World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
32
Citations
3550
World Ranking
5994
National Ranking
1451

Matthew Haworth publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Haworth sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 71 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Matthew Haworth D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Haworth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Macroecological responses of terrestrial vegetation to climatic and atmospheric change across the Triassic/Jurassic boundary in East Greenland

    Jennifer C. McElwain;Mihai E. Popa;Stephen P. Hesselbo;Matthew Haworth

  • Increased fire activity at the Triassic/Jurassic boundary in Greenland due to climate-driven floral change

    Claire M. Belcher;Luke Mander;Guillermo Rein;Freddy X. Jervis

  • Adaptation to high temperature mitigates the impact of water deficit during combined heat and drought stress in C3 sunflower and C4 maize varieties with contrasting drought tolerance

    Dilek Killi;Filippo Bussotti;Antonio Raschi;Matthew Haworth

  • Hot, dry, wet, cold or toxic? Revisiting the ecological significance of leaf and cuticular micromorphology

    Matthew Haworth;Jennifer McElwain

  • Stomatal control as a driver of plant evolution

    Matthew Haworth;Caroline Elliott-Kingston;Jennifer C. McElwain

  • Co-ordination of physiological and morphological responses of stomata to elevated [CO2] in vascular plants

    Matthew Haworth;Caroline Elliott-Kingston;Jennifer C. McElwain

  • Mid-Cretaceous pCO2 based on stomata of the extinct conifer Pseudofrenelopsis (Cheirolepidiaceae)

    Matthew Haworth;Stephen P. Hesselbo;Jennifer C. McElwain;Stuart A. Robinson

  • Photosynthetic Diffusional Constraints Affect Yield in Drought Stressed Rice Cultivars during Flowering

    Marco Lauteri;Matthew Haworth;Rachid Serraj;Maria Cristina Monteverdi

  • The Impact of Heat Stress and Water Deficit on the Photosynthetic and Stomatal Physiology of Olive (Olea europaea L.)—A Case Study of the 2017 Heat Wave

    Matthew Haworth;Giovanni Marino;Cecilia Brunetti;Cecilia Brunetti;Dilek Killi

  • Does Size Matter? Atmospheric CO2 May Be a Stronger Driver of Stomatal Closing Rate Than Stomatal Size in Taxa That Diversified under Low CO2

    Caroline Elliott-Kingston;Matthew Haworth;Jon M. Yearsley;Sven P. Batke

  • Coordination of stomatal physiological behavior and morphology with carbon dioxide determines stomatal control

    Matthew Haworth;Dilek Killi;Dilek Killi;Alessandro Materassi;Antonio Raschi

  • Differences in the response sensitivity of stomatal index to atmospheric CO2 among four genera of Cupressaceae conifers.

    Matthew Haworth;James Heath;Jennifer C. McElwain

  • The functional significance of the stomatal size to density relationship: Interaction with atmospheric [CO2] and role in plant physiological behaviour.

    Unknown

  • Leaf and canopy photosynthesis of a chlorophyll deficient soybean mutant

    Karolina Sakowska;Giorgio Alberti;Giorgio Alberti;Lorenzo Genesio;Alessandro Peressotti

  • Integrating stomatal physiology and morphology: evolution of stomatal control and development of future crops

    Matthew Haworth;Giovanni Marino;Francesco Loreto;Francesco Loreto;Mauro Centritto;Mauro Centritto

  • Impaired Stomatal Control Is Associated with Reduced Photosynthetic Physiology in Crop Species Grown at Elevated [CO2].

    Matthew Haworth;Dilek Killi;Alessandro Materassi;Antonio Raschi

  • On the use of leaf spectral indices to assess water status and photosynthetic limitations in Olea europaea L. during water-stress and recovery.

    Pengsen Sun;Said Wahbi;Tsonko Tsonev;Matthew Haworth

  • Allocation of the epidermis to stomata relates to stomatal physiological control: Stomatal factors involved in the evolutionary diversification of the angiosperms and development of amphistomaty

    Matthew Haworth;Charles P. Scutt;Cyril Douthe;Giovanni Marino

  • Increased free abscisic acid during drought enhances stomatal sensitivity and modifies stomatal behaviour in fast growing giant reed (Arundo donax L.)

    Matthew Haworth;Giovanni Marino;Salvatore Luciano Cosentino;Cecilia Brunetti;Cecilia Brunetti

  • Diffusive and Metabolic Constraints to Photosynthesis in Quinoa during Drought and Salt Stress

    Dilek Killi;Matthew Haworth

  • Physiological responses of Arundo donax ecotypes to drought: a common garden study

    Matthew Haworth;Salvatore Luciano Cosentino;Giovanni Marino;Cecilia Brunetti;Cecilia Brunetti

  • Opportunities and Limitations of Crop Phenotyping in Southern European Countries.

    Joaquim Miguel Costa;Jorge Marques da Silva;Carla Pinheiro;Matilde Barón

  • Xylem morphology determines the drought response of two Arundo donax ecotypes from contrasting habitats

    Matthew Haworth;Mauro Centritto;Alessio Giovannelli;Giovanni Marino

  • Increased Atmospheric SO2 Detected from Changes in Leaf Physiognomy across the Triassic–Jurassic Boundary Interval of East Greenland

    Karen L. Bacon;Claire M. Belcher;Matthew Haworth;Jennifer C. McElwain

Frequent Co-Authors

Mauro Centritto
Mauro Centritto National Research Council (CNR)
Jennifer C. McElwain
Jennifer C. McElwain Trinity College Dublin
Francesco Loreto
Francesco Loreto University of Naples Federico II
Cecilia Brunetti
Cecilia Brunetti National Research Council (CNR)
Antonio Raschi
Antonio Raschi National Research Council (CNR)
Salvatore Luciano Cosentino
Salvatore Luciano Cosentino University of Catania
Gail Taylor
Gail Taylor University College London
Jaume Flexas
Jaume Flexas University of the Balearic Islands
Franco Miglietta
Franco Miglietta National Research Council (CNR)
Said Wahbi
Said Wahbi Cadi Ayyad University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Haworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles