World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11711 11016 6008 5561 1013 32168

Anthony D. Harries publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony D. Harries between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony D. Harries published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 23.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 89 publications in 2020. 14 of the 1,096 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 89. Peak 89 publications in 2020. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 24 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 30 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 36 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 58 publications 2013: 57 publications 2014: 61 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 53 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 82 publications 2019: 64 publications 2020: 89 publications 2021: 51 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

1,096 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony D. Harries: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 6
1983 8
1984 5
1985 3
1986 3
1987 5
1988 5
1989 3
1990 2
1991 10
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 4
1996 4
1997 5
1998 6
1999 7
2000 7
2001 24
2002 20
2003 20
2004 28
2005 15
2006 19
2007 30
2008 30
2009 26
2010 36
2011 43
2012 58
2013 57
2014 61
2015 37
2016 53
2017 38
2018 82
2019 64
2020 89
2021 51
2022 60
2023 37
2024 13
2025 13
2026 1
Total 1,096
Download as CSV

Anthony D. Harries publications per year - data summary

  • Anthony D. Harries, a Medicine scholar from International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, has 1,096 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 89 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 23.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 23.8 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 124 publications, 11% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1996: 66 publications (4.1 per year); 1997-2012: 374 publications (23.4 per year); 2013-2026: 656 publications (46.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Anthony D. Harries publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony D. Harries sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,001–1,020 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,013 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77 1,013
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony D. Harries publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Anthony D. Harries, a Medicine scholar from International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, records 1,013 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Anthony D. Harries, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Anthony D. Harries ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Anthony D. Harries D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony D. Harries sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Anthony D. Harries D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Anthony D. Harries, a Medicine scholar from International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, records 91 D-Index - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Anthony D. Harries, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Anthony D. Harries ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Anthony D. Harries is affiliated with the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a research focus spanning several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Surgery, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's research interests center predominantly on Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology, with additional emphasis on COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, and Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia Detection and Treatment.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Anthony D. Harries are the following:

  • "Lifetime burden of disease due to incident tuberculosis: a global reappraisal including post-tuberculosis sequelae" (2021), published in The Lancet Global Health
  • "Post-tuberculosis mortality and morbidity: valuing the hidden epidemic" (2020), published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on TB and HIV Programme Services in Selected Health Facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi: Operational Research in Real Time" (2021), published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
  • "Assessing the Real-Time Impact of COVID-19 on TB and HIV Services: The Experience and Response from Selected Health Facilities in Nairobi, Kenya" (2021), published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
  • "Global, regional, and national estimates of tuberculosis incidence and case detection among incarcerated individuals from 2000 to 2019: a systematic analysis" (2023), published in The Lancet Public Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Anthony D. Harries include Kudakwashe C Takarinda, Pruthu Thekkur, Srinath Satyanarayana, Rony Zachariah, and Mohammed Khogali.

The scientist has published extensively in various venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Public Health Action

Best Publications

  • The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: A systematic review

    Meghan A Baker;Anthony D Harries;Anthony D Harries;Christie Y Jeon;Christie Y Jeon;Jessica E Hart

  • Early mortality among adults accessing antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa.

    Stephen D Lawn;Anthony D Harries;Xavier Anglaret;Landon Myer

  • TB/HIV : a clinical manual

    Anthony Harries;Dermot Maher;Stephen Graham

  • Antiretroviral Therapy for Prevention of Tuberculosis in Adults with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Amitabh B. Suthar;Stephen D. Lawn;Stephen D. Lawn;Julia del Amo;Haileyesus Getahun

  • Task shifting in HIV/AIDS: opportunities, challenges and proposed actions for sub-Saharan Africa

    R. Zachariah;N. Ford;M. Philips;S.Lynch

  • Tuberculosis case fatality rates in high HIV prevalence populations in sub-Saharan Africa.

    Ya Diul Mukadi;Dermot Maher;Anthony Harries

  • Scaling up interventions to achieve global tuberculosis control: progress and new developments

    Mario Raviglione;Ben Marais;Katherine Floyd;Knut Lönnroth

  • Preventing antiretroviral anarchy in sub-Saharan Africa

    AD Harries;DS Nyangulu;NJ Hargreaves;O Kaluwa

  • The HIV-associated tuberculosis epidemic--when will we act?

    Anthony D Harries;Anthony D Harries;Rony Zachariah;Elizabeth L Corbett;Elizabeth L Corbett;Stephen D Lawn;Stephen D Lawn

  • Moderate to severe malnutrition in patients with tuberculosis is a risk factor associated with early death

    R. Zachariah;M.P. Spielmann;A.D. Harries;F.M.L. Salaniponi

  • Risk factors for high early mortality in patients on antiretroviral treatment in a rural district of Malawi.

    Rony Zachariah;Margaret Fitzgerald;Moses Massaquoi;Olesu Pasulani

  • Tuberculosis and HIV: current status in Africa.

    M. C Raviglione;A. D Harries;R Msiska;David Wilkinson

  • Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and the health-related Millennium Development Goals: time for a public health approach

    Erik J Schouten;Andreas Jahn;Dalitso Midiani;Simon D Makombe

  • True outcomes for patients on antiretroviral therapy who are "lost to follow-up" in Malawi

    Joseph Kwong-Leung Yu;Solomon Chih-Cheng Chen;Kuo-Yang Wang;Chao-Sung Chang

  • Bi-directional screening for tuberculosis and diabetes: a systematic review.

    Christie Y. Jeon;Anthony D. Harries;Anthony D. Harries;Meghan A. Baker;Jessica E. Hart

  • Improving tuberculosis prevention and care through addressing the global diabetes epidemic: from evidence to policy and practice

    Knut Lönnroth;Gojka Roglic;Anthony D Harries

  • Deaths from tuberculosis in sub-Saharan African countries with a high prevalence of HIV-1

    Anthony D Harries;Nicola J Hargreaves;Julia Kemp;Amina Jindani

  • Operational research in low-income countries: what, why, and how?

    Rony Zachariah;Anthony D Harries;Anthony D Harries;Nobukatsu Ishikawa;Hans L Rieder

  • Treatment of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Coinfected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Faiz A. Khan;Jessica Minion;Madhukar Pai;Madhukar Pai;Sarah Royce

  • True Outcomes for Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy Who Are "Lost to Follow-Up" in Malawi/Veritables Issues Du Traitement Antiretroviral Pour Les Patients Consideres Comme « Perdus De Vue » Au Malawi/Evolucion Real De Los Pacientes Sometidos a Terapia Antirretroviral Y Perdidos En El Seguimiento En Malawi

    Joseph Kwong-Leung Yu;Solomon Chih-Cheng Chen;Kuo-Yang Wang;Chao-Sung Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen D. Lawn
Stephen D. Lawn London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Stephen M. Graham
Stephen M. Graham Royal Children's Hospital
John C. Reeder
John C. Reeder World Health Organization
Elizabeth L. Corbett
Elizabeth L. Corbett London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Nathan Ford
Nathan Ford World Health Organization
Robin Wood
Robin Wood University of Cape Town
Mario Raviglione
Mario Raviglione University of Milan
Ben J. Marais
Ben J. Marais University of Sydney
Christopher M. Parry
Christopher M. Parry Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Rifat Atun
Rifat Atun Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the U.S. doesn’t always mean following a traditional path. Many students now consider affordable online degrees and certification programs to gain essential healthcare skills and launch rewarding careers. One accessible starting point is earning the cheapest medical coding certification online, which opens opportunities in health information management and billing.

For those aiming to provide direct patient care, pursuing an online nursing degree is a popular choice. You can discover the cheapest online nursing programs to begin working as a licensed nurse. Experienced nurses looking to take on advanced practice roles should explore the cheapest fnp programs, which prepare you for roles such as Family Nurse Practitioner.

Additionally, nurses interested in leadership, education, or research may consider terminal degrees. There are options for the cheapest online dnp programs, which can significantly boost career prospects and earning potential.

These online learning pathways provide flexibility, affordability, and a direct route into the healthcare workforce, making them a practical alternative to traditional medical study.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony D. Harries

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles