World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine Oppenheim

Catherine Oppenheim

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
20821
World Ranking
17658
National Ranking
590

Catherine Oppenheim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 559 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Catherine Oppenheim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine Oppenheim is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has a substantial publication record in the field of medicine, particularly focused on neurology and related subfields. Their research intersects multiple areas including neurology, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, genetics, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their main fields of interest encompass acute ischemic stroke management, glioma diagnosis and treatment, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, meningioma and schwannoma management, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, as well as intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research.

Catherine Oppenheim has contributed to several notable recent papers including:

  • Brain MRI Findings in Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Study (2020) published in Radiology
  • Standardization of brain MR images across machines and protocols: bridging the gap for MRI-based radiomics (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • Neurologic and neuroimaging findings in patients with COVID-19 (2020) published in Neurology
  • Prediction of Early Neurological Deterioration in Individuals With Minor Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion Intended for Intravenous Thrombolysis Alone (2021) published in JAMA Neurology
  • Tissue no-reflow despite full recanalization following thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke with proximal occlusion: A clinical study (2020) published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Their frequent co-authors include Joseph Benzakoun, Johan Pallud, Alexandre Roux, Wagih Ben Hassen, and Edouard Dezamis. This collaborative network indicates active engagement in multidisciplinary research contributions.

Publication venues where Catherine Oppenheim has been active often comprise:

  • Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Neurology
  • Stroke
  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology

The scientist's work spans many significant topics within neurology and associated disciplines, reflecting a broad and diverse research portfolio centered around neurological diseases, stroke management, brain imaging, and neuro-oncology.

Best Publications

  • Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial

    Serge Bracard;Xavier Ducrocq;Jean Louis Mas;Marc Soudant

  • Neuroimaging in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

    C. Lamy;C. Oppenheim;J. F. Méder;J. L. Mas

  • False-negative Diffusion-weighted MR Findings in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Catherine Oppenheim;Ruxandra Stanescu;Didier Dormont;Sophie Crozier

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Prediction of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

    C. Oppenheim;Y. Samson;R. Manaï;T. Lalam

  • Brain MRI Findings in Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Study.

    Stéphane Kremer;François Lersy;Jérome de Sèze;Jean-Christophe Ferré

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Does Aneurysmal Wall Enhancement on Vessel Wall-MRI Help to Distinguish Stable From Unstable Intracranial Aneurysms?

    Myriam Edjlali;Jean-Christophe Gentric;Christine Régent-Rodriguez;Denis Trystram

  • Incidence, causes and predictors of neurological deterioration occurring within 24 h following acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with pathophysiological implications

    Pierre Seners;Guillaume Turc;Catherine Oppenheim;Jean-Claude Baron

  • Diffusion tensor imaging in early Alzheimer's disease

    Olivier Naggara;Catherine Oppenheim;Dorothée Rieu;Nadine Raoux

  • DWI Lesions and TIA Etiology Improve the Prediction of Stroke After TIA

    David Calvet;Emmanuel Touzé;Catherine Oppenheim;Guillaume Turc

  • Is there an apparent diffusion coefficient threshold in predicting tissue viability in hyperacute stroke

    Catherine Oppenheim;Cécile Grandin;Yves Samson;Anne Smith

  • Which MR-derived perfusion parameters are the best predictors of infarct growth in hyperacute stroke? Comparative study between relative and quantitative measurements.

    Cécile B. Grandin;Thierry P. Duprez;Anne M. Smith;Catherine Oppenheim

  • Brain networks of spatial awareness: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging tractography

    Marika Urbanski;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Sebastian Rodrigo;Marco Catani

  • Incidence and Predictors of Early Recanalization After Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Pierre Seners;Guillaume Turc;Benjamin Maïer;Jean-Louis Mas

  • Risk of Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and High Cerebral Microbleed Burden: A Meta-analysis.

    Georgios Tsivgoulis;Georgios Tsivgoulis;Ramin Zand;Aristeidis H. Katsanos;Aristeidis H. Katsanos;Guillaume Turc

  • Linac radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: results in 169 patients.

    Michel Schlienger;Dan Atlan;Dimitrios Lefkopoulos;Louis Merienne

  • Neurologic and neuroimaging findings in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective multicenter study.

    Stéphane Kremer;François Lersy;Mathieu Anheim;Hamid Merdji

  • Diffusion-weighted imaging patterns of brain damage associated with cerebral venous thrombosis

    Denis Ducreux;Catherine Oppenheim;Xavier Vandamme;Didier Dormont

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Claude Baron
Jean-Claude Baron Université Paris Cité
Jean-Louis Mas
Jean-Louis Mas Université Paris Cité
Didier Dormont
Didier Dormont Université Paris Cité
Arnaud Cachia
Arnaud Cachia Université Paris Cité
Marie-Odile Krebs
Marie-Odile Krebs Université Paris Cité
Francine Chassoux
Francine Chassoux Université Paris Cité
Fabrice Chrétien
Fabrice Chrétien Université Paris Cité
Charlotte Cordonnier
Charlotte Cordonnier University of Lille
Pascale Piolino
Pascale Piolino Université Paris Cité
Yves Samson
Yves Samson Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine or healthcare careers beyond the MD route, a wide range of online options are available that can significantly boost your qualifications or help you shift specializations. These online pathways offer flexibility and accessibility—key for busy students or working professionals.

Nursing is a popular field with several advanced programs. If you’re already an RN, exploring asn to fnp bridge programs is a streamlined way to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Alternatively, the rn to bsn online with no clinicals option allows RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for additional clinical hours.

Those with an interest in administrative or leadership roles may consider online mha programs, which prepare graduates for management in healthcare settings. Nutrition is also a growing field, and students can complete nutrition degrees online to start a career promoting patient and public health.

No matter your career goals, online degrees offer a flexible and respected pathway to advance within the diverse world of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Oppenheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles