program options for becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, or enroll in affordable online nursing programs that offer pathways from entry-level nursing to advanced practice.

These online degrees can be a smart, cost-effective first step toward a rewarding healthcare career or as a stepping-stone to medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Dennis P. Orgill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles