World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
80
Citations
23596
World Ranking
998
National Ranking
527

David Kimelman publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Kimelman sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 152 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

David Kimelman D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Kimelman sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Kimelman is a researcher affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with substantial contributions in molecular biology and cell biology. Their research extends into specialized areas including aging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and cancer research.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, highlighting an emphasis on single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, congenital heart defects, and zebrafish biomedical research applications. Other key topics include developmental biology and gene regulation, RNA modifications in cancer, pluripotent stem cells, and genetics related to aging and longevity in model organisms.

David Kimelman has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • A single-cell time-lapse of mouse prenatal development from gastrula to birth (2024, Nature)
  • Embryo-scale reverse genetics at single-cell resolution (2023, Nature)
  • Proteostasis governs differential temperature sensitivity across embryonic cell types (2023, Cell)
  • Hox13 genes are required for mesoderm formation and axis elongation during early zebrafish development (2020, Development)
  • Deep molecular, cellular and temporal phenotyping of developmental perturbations at whole organism scale (2022, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])

The frequent co-authors collaborating with David Kimelman include:

  • Cole Trapnell
  • Jay Shendure
  • Madeleine Duran
  • Sanjay Srivatsan
  • Lauren M. Saunders

The venues where their research is regularly published reflect their active presence in influential scientific journals and preprint servers. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Development
  • Nature
  • Cell
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • The axis-inducing activity, stability, and subcellular distribution of beta-catenin is regulated in Xenopus embryos by glycogen synthase kinase 3.

    Cynthia Yost;Monica Torres;Jeffrey R. Miller;Eugene Huang

  • Synergistic induction of mesoderm by FGF and TGF-β and the identification of an mRNA coding for FGF in the early xenopus embryo

    David Kimelman;Marc Kirschner

  • Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.

    Junhao Mao;Junhao Mao;Jiyong Wang;Bo Liu;Bo Liu;Weijun Pan

  • A beta-catenin/XTcf-3 complex binds to the siamois promoter to regulate dorsal axis specification in Xenopus.

    Mark Brannon;Miranda Gomperts;Lauro Sumoy;Randall T. Moon

  • beta-catenin destruction complex: insights and questions from a structural perspective.

    D Kimelman;W Xu

  • Establishment of the Dorso-ventral Axis in Xenopus Embryos Is Presaged by Early Asymmetries in β-Catenin That Are Modulated by the Wnt Signaling Pathway

    Carolyn A. Larabell;Monica Torres;Brian A. Rowning;Cynthia Yost

  • Role of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β in Neuronal Apoptosis Induced by Trophic Withdrawal

    Michal Hetman;Jane E. Cavanaugh;David Kimelman;Zhengui Xia

  • Crystal Structure of a β-Catenin/Tcf Complex

    Thomas A. Graham;Carole Weaver;Feng Mao;David Kimelman

  • Axin and Frat1 interact with Dvl and GSK, bridging Dvl to GSK in Wnt-mediated regulation of LEF-1

    Lin Li;Huidong Yuan;Carole D. Weaver;Junhao Mao

  • A homeobox gene essential for zebrafish notochord development

    William S. Talbot;Bill Trevarrow;Bill Trevarrow;Marnie E. Halpern;Marnie E. Halpern;Anna E. Melby

  • Molecular identification of spadetail: regulation of zebrafish trunk and tail mesoderm formation by T-box genes

    Kevin J. P. Griffin;Sharon L. Amacher;Charles B. Kimmel;David Kimelman

  • The presence of fibroblast growth factor in the frog egg: its role as a natural mesoderm inducer.

    David Kimelman;Judith A. Abraham;Tapio Haaparanta;Thomas M. Palisi

  • GBP, an Inhibitor of GSK-3, Is Implicated in Xenopus Development and Oncogenesis

    Cynthia Yost;Gist H Farr;Sarah B Pierce;Denise M Ferkey

  • From cortical rotation to organizer gene expression: toward a molecular explanation of axis specification in Xenopus

    Randall T. Moon;David Kimelman

  • The events of the midblastula transition in Xenopus are regulated by changes in the cell cycle.

    David Kimelman;Marc Kirschner;Talma Scherson

  • An antisense mRNA directs the covalent modification of the transcript encoding fibroblast growth factor in Xenopus oocytes

    David Kimelman;Marc W. Kirschner

  • XCtBP is a XTcf-3 co-repressor with roles throughout Xenopus development

    M. Brannon;J.D. Brown;R. Bates;D. Kimelman

  • Regulation of Spemann organizer formation by the intracellular kinase Xgsk-3.

    Sarah B. Pierce;David Kimelman

  • Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/axin complex suggests a mechanism for the beta-catenin destruction complex.

    Yi Xing;Wilson K. Clements;David Kimelman;Wenqing Xu

  • Localized BMP-4 mediates dorsal/ventral patterning in the early Xenopus embryo.

    Jennifer E. Schmidt;Atsushi Suzuki;Naoto Ueno;David Kimelman

Frequent Co-Authors

Wenqing Xu
Wenqing Xu University of Washington
Randall T. Moon
Randall T. Moon University of Washington
Ethan Bier
Ethan Bier University of California, San Diego
William S. Talbot
William S. Talbot Stanford University
Mont R. Juchau
Mont R. Juchau University of Washington
Charles B. Kimmel
Charles B. Kimmel University of Oregon
Didier Y. R. Stainier
Didier Y. R. Stainier Max Planck Society
Alexander F. Schier
Alexander F. Schier University of Basel
Wolfgang Driever
Wolfgang Driever University of Freiburg
David W. Raible
David W. Raible University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to diverse healthcare careers, especially with the growing range of online degree options. If you’re interested in clinical practice, you might consider transition programs like asn to np programs, which allow registered nurses to advance to nurse practitioner roles with a molecular or biological focus.

For those without a nursing background, direct entry msn programs online offer a fast-track into advanced nursing and molecular specialties, even if your undergraduate degree is in biology. When choosing a pathway, it's important to compare different universities. For example, exploring the differences between wgu vs chamberlain can help you select the best online program for your goals.

Cost is a key factor in pursuing further education. For those aiming to build on their credentials, bsn to msn online programs offer affordable options to specialize in molecular fields. By leveraging these pathways, students in Molecular Biology can secure rewarding positions in both research and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David Kimelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles