World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
73
Citations
22059
World Ranking
1268
National Ranking
650

William S. Talbot publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William S. Talbot sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 113 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

William S. Talbot D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William S. Talbot sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1959 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William S. Talbot is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Neuroscience. Their work spans key subfields such as Molecular Biology, Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Cell Biology.

Talbot's recent scientific output includes multiple publications in prominent venues across various disciplines. Notable papers authored or co-authored by Talbot include:

  • Myelination induces axonal hotspots of synaptic vesicle fusion that promote sheath growth (2021, Current Biology)
  • A lysosomal regulatory circuit essential for the development and function of microglia (2022, Science Advances)
  • Promoting validation and cross-phylogenetic integration in model organism research (2022, Disease Models & Mechanisms)
  • Characterization of mouse Bmp5 regulatory injury element in zebrafish wound models (2021, Bone)
  • Unmyelinated sensory neurons use Neuregulin signals to promote myelination of interneurons in the CNS (2022, Cell Reports)

Talbot frequently publishes with several co-authors, including Ana M. Meireles, Harini Iyer, Daniel E. Lysko, Rafael Almeida, and J Williamson, reflecting collaborative research efforts.

The scientist's work is also disseminated through recurring publication venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), ACS Chemical Biology, Current Biology, Science Advances, and Disease Models & Mechanisms.

Their research focuses on several main topics relevant to contemporary biomedical science, including:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Advanced Biosensing and Bioanalysis Techniques
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research

In recognition of contributions to the scientific community, William S. Talbot has been awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) on two occasions, in 1959 and 2014.

Best Publications

  • The drosophila EcR gene encodes an ecdysone receptor, a new member of the steroid receptor superfamily

    Michael R. Koelle;William S. Talbot;William A. Segraves;Michael T. Bender

  • Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map.

    John H. Postlethwait;Yi-Lin Yan;Michael A. Gates;Sally Horne

  • Drosophila tissues with different metamorphic responses to ecdysone express different ecdysone receptor isoforms

    William S. Talbot;Elizabeth A. Swyryd;David S. Hogness

  • The EGF-CFC Protein One-Eyed Pinhead Is Essential for Nodal Signaling

    Kira Gritsman;Jiaojiao Zhang;Simon Cheng;Elizabeth Heckscher

  • Zebrafish organizer development and germ-layer formation require nodal-related signals

    Benjamin Feldman;Michael A. Gates;Elizabeth S. Egan;Scott T. Dougan

  • Zebrafish Comparative Genomics and the Origins of Vertebrate Chromosomes

    John H. Postlethwait;Ian G. Woods;Phuong Ngo-Hazelett;Yi Lin Yan

  • Molecular Genetics of Axis Formation in Zebrafish

    Alexander F. Schier;William S. Talbot

  • The cloche and spadetail genes differentially affect hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis.

    M. A. Thompson;D. G. Ransom;S. J. Pratt;H. Maclennan

  • A homeobox gene essential for zebrafish notochord development

    William S. Talbot;Bill Trevarrow;Bill Trevarrow;Marnie E. Halpern;Marnie E. Halpern;Anna E. Melby

  • Positional Cloning Identifies Zebrafish one-eyed pinhead as a Permissive EGF-Related Ligand Required during Gastrulation

    Jiaojiao Zhang;William S. Talbot;Alexander F. Schier

  • A genetic linkage map for the zebrafish

    John H. Postlethwait;Stephen L. Johnson;Clare N. Midson;William S. Talbot

  • A Comparative Map of the Zebrafish Genome

    Ian G. Woods;Peter D. Kelly;Felicia Chu;Phuong Ngo-Hazelett

  • Mouse Lefty2 and zebrafish antivin are feedback inhibitors of nodal signaling during vertebrate gastrulation.

    Chikara Meno;Kira Gritsman;Sachiko Ohishi;Yasuhisa Ohfuji

  • The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrate chromosomes

    Ian G. Woods;Catherine Wilson;Brian Friedlander;Patricia Chang

  • Mapping the Pairwise Choices Leading from Pluripotency to Human Bone, Heart, and Other Mesoderm Cell Types

    Kyle M. Loh;Angela Chen;Pang Wei Koh;Tianda Z. Deng

  • A G Protein-Coupled Receptor is Essential for Schwann Cells to Initiate Myelination

    Kelly R. Monk;Stephen G. Naylor;Thomas D. Glenn;Sara Mercurio

  • Comparative synteny cloning of zebrafish you-too: mutations in the Hedgehog target gli2 affect ventral forebrain patterning

    Rolf O. Karlstrom;William S. Talbot;Alexander F. Schier

  • The one-eyed pinhead gene functions in mesoderm and endoderm formation in zebrafish and interacts with no tail

    Alexander F. Schier;Stephan C. F. Neuhauss;Kathryn Ann Helde;William S. Talbot

  • Drosophila Ecdysone Receptor Mutations Reveal Functional Differences among Receptor Isoforms

    Michael Bender;Farhad B Imam;William S Talbot;Barry Ganetzky

  • Correction: Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map

    John Postlethwait;Yi-Lin Yan;Michael Gates;Sally Horne

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander F. Schier
Alexander F. Schier University of Basel
David A. Lyons
David A. Lyons University of Edinburgh
John H. Postlethwait
John H. Postlethwait University of Oregon
Yi-Lin Yan
Yi-Lin Yan University of Oregon
Leonard I. Zon
Leonard I. Zon Harvard University
Barry H. Paw
Barry H. Paw Brigham and Women's Hospital
David M. Kingsley
David M. Kingsley Stanford University
Garth A. Nicholson
Garth A. Nicholson University of Sydney
Nigel G. Laing
Nigel G. Laing University of Western Australia
Christopher Shaw
Christopher Shaw King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens diverse career avenues, including roles in healthcare, research, and academia. For those aiming to bridge biology with nursing, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online provide an accelerated pathway for biology graduates seeking advanced nursing credentials.

Choosing the right school for online study is crucial. When comparing options, students often wonder which school is better snhu vs wgu for flexible, affordable, and reputable programs. Evaluating factors like tuition, accreditation, and course format will help you make the best decision for your professional goals.

If you already hold a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN), consider advancing with bsn to msn online programs that are both affordable and fit your schedule. These programs can help molecular biology graduates transition further into specialized healthcare positions or administration.

To ensure the quality of your online degree, prioritize studying at a non profit online university. Such institutions offer accredited programs with strong reputations, supporting your long-term career prospects in biotechnology, healthcare, or research.

Best Scientists Citing William S. Talbot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles