World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Catherine Oppenheim

Catherine Oppenheim

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17658 16597 590 561 559 20821

Catherine Oppenheim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine Oppenheim between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine Oppenheim published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 71 publications in 2008. 31 of the 660 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 71. Peak 71 publications in 2008. 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 71 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

660 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine Oppenheim: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 3
1991 2
1992 3
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 7
1999 7
2000 11
2001 5
2002 5
2003 9
2004 28
2005 31
2006 33
2007 22
2008 71
2009 24
2010 9
2011 15
2012 20
2013 27
2014 31
2015 31
2016 20
2017 19
2018 20
2019 31
2020 27
2021 34
2022 25
2023 24
2024 25
2025 30
2026 1
Total 660
Download as CSV

Catherine Oppenheim publications per year - data summary

  • Catherine Oppenheim, a Medicine scholar from Université Paris Cité, has 660 publications recorded across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 71 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1995 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 17.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 17.8 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 105 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2002: 53 publications (4.1 per year); 2003-2015: 351 publications (27.0 per year); 2016-2026: 256 publications (23.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Catherine Oppenheim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 559 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 559
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine Oppenheim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Catherine Oppenheim, a Medicine scholar from Université Paris Cité, records 559 publications - the 67th percentile of the discipline.
  • 67% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Catherine Oppenheim, and about 33% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Catherine Oppenheim ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Catherine Oppenheim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Catherine Oppenheim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Catherine Oppenheim, a Medicine scholar from Université Paris Cité, records 79 D-Index - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Catherine Oppenheim, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Catherine Oppenheim ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Catherine Oppenheim is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has a substantial publication record in the field of medicine, particularly focused on neurology and related subfields. Their research intersects multiple areas including neurology, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, genetics, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their main fields of interest encompass acute ischemic stroke management, glioma diagnosis and treatment, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, meningioma and schwannoma management, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, as well as intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research.

Catherine Oppenheim has contributed to several notable recent papers including:

  • Brain MRI Findings in Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Study (2020) published in Radiology
  • Standardization of brain MR images across machines and protocols: bridging the gap for MRI-based radiomics (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • Neurologic and neuroimaging findings in patients with COVID-19 (2020) published in Neurology
  • Prediction of Early Neurological Deterioration in Individuals With Minor Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion Intended for Intravenous Thrombolysis Alone (2021) published in JAMA Neurology
  • Tissue no-reflow despite full recanalization following thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke with proximal occlusion: A clinical study (2020) published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Their frequent co-authors include Joseph Benzakoun, Johan Pallud, Alexandre Roux, Wagih Ben Hassen, and Edouard Dezamis. This collaborative network indicates active engagement in multidisciplinary research contributions.

Publication venues where Catherine Oppenheim has been active often comprise:

  • Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Neurology
  • Stroke
  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of Neuro-Oncology

The scientist's work spans many significant topics within neurology and associated disciplines, reflecting a broad and diverse research portfolio centered around neurological diseases, stroke management, brain imaging, and neuro-oncology.

Best Publications

  • Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial

    Serge Bracard;Xavier Ducrocq;Jean Louis Mas;Marc Soudant

  • Neuroimaging in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

    C. Lamy;C. Oppenheim;J. F. Méder;J. L. Mas

  • False-negative Diffusion-weighted MR Findings in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Catherine Oppenheim;Ruxandra Stanescu;Didier Dormont;Sophie Crozier

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Prediction of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

    C. Oppenheim;Y. Samson;R. Manaï;T. Lalam

  • Brain MRI Findings in Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Study.

    Stéphane Kremer;François Lersy;Jérome de Sèze;Jean-Christophe Ferré

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Does Aneurysmal Wall Enhancement on Vessel Wall-MRI Help to Distinguish Stable From Unstable Intracranial Aneurysms?

    Myriam Edjlali;Jean-Christophe Gentric;Christine Régent-Rodriguez;Denis Trystram

  • Incidence, causes and predictors of neurological deterioration occurring within 24 h following acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with pathophysiological implications

    Pierre Seners;Guillaume Turc;Catherine Oppenheim;Jean-Claude Baron

  • Diffusion tensor imaging in early Alzheimer's disease

    Olivier Naggara;Catherine Oppenheim;Dorothée Rieu;Nadine Raoux

  • DWI Lesions and TIA Etiology Improve the Prediction of Stroke After TIA

    David Calvet;Emmanuel Touzé;Catherine Oppenheim;Guillaume Turc

  • Is there an apparent diffusion coefficient threshold in predicting tissue viability in hyperacute stroke

    Catherine Oppenheim;Cécile Grandin;Yves Samson;Anne Smith

  • Which MR-derived perfusion parameters are the best predictors of infarct growth in hyperacute stroke? Comparative study between relative and quantitative measurements.

    Cécile B. Grandin;Thierry P. Duprez;Anne M. Smith;Catherine Oppenheim

  • Brain networks of spatial awareness: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging tractography

    Marika Urbanski;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Sebastian Rodrigo;Marco Catani

  • Incidence and Predictors of Early Recanalization After Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Pierre Seners;Guillaume Turc;Benjamin Maïer;Jean-Louis Mas

  • Risk of Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and High Cerebral Microbleed Burden: A Meta-analysis.

    Georgios Tsivgoulis;Georgios Tsivgoulis;Ramin Zand;Aristeidis H. Katsanos;Aristeidis H. Katsanos;Guillaume Turc

  • Linac radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: results in 169 patients.

    Michel Schlienger;Dan Atlan;Dimitrios Lefkopoulos;Louis Merienne

  • Neurologic and neuroimaging findings in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective multicenter study.

    Stéphane Kremer;François Lersy;Mathieu Anheim;Hamid Merdji

  • Diffusion-weighted imaging patterns of brain damage associated with cerebral venous thrombosis

    Denis Ducreux;Catherine Oppenheim;Xavier Vandamme;Didier Dormont

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Claude Baron
Jean-Claude Baron Université Paris Cité
Jean-Louis Mas
Jean-Louis Mas Université Paris Cité
Didier Dormont
Didier Dormont Université Paris Cité
Arnaud Cachia
Arnaud Cachia Université Paris Cité
Marie-Odile Krebs
Marie-Odile Krebs Université Paris Cité
Francine Chassoux
Francine Chassoux Université Paris Cité
Fabrice Chrétien
Fabrice Chrétien Université Paris Cité
Charlotte Cordonnier
Charlotte Cordonnier University of Lille
Pascale Piolino
Pascale Piolino Université Paris Cité
Yves Samson
Yves Samson Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine or healthcare careers beyond the MD route, a wide range of online options are available that can significantly boost your qualifications or help you shift specializations. These online pathways offer flexibility and accessibility—key for busy students or working professionals.

Nursing is a popular field with several advanced programs. If you’re already an RN, exploring asn to fnp bridge programs is a streamlined way to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Alternatively, the rn to bsn online with no clinicals option allows RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for additional clinical hours.

Those with an interest in administrative or leadership roles may consider online mha programs, which prepare graduates for management in healthcare settings. Nutrition is also a growing field, and students can complete nutrition degrees online to start a career promoting patient and public health.

No matter your career goals, online degrees offer a flexible and respected pathway to advance within the diverse world of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Oppenheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles