World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
18280
World Ranking
10597
National Ranking
765

Frank Bradke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Bradke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 126 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Frank Bradke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Bradke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2014 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Neurosciences
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Frank Bradke is affiliated with the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their subfields of study include cellular and molecular neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, cell biology, molecular biology, and neurology.

The main topics covered in Frank Bradke's work include:

  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Axon guidance and neuronal signaling
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Spinal cord injury research
  • Cellular mechanics and interactions
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms

Frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Neuron
  • Brain Communications
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among recent papers, notable titles include:

  • Therapeutic repair for spinal cord injury: combinatory approaches to address a multifaceted problem, 2020, EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • RhoA drives actin compaction to restrict axon regeneration and astrocyte reactivity after CNS injury, 2021, Neuron
  • An active vesicle priming machinery suppresses axon regeneration upon adult CNS injury, 2021, Neuron
  • Axon Growth of CNS Neurons in Three Dimensions Is Amoeboid and Independent of Adhesions, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Mechanisms of Axon Growth and Regeneration: Moving between Development and Disease, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Frank Bradke include:

  • Sebastián Dupraz
  • Brett J. Hilton
  • Jarred M. Griffin
  • Barbara Schaffran
  • Eissa Alfadil

The scientist has been recognized by several awards and memberships, including:

  • Member of the Academia Europaea (2018)
  • Member of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina - Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften (2014) in Neurosciences
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Best Publications

  • Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin

    Julia Riedl;Alvaro H. Crevenna;Kai Kessenbrock;Jerry Haochen Yu

  • Three-dimensional imaging of solvent-cleared organs using 3DISCO.

    Ali Ertürk;Klaus Becker;Klaus Becker;Nina Jährling;Nina Jährling;Nina Jährling;Christoph P Mauch

  • Regeneration of Sensory Axons within the Injured Spinal Cord Induced by Intraganglionic cAMP Elevation

    Simona Neumann;Frank Bradke;Marc Tessier-Lavigne;Allan I. Basbaum

  • The Role of Local Actin Instability in Axon Formation

    Frank Bradke;Carlos G. Dotti

  • Microtubule stabilization specifies initial neuronal polarization.

    Harald Witte;Dorothee Neukirchen;Frank Bradke

  • Microtubule Stabilization Reduces Scarring and Causes Axon Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury

    Farida Hellal;Andres Hurtado;Jörg Ruschel;Kevin C. Flynn

  • Assembly of a new growth cone after axotomy: the precursor to axon regeneration

    Frank Bradke;James W. Fawcett;Micha E. Spira

  • Systemic administration of epothilone B promotes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury

    Jörg Ruschel;Farida Hellal;Kevin C. Flynn;Sebastian Dupraz

  • Disorganized Microtubules Underlie the Formation of Retraction Bulbs and the Failure of Axonal Regeneration

    Ali Ertürk;Farida Hellal;Joana Enes;Frank Bradke

  • Three-dimensional imaging of the unsectioned adult spinal cord to assess axon regeneration and glial responses after injury

    Ali Ertürk;Ali Ertürk;Christoph P Mauch;Farida Hellal;Friedrich Förstner

  • Reducing HDAC6 ameliorates cognitive deficits in a mouse model for Alzheimer's disease.

    Nambirajan Govindarajan;Pooja Rao;Susanne Burkhardt;Susanne Burkhardt;Farahnaz Sananbenesi;Farahnaz Sananbenesi

  • Lifeact mice for studying F-actin dynamics

    Julia Riedl;Kevin C Flynn;Aurelia Raducanu;Florian Gärtner

  • Coordinating Neuronal Actin–Microtubule Dynamics

    Charlotte H. Coles;Frank Bradke

  • Neuronal Polarity: Vectorial Cytoplasmic Flow Precedes Axon Formation

    Frank Bradke;Carlos G Dotti

  • Axon extension occurs independently of centrosomal microtubule nucleation.

    Michael Stiess;Nicola Maghelli;Lukas C. Kapitein;Susana Gomis-Rüth

  • Cdc42 regulates cofilin during the establishment of neuronal polarity

    Boyan K. Garvalov;Kevin C. Flynn;Dorothee Neukirchen;Liane Meyn

  • Establishment of neuronal polarity: lessons from cultured hippocampal neurons.

    Frank Bradke;Carlos G Dotti

  • The role of the cytoskeleton during neuronal polarization.

    Harald Witte;Frank Bradke

  • ADF/Cofilin-Mediated Actin Retrograde Flow Directs Neurite Formation in the Developing Brain

    Kevin C. Flynn;Kevin C. Flynn;Farida Hellal;Dorothee Neukirchen;Sonja Jacob

  • Control of neuronal polarity and plasticity--a renaissance for microtubules?

    Casper C. Hoogenraad;Frank Bradke

Frequent Co-Authors

Armin Blesch
Armin Blesch Indiana University
John L. Bixby
John L. Bixby University of Miami
Cord Brakebusch
Cord Brakebusch University of Copenhagen
Casper C. Hoogenraad
Casper C. Hoogenraad Utrecht University
James R. Bamburg
James R. Bamburg Colorado State University
Walter Witke
Walter Witke University of Bonn
James W. Fawcett
James W. Fawcett University of Cambridge
Vance Lemmon
Vance Lemmon University of Miami
Frank Kirchhoff
Frank Kirchhoff University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to diverse career paths, many of which now offer online study options. For those interested in leadership within the healthcare industry, enrolling in online healthcare mba programs can be a smart move. These programs combine science with management skills, preparing graduates for advanced roles in hospital administration or biotech companies.

Another growing field is medical billing and coding, where professionals transform healthcare services into universal codes for billing and record-keeping. If you are comparing the merits of a certification, understanding the difference between certified professional coder (CPC) and Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) credentials is crucial. Each certification has unique benefits, cost structures, and salary prospects.

Many wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder. Training durations can vary, but accelerated programs and online classes mean you might be ready to work in just months. Importantly, the question is medical billing and coding in demand has a positive answer: job opportunities are strong, reflecting the ongoing need for expertise in healthcare data and compliance.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Bradke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles