World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 46 2811 2551 190 176 132 7724

Chase L. Beisel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chase L. Beisel between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chase L. Beisel published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 17 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 4 publications
2002 2026

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chase L. Beisel: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 6
2015 7
2016 7
2017 5
2018 13
2019 10
2020 10
2021 18
2022 18
2023 13
2024 20
2025 13
2026 4
Total 160
Download as CSV

Chase L. Beisel publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chase L. Beisel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 132 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 132
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Chase L. Beisel D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chase L. Beisel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 46
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Chase L. Beisel is affiliated with the University of Würzburg in Germany and has made substantial contributions to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a total of 183 publications. Their work largely focuses on Molecular Biology, reflecting 142 publications in this subfield, alongside contributions to Genetics, Insect Science, Endocrinology, and Ecology.

The primary research topics addressed by Beisel encompass CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology. Additional interests include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences, Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques, RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development.

Beisel's frequent collaborators include Scott P. Collins, Katharina G. Wandera, Tatjana Achmedov, Yanying Yu, and Lars Barquist, reflecting ongoing partnerships in their research endeavors.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 21 publications, Molecular Cell (7 publications), Nucleic Acids Research (6 publications), Nature Communications (4 publications), and Methods in Molecular Biology (4 publications).

Notable recent papers include:

  • "CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease" (2021, Nature Communications)
  • "Noncanonical crRNAs derived from host transcripts enable multiplexable RNA detection by Cas9" (2021, Science)
  • "CRISPR-Cas Systems and the Paradox of Self-Targeting Spacers" (2020, Frontiers in Microbiology)
  • "Competitive Exclusion Is a Major Bioprotective Mechanism of Lactobacilli against Fungal Spoilage in Fermented Milk Products" (2020, Applied and Environmental Microbiology)
  • "The miniature CRISPR-Cas12m effector binds DNA to block transcription" (2022, Molecular Cell)

Best Publications

  • Self‐Assembled DNA Nanoclews for the Efficient Delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 for Genome Editing

    Wujin Sun;Wenyan Ji;Jordan M. Hall;Quanyin Hu

  • Programmable removal of bacterial strains by use of genome-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems.

    Ahmed A. Gomaa;Heidi E. Klumpe;Michelle L. Luo;Kurt Selle

  • Base pairing small RNAs and their roles in global regulatory networks

    Chase L. Beisel;Gisela Storz

  • Guide RNA functional modules direct Cas9 activity and orthogonality.

    Alexandra E. Briner;Paul D. Donohoue;Ahmed A. Gomaa;Kurt Selle

  • Identifying and Visualizing Functional PAM Diversity across CRISPR-Cas Systems.

    Ryan T. Leenay;Kenneth R. Maksimchuk;Rebecca A. Slotkowski;Roma N. Agrawal

  • Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression

    Michelle L. Luo;Adam S. Mullis;Ryan T. Leenay;Chase L. Beisel

  • The base-pairing RNA spot 42 participates in a multioutput feedforward loop to help enact catabolite repression in Escherichia coli.

    Chase L. Beisel;Gisela Storz

  • Rapid and Scalable Characterization of CRISPR Technologies Using an E. coli Cell-Free Transcription-Translation System

    Ryan Marshall;Colin S. Maxwell;Scott P. Collins;Thomas Jacobsen

  • CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease

    Daphne Collias;Chase L. Beisel;Chase L. Beisel

  • Deciphering, Communicating, and Engineering the CRISPR PAM

    Ryan T. Leenay;Chase L. Beisel

  • Model-guided design of ligand-regulated RNAi for programmable control of gene expression.

    Chase L Beisel;Travis S Bayer;Kevin G Hoff;Christina D Smolke

  • Design principles for riboswitch function.

    Chase L. Beisel;Christina D. Smolke

  • Current and future prospects for CRISPR-based tools in bacteria

    Michelle L. Luo;Ryan T. Leenay;Chase L. Beisel

  • Multiple factors dictate target selection by Hfq‐binding small RNAs

    Chase L Beisel;Taylor B Updegrove;Ben J Janson;Gisela Storz

  • CRISPR RNA-Dependent Binding and Cleavage of Endogenous RNAs by the Campylobacter jejuni Cas9.

    Gaurav Dugar;Ryan T. Leenay;Sara K. Eisenbart;Thorsten Bischler

  • Bacterial Adaptation to the Host's Diet Is a Key Evolutionary Force Shaping Drosophila-Lactobacillus Symbiosis.

    Maria Elena Martino;Pauline Joncour;Ryan Leenay;Hugo Gervais

  • Design of small molecule-responsive microRNAs based on structural requirements for Drosha processing

    Chase L. Beisel;Yvonne Y. Chen;Stephanie J. Culler;Kevin G. Hoff

  • Synthetic control of a fitness tradeoff in yeast nitrogen metabolism.

    Travis S Bayer;Kevin G Hoff;Chase L Beisel;Jack J Lee

  • Noncanonical crRNAs derived from host transcripts enable multiplexable RNA detection by Cas9.

    Chunlei Jiao;Sahil Sharma;Gaurav Dugar;Natalia L. Peeck

  • Synthetic Biology Approaches to Engineer Probiotics and Members of the Human Microbiota for Biomedical Applications

    Josef R. Bober;Chase L. Beisel;Nikhil U. Nair

Frequent Co-Authors

Christina D. Smolke
Christina D. Smolke Stanford University
Rodolphe Barrangou
Rodolphe Barrangou North Carolina State University
Andrea Crisanti
Andrea Crisanti University of Padua
Gisela Storz
Gisela Storz National Institutes of Health
Zhen Gu
Zhen Gu Zhejiang University
Cynthia M. Sharma
Cynthia M. Sharma University of Würzburg
Chao Wang
Chao Wang Soochow University
Quanyin Hu
Quanyin Hu University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Oliver Kurzai
Oliver Kurzai University of Würzburg
Charles A. Gersbach
Charles A. Gersbach Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career trajectories. With the rise of flexible education, students now have access to innovative programs that blend science with other disciplines. For those seeking broad academic experiences, affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees allow you to combine biology with fields like computer science or psychology. This interdisciplinary approach can lead to unique careers in biotechnology, health informatics, or science communication.

If you're interested in connecting science with history, the best online history masters programs can help link molecular discoveries to their historical and ethical contexts. For those who wish to organize scientific knowledge and resources, the cheapest library science degree online is ideal for becoming a specialist in scientific databases, archives, or research libraries.

Additionally, careers in healthcare and patient advocacy are accessible with science backgrounds. Students with an interest in communication disorders might consider asha accredited online slp programs, offering specialized paths in speech-language pathology. These diverse online degrees provide valuable skills and career flexibility for science enthusiasts in today’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Chase L. Beisel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles