World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
46
Citations
7724
World Ranking
2811
National Ranking
191

Chase L. Beisel publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chase L. Beisel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 132 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Chase L. Beisel D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chase L. Beisel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chase L. Beisel is affiliated with the University of Würzburg in Germany and has made substantial contributions to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a total of 183 publications. Their work largely focuses on Molecular Biology, reflecting 142 publications in this subfield, alongside contributions to Genetics, Insect Science, Endocrinology, and Ecology.

The primary research topics addressed by Beisel encompass CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology. Additional interests include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences, Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques, RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development.

Beisel's frequent collaborators include Scott P. Collins, Katharina G. Wandera, Tatjana Achmedov, Yanying Yu, and Lars Barquist, reflecting ongoing partnerships in their research endeavors.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 21 publications, Molecular Cell (7 publications), Nucleic Acids Research (6 publications), Nature Communications (4 publications), and Methods in Molecular Biology (4 publications).

Notable recent papers include:

  • "CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease" (2021, Nature Communications)
  • "Noncanonical crRNAs derived from host transcripts enable multiplexable RNA detection by Cas9" (2021, Science)
  • "CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers" (2020, Frontiers in Microbiology)
  • "Competitive Exclusion Is a Major Bioprotective Mechanism of Lactobacilli against Fungal Spoilage in Fermented Milk Products" (2020, Applied and Environmental Microbiology)
  • "The miniature CRISPR-Cas12m effector binds DNA to block transcription" (2022, Molecular Cell)

Best Publications

  • Self‐Assembled DNA Nanoclews for the Efficient Delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 for Genome Editing

    Wujin Sun;Wenyan Ji;Jordan M. Hall;Quanyin Hu

  • Programmable removal of bacterial strains by use of genome-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems.

    Ahmed A. Gomaa;Heidi E. Klumpe;Michelle L. Luo;Kurt Selle

  • Base pairing small RNAs and their roles in global regulatory networks

    Chase L. Beisel;Gisela Storz

  • Guide RNA functional modules direct Cas9 activity and orthogonality.

    Alexandra E. Briner;Paul D. Donohoue;Ahmed A. Gomaa;Kurt Selle

  • Identifying and Visualizing Functional PAM Diversity across CRISPR-Cas Systems.

    Ryan T. Leenay;Kenneth R. Maksimchuk;Rebecca A. Slotkowski;Roma N. Agrawal

  • Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression

    Michelle L. Luo;Adam S. Mullis;Ryan T. Leenay;Chase L. Beisel

  • The base-pairing RNA spot 42 participates in a multioutput feedforward loop to help enact catabolite repression in Escherichia coli.

    Chase L. Beisel;Gisela Storz

  • Rapid and Scalable Characterization of CRISPR Technologies Using an E. coli Cell-Free Transcription-Translation System

    Ryan Marshall;Colin S. Maxwell;Scott P. Collins;Thomas Jacobsen

  • CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease

    Daphne Collias;Chase L. Beisel;Chase L. Beisel

  • Deciphering, Communicating, and Engineering the CRISPR PAM

    Ryan T. Leenay;Chase L. Beisel

  • Model-guided design of ligand-regulated RNAi for programmable control of gene expression.

    Chase L Beisel;Travis S Bayer;Kevin G Hoff;Christina D Smolke

  • Design principles for riboswitch function.

    Chase L. Beisel;Christina D. Smolke

  • Current and future prospects for CRISPR-based tools in bacteria

    Michelle L. Luo;Ryan T. Leenay;Chase L. Beisel

  • Multiple factors dictate target selection by Hfq‐binding small RNAs

    Chase L Beisel;Taylor B Updegrove;Ben J Janson;Gisela Storz

  • CRISPR RNA-Dependent Binding and Cleavage of Endogenous RNAs by the Campylobacter jejuni Cas9.

    Gaurav Dugar;Ryan T. Leenay;Sara K. Eisenbart;Thorsten Bischler

  • Bacterial Adaptation to the Host's Diet Is a Key Evolutionary Force Shaping Drosophila-Lactobacillus Symbiosis.

    Maria Elena Martino;Pauline Joncour;Ryan Leenay;Hugo Gervais

  • Design of small molecule-responsive microRNAs based on structural requirements for Drosha processing

    Chase L. Beisel;Yvonne Y. Chen;Stephanie J. Culler;Kevin G. Hoff

  • Synthetic control of a fitness tradeoff in yeast nitrogen metabolism.

    Travis S Bayer;Kevin G Hoff;Chase L Beisel;Jack J Lee

  • Noncanonical crRNAs derived from host transcripts enable multiplexable RNA detection by Cas9.

    Chunlei Jiao;Sahil Sharma;Gaurav Dugar;Natalia L. Peeck

  • Synthetic Biology Approaches to Engineer Probiotics and Members of the Human Microbiota for Biomedical Applications

    Josef R. Bober;Chase L. Beisel;Nikhil U. Nair

Frequent Co-Authors

Christina D. Smolke
Christina D. Smolke Stanford University
Rodolphe Barrangou
Rodolphe Barrangou North Carolina State University
Andrea Crisanti
Andrea Crisanti University of Padua
Gisela Storz
Gisela Storz National Institutes of Health
Zhen Gu
Zhen Gu Zhejiang University
Cynthia M. Sharma
Cynthia M. Sharma University of Würzburg
Chao Wang
Chao Wang Soochow University
Quanyin Hu
Quanyin Hu University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Oliver Kurzai
Oliver Kurzai University of Würzburg
Charles A. Gersbach
Charles A. Gersbach Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career trajectories. With the rise of flexible education, students now have access to innovative programs that blend science with other disciplines. For those seeking broad academic experiences, affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees allow you to combine biology with fields like computer science or psychology. This interdisciplinary approach can lead to unique careers in biotechnology, health informatics, or science communication.

If you're interested in connecting science with history, the best online history masters programs can help link molecular discoveries to their historical and ethical contexts. For those who wish to organize scientific knowledge and resources, the cheapest library science degree online is ideal for becoming a specialist in scientific databases, archives, or research libraries.

Additionally, careers in healthcare and patient advocacy are accessible with science backgrounds. Students with an interest in communication disorders might consider asha accredited online slp programs, offering specialized paths in speech-language pathology. These diverse online degrees provide valuable skills and career flexibility for science enthusiasts in today’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Chase L. Beisel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles