World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 69 2483 2282 212 205 219 20882

David C. Wraith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David C. Wraith between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David C. Wraith published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 11 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David C. Wraith: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 3
1984 4
1985 1
1986 2
1987 3
1988 2
1989 6
1990 1
1991 2
1992 5
1993 7
1994 5
1995 6
1996 6
1997 4
1998 7
1999 7
2000 3
2001 3
2002 7
2003 5
2004 6
2005 4
2006 10
2007 2
2008 10
2009 4
2010 9
2011 1
2012 3
2013 5
2014 9
2015 4
2016 6
2017 10
2018 6
2019 2
2020 11
2021 17
2022 8
2023 6
2024 9
2025 10
2026 1
Total 243
Download as CSV

David C. Wraith publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Wraith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 219 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158 219
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

David C. Wraith D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Wraith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172 69
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David C. Wraith is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and immunology and microbiology, with significant attention to subfields including immunology, infectious diseases, neurology, oncology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their work covers main topics such as T-cell and B-cell immunology, COVID-19 clinical research studies, long-term effects of COVID-19, immune cell function and interaction, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, immunotherapy and immune responses, and monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research.

David C. Wraith regularly publishes in several scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Immunology, Nature Medicine, Cell Reports, and Clinical & Experimental Immunology.

Recent published papers include:

  • Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in non-hospitalized adults, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study, 2020, Thorax
  • Nr4a1 and Nr4a3 Reporter Mice Are Differentially Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Signal Strength and Duration, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in both serum and saliva enhances detection of infection, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Establishing the prevalence of common tissue-specific autoantibodies following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, 2021, Clinical & Experimental Immunology

Frequent co-authors working alongside David C. Wraith include Adrian Shields, Sian Faustini, Adam F. Cunningham, Mark T. Drayson, and Alex Richter.

Best Publications

  • The epitopes of influenza nucleoprotein recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be defined with short synthetic peptides

    A.R.M. Townsend;J. Rothbard;F.M. Gotch;G. Bahadur

  • Limited heterogeneity of T cell receptors from lymphocytes mediating autoimmune encephalomyelitis allows specific immune intervention

    Hans Acha-Orbea;Dennis J. Mitchell;Luika Timmermann;David C. Wraith

  • IL-10-Secreting Regulatory T Cells Do Not Express Foxp3 but Have Comparable Regulatory Function to Naturally Occurring CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells

    Pedro L. Vieira;Jillian R. Christensen;Sophie Minaee;Emma J. O’Neill

  • Low avidity recognition of self-antigen by T cells permits escape from central tolerance

    George Y. Liu;Paul J. Fairchild;Richard M. Smith;John R. Prowle

  • Antigen recognition in autoimmune encephalomyelitis and the potential for peptide-mediated immunotherapy.

    David C. Wraith;Dawn E. Smilek;Dennis J. Mitchell;Lawrence Steinman

  • Regulation of adaptive immunity; the role of interleukin-10

    T. H. Sky Ng;Graham J. Britton;Elaine V. Hill;Johan Verhagen

  • Treatment of experimental encephalomyelitis with a peptide analogue of myelin basic protein

    Brocke S;Gijbels K;Allegretta M;Ferber I

  • Vaccination and autoimmune disease: what is the evidence?

    David C Wraith;Michel Goldman;Paul-Henri Lambert

  • Cutting Edge: Th1 Cells Facilitate the Entry of Th17 Cells to the Central Nervous System during Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

    Richard A. O'Connor;Catriona T. Prendergast;Catherine A. Sabatos;Clement W. Z. Lau

  • Peptide-based therapeutic vaccines for allergic and autoimmune diseases.

    Mark Larché;David C Wraith

  • Inhibition of T cell and antibody responses to house dust mite allergen by inhalation of the dominant T cell epitope in naive and sensitized mice.

    Gerard F. Hoyne;Robyn E. O’hehir;David C. Wraith;Wayne R. Thomas

  • Role for IL-10 in Suppression Mediated by Peptide-Induced Regulatory T Cells In Vivo

    Anette Sundstedt;Emma J. O’Neill;Kirsty S. Nicolson;David C. Wraith

  • Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhalation but not oral administration of the encephalitogenic peptide: influence of MHC binding affinity

    Barbara Metzler;David C. Wraith

  • A single amino acid change in a myelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

    Dawn E. Smilek;David C. Wraith;Suzanne Hodgkinson;Sunita Dwivedy

  • Regulatory T Cell Migration Is Dependent on Glucokinase-Mediated Glycolysis

    Madhav Kishore;Kenneth C.P. Cheung;Hongmei Fu;Fabrizia Bonacina

  • Destructive processing by asparagine endopeptidase limits presentation of a dominant T cell epitope in MBP.

    Bénédicte Manoury;Daniela Mazzeo;Lars Fugger;Nick Viner

  • SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.

    Adrian Shields;Adrian Shields;Sian E Faustini;Marisol Perez-Toledo;Sian Jossi

  • T cell recognition as the target for immune intervention in autoimmune disease

    David C. Wraith;Hugh O. McDevitt;Lawrence Steinman;Hans Acha-Orbea

  • TGF-β-dependent Induction of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Tregs by Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells

    Antonella Carambia;Barbara Freund;Dorothee Schwinge;Markus Heine

  • Peptide-induced T cell regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a role for IL-10

    Christoph Burkhart;George Y. Liu;Stephen M. Anderton;Barbara Metzler

  • Selection and fine-tuning of the autoimmune T-cell repertoire

    Stephen M. Anderton;David C. Wraith

  • T-helper 1 cells facilitate the entry of T-helper 17 cells to the central nervous system during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

    RA O'Connor;CT Prendergast;CA Sabatos;Cwz Lau

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Anderton
Stephen M. Anderton University of Edinburgh
George Y. Liu
George Y. Liu University of California, San Diego
Christopher J. Elson
Christopher J. Elson University of Bristol
Ansgar W. Lohse
Ansgar W. Lohse Universität Hamburg
Li Li
Li Li University of Queensland
Irun R. Cohen
Irun R. Cohen Weizmann Institute of Science
Lawrence Steinman
Lawrence Steinman Stanford University
Anne O'Garra
Anne O'Garra The Francis Crick Institute
Richard R. Meehan
Richard R. Meehan University of Edinburgh
Michael J. Day
Michael J. Day Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, pursuing related healthcare degrees can open diverse career paths, especially in nursing and advanced practice roles. Many students find that choosing the easiest np program tailored to their needs helps balance rigorous coursework with clinical experience effectively.

If you aim to specialize in mental health nursing, exploring online pmhnp programs with clinical placement can be crucial. These programs ensure graduates receive hands-on experience, bridging the gap between theory and real-world clinical practice.

Budget-conscious students may consider the cheapest psych np programs online, which offer quality education with reduced financial burden. Affordability can make advanced degrees more accessible without compromising educational standards.

Additionally, understanding potential earnings is important for career planning. The doctorate in nursing salary information highlights that advanced degrees can lead to competitive compensation, varying by location and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Wraith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles