World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
69
Citations
20882
World Ranking
2483
National Ranking
212

David C. Wraith publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Wraith sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 219 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

David C. Wraith D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Wraith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Wraith is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and immunology and microbiology, with significant attention to subfields including immunology, infectious diseases, neurology, oncology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their work covers main topics such as T-cell and B-cell immunology, COVID-19 clinical research studies, long-term effects of COVID-19, immune cell function and interaction, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, immunotherapy and immune responses, and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research.

David C. Wraith regularly publishes in several scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Immunology, Nature Medicine, Cell Reports, and Clinical & Experimental Immunology.

Recent published papers include:

  • Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in non-hospitalized adults, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study, 2020, Thorax
  • Nr4a1 and Nr4a3 Reporter Mice Are Differentially Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Signal Strength and Duration, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in both serum and saliva enhances detection of infection, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Establishing the prevalence of common tissue-specific autoantibodies following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, 2021, Clinical & Experimental Immunology

Frequent co-authors working alongside David C. Wraith include Adrian Shields, Sian Faustini, Adam F. Cunningham, Mark T. Drayson, and Alex Richter.

Best Publications

  • The epitopes of influenza nucleoprotein recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be defined with short synthetic peptides

    A.R.M. Townsend;J. Rothbard;F.M. Gotch;G. Bahadur

  • Limited heterogeneity of T cell receptors from lymphocytes mediating autoimmune encephalomyelitis allows specific immune intervention

    Hans Acha-Orbea;Dennis J. Mitchell;Luika Timmermann;David C. Wraith

  • IL-10-Secreting Regulatory T Cells Do Not Express Foxp3 but Have Comparable Regulatory Function to Naturally Occurring CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells

    Pedro L. Vieira;Jillian R. Christensen;Sophie Minaee;Emma J. O’Neill

  • Low avidity recognition of self-antigen by T cells permits escape from central tolerance

    George Y. Liu;Paul J. Fairchild;Richard M. Smith;John R. Prowle

  • Antigen recognition in autoimmune encephalomyelitis and the potential for peptide-mediated immunotherapy.

    David C. Wraith;Dawn E. Smilek;Dennis J. Mitchell;Lawrence Steinman

  • Regulation of adaptive immunity; the role of interleukin-10

    T. H. Sky Ng;Graham J. Britton;Elaine V. Hill;Johan Verhagen

  • Treatment of experimental encephalomyelitis with a peptide analogue of myelin basic protein

    Brocke S;Gijbels K;Allegretta M;Ferber I

  • Vaccination and autoimmune disease: what is the evidence?

    David C Wraith;Michel Goldman;Paul-Henri Lambert

  • Cutting Edge: Th1 Cells Facilitate the Entry of Th17 Cells to the Central Nervous System during Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

    Richard A. O'Connor;Catriona T. Prendergast;Catherine A. Sabatos;Clement W. Z. Lau

  • Peptide-based therapeutic vaccines for allergic and autoimmune diseases.

    Mark Larché;David C Wraith

  • Inhibition of T cell and antibody responses to house dust mite allergen by inhalation of the dominant T cell epitope in naive and sensitized mice.

    Gerard F. Hoyne;Robyn E. O’hehir;David C. Wraith;Wayne R. Thomas

  • Role for IL-10 in Suppression Mediated by Peptide-Induced Regulatory T Cells In Vivo

    Anette Sundstedt;Emma J. O’Neill;Kirsty S. Nicolson;David C. Wraith

  • Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhalation but not oral administration of the encephalitogenic peptide: influence of MHC binding affinity

    Barbara Metzler;David C. Wraith

  • A single amino acid change in a myelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

    Dawn E. Smilek;David C. Wraith;Suzanne Hodgkinson;Sunita Dwivedy

  • Regulatory T Cell Migration Is Dependent on Glucokinase-Mediated Glycolysis

    Madhav Kishore;Kenneth C.P. Cheung;Hongmei Fu;Fabrizia Bonacina

  • Destructive processing by asparagine endopeptidase limits presentation of a dominant T cell epitope in MBP.

    Bénédicte Manoury;Daniela Mazzeo;Lars Fugger;Nick Viner

  • SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.

    Adrian Shields;Adrian Shields;Sian E Faustini;Marisol Perez-Toledo;Sian Jossi

  • T cell recognition as the target for immune intervention in autoimmune disease

    David C. Wraith;Hugh O. McDevitt;Lawrence Steinman;Hans Acha-Orbea

  • TGF-β-dependent Induction of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Tregs by Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells

    Antonella Carambia;Barbara Freund;Dorothee Schwinge;Markus Heine

  • Peptide-induced T cell regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a role for IL-10

    Christoph Burkhart;George Y. Liu;Stephen M. Anderton;Barbara Metzler

  • Selection and fine-tuning of the autoimmune T-cell repertoire

    Stephen M. Anderton;David C. Wraith

  • T-helper 1 cells facilitate the entry of T-helper 17 cells to the central nervous system during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

    RA O'Connor;CT Prendergast;CA Sabatos;Cwz Lau

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Anderton
Stephen M. Anderton University of Edinburgh
George Y. Liu
George Y. Liu University of California, San Diego
Christopher J. Elson
Christopher J. Elson University of Bristol
Ansgar W. Lohse
Ansgar W. Lohse Universität Hamburg
Li Li
Li Li University of Queensland
Irun R. Cohen
Irun R. Cohen Weizmann Institute of Science
Lawrence Steinman
Lawrence Steinman Stanford University
Anne O'Garra
Anne O'Garra The Francis Crick Institute
Richard R. Meehan
Richard R. Meehan University of Edinburgh
Michael J. Day
Michael J. Day Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, pursuing related healthcare degrees can open diverse career paths, especially in nursing and advanced practice roles. Many students find that choosing the easiest np program tailored to their needs helps balance rigorous coursework with clinical experience effectively.

If you aim to specialize in mental health nursing, exploring online pmhnp programs with clinical placement can be crucial. These programs ensure graduates receive hands-on experience, bridging the gap between theory and real-world clinical practice.

Budget-conscious students may consider the cheapest psych np programs online, which offer quality education with reduced financial burden. Affordability can make advanced degrees more accessible without compromising educational standards.

Additionally, understanding potential earnings is important for career planning. The doctorate in nursing salary information highlights that advanced degrees can lead to competitive compensation, varying by location and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Wraith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles