World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
45
Citations
9561
World Ranking
2849
National Ranking
1362

David Van Vactor publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Van Vactor sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 93 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

David Van Vactor D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Van Vactor sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1957 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

David Van Vactor is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their work covers several key topics, including RNA Research and Splicing, Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research, Physiological and Biochemical Adaptations, MicroRNA in Disease Regulation, Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, and Health and Medical Research Impacts.

David Van Vactor has contributed to multiple publications across notable venues. The most frequent places of publication include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neural Development, iScience, eLife, and Nature Communications.

  • Control of feeding by Piezo-mediated gut mechanosensation in Drosophila, 2021, eLife
  • Synapse development and maturation at the drosophila neuromuscular junction, 2020, Neural Development
  • The conserved microRNA miR-34 regulates synaptogenesis via coordination of distinct mechanisms in presynaptic and postsynaptic cells, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Single-nuclei transcriptome analysis of Huntington disease iPSC and mouse astrocytes implicates maturation and functional deficits, 2022, iScience
  • miRNA: local guardians of presynaptic function in plasticity and disease, 2021, RNA Biology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, including Vivian Chou, Pushpa Verma, Elizabeth M. McNeill, Alicia Taylor, and Andrea M. Reyes-Ortiz.

David Van Vactor's career includes recognition such as being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1957.

Best Publications

  • The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery

    Laura Anne Lowery;David Van Vactor

  • Drosophila Liprin-α and the Receptor Phosphatase Dlar Control Synapse Morphogenesis

    Nancy Kaufmann;Jamin DeProto;Ravi Ranjan;Hong Wan

  • The tyrosine kinase Abl and its substrate enabled collaborate with the receptor phosphatase Dlar to control motor axon guidance.

    Zachary Wills;Jack Bateman;Christopher A Korey;Allen Comer

  • The Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Trio Mediates Axonal Development in the Drosophila Embryo

    Jack Bateman;Huidy Shu;David Van Vactor

  • MicroRNAs Shape the Neuronal Landscape

    Elizabeth McNeill;David Van Vactor

  • The HSPGs Syndecan and Dallylike Bind the Receptor Phosphatase LAR and Exert Distinct Effects on Synaptic Development

    Karl G. Johnson;Alan P. Tenney;Aurnab Ghose;April M. Duckworth

  • Profilin and the Abl Tyrosine Kinase Are Required for Motor Axon Outgrowth in the Drosophila Embryo

    Zachary Wills;Linsey Marr;Kai Zinn;Corey S Goodman

  • Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in Nervous System Development

    Karl G. Johnson;David Van Vactor

  • The Microtubule Plus End Tracking Protein Orbit/MAST/CLASP Acts Downstream of the Tyrosine Kinase Abl in Mediating Axon Guidance

    Haeryun Lee;Ulrike Engel;Jannette Rusch;Simone Scherrer

  • Axonal heparan sulfate proteoglycans regulate the distribution and efficiency of the repellent slit during midline axon guidance.

    Karl G Johnson;Aurnab Ghose;Elizabeth Epstein;John Lincecum

  • Dysregulation of microRNA-219 promotes neurodegeneration through post-transcriptional regulation of tau

    Ismael Santa-Maria;Maria E. Alaniz;Neil Renwick;Carolina Cela

  • Induction in the developing compound eye of Drosophila: Multiple mechanisms restrict R7 induction to a single retinal precursor cell

    David L. Van Vactor;Ross L. Cagan;Helmut Krämer;S.Lawrence Zipursky

  • Modeling Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Drosophila

    Howard Chia-Hao Chang;Douglas N. Dimlich;Takakazu Yokokura;Ashim Mukherjee

  • Transgenic microRNA inhibition with spatiotemporal specificity in intact organisms

    Carlos M Loya;Cecilia S Lu;David Van Vactor;Tudor A Fulga

  • Genetic analysis of protein tyrosine phosphatases

    David Van Vactor;Alana M O'Reilly;Benjamin G Neel

  • The receptor tyrosine phosphatase Dlar and integrins organize actin filaments in the Drosophila follicular epithelium

    Jack Bateman;R.Srekantha Reddy;Haruo Saito;David Van Vactor

  • QIL1 is a novel mitochondrial protein required for MICOS complex stability and cristae morphology

    Virginia Guarani;Elizabeth M McNeill;Joao A Paulo;Edward L Huttlin

  • Direct Observation Demonstrates that Liprin-α Is Required for Trafficking of Synaptic Vesicles

    Kyle E. Miller;Jamin DeProto;Nancy Kaufmann;Bharatkumar N. Patel

  • Enabled plays key roles in embryonic epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila

    Julie Gates;Julie Gates;James P. Mahaffey;Stephen L. Rogers;Mark Emerson

  • miR-132 Enhances Dendritic Morphogenesis, Spine Density, Synaptic Integration, and Survival of Newborn Olfactory Bulb Neurons

    Manavendra Pathania;Juan Torres-Reveron;Lily D Yan;Tomoki Kimura

Frequent Co-Authors

Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas Harvard University
Norbert Perrimon
Norbert Perrimon Harvard University
John G. Flanagan
John G. Flanagan University of California, Berkeley
Gaudenz Danuser
Gaudenz Danuser The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Leslie C. Griffith
Leslie C. Griffith Brandeis University
Haruo Saito
Haruo Saito University of Tokyo
Stephen D. Liberles
Stephen D. Liberles Harvard University
Dennis P. Wall
Dennis P. Wall Stanford University
Angélique Bordey
Angélique Bordey Yale University
Eric C. Lai
Eric C. Lai Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a variety of online degrees and evolving career paths in the health sciences. For those considering a transition into nursing, direct entry msn programs are available for non-nurses looking to fast-track their credentials and specialize in advanced practice roles.

If you are already a registered nurse and want to advance your skills, comparing top programs is essential. Learn how capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn programs stack up when it comes to flexibility, accreditation, and student support.

Budget is another key consideration for many students. Online bridge programs make it possible to level up your degree efficiently; discover the cheapest bsn to msn online options to keep your education affordable without sacrificing quality.

Finally, choosing an institution with strong accreditation is important for long-term career growth. Review the non profit online university list to ensure you select a school with a solid reputation and credible programs.

Best Scientists Citing David Van Vactor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles