World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 55 1955 1768 936 835 134 26754

Andrew C. Porter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew C. Porter between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew C. Porter published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1988. 4 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1988. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1967 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew C. Porter: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 3
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 4
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 4
1988 7
1989 3
1990 3
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 5
1995 4
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 6
2003 3
2004 4
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 2
2009 5
2010 3
2011 6
2012 3
2013 4
2014 5
2015 7
2016 3
2017 2
2018 1
2019 6
2020 3
2021 1
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 1
Total 143
Download as CSV

Andrew C. Porter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Porter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 134 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 134
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew C. Porter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew C. Porter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137 55
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

Andrew C. Porter is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with significant contributions in Clinical Psychology, Education, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, as well as work related to Information Systems and Management and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics addressed in their research include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Educational Assessment and Improvement, School Choice and Performance, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, and Poisoning and overdose treatments.

Porter has published recent papers with the following titles and details:

  • Low levels of discriminant validity between self-report measures of self-esteem, shame, and self-criticism: Implications for the measurement of self-evaluation and creation of the Negative Self-Evaluation Scale., 2022, Psychological Assessment
  • Inside school turnaround: What drives success?, 2022, Journal of Educational Change
  • Nonsuicidal Self-injury, Suicide Planning, and Suicide Attempts Among High-risk Adolescents Prior to Psychiatric Hospitalization, 2021, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Average ages of onset and time to transition between self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: Retrospective evidence from two developmentally distinct samples, 2024, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Can either using cognitive science principles or improving teacher content knowledge boost student achievement in middle school science?, 2024, Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Catherine R. Glenn
  • Todd M. Bishop
  • Kirsten Lee Hill
  • Laura M. Desimone
  • Tonya Wolford

Porter's research has appeared in various journals, with multiple publications in the Journal of Psychiatric Research, as well as in the Journal of Educational Change, Journal of Affective Disorders, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, and Psychological Assessment.

They have received recognition in the form of the Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award from the American Educational Research Association in 2015, along with being named a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2008.

Best Publications

  • What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers

    Michael S. Garet;Andrew C Porter;Laura Desimone;Beatrice F Birman

  • Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study

    Laura M Desimone;Andrew C. Porter;Michael S. Garet;Kwang Suk Yoon

  • Designing Professional Development That Works.

    Beatrice F. Birman;Laura Desimone;Andrew C. Porter;Michael S. Garet

  • Common Core Standards The New U.S. Intended Curriculum

    Andrew Porter;Jennifer McMaken;Jun Hwang;Rui Yang

  • Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice

    Andrew C. Porter

  • Synthesis of Research on Good Teaching: Insights from the Work of the Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Andrew C. Porter;Jere Brophy

  • Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership: Connections to Research, Professional Standards, and Current Practices

    Ellen Goldring;Andrew Porter;Joseph Murphy;Stephen N. Elliott

  • Upgrading High School Mathematics Instruction: Improving Learning Opportunities for Low-Achieving, Low-Income Youth:

    Adam Gamoran;Andrew C. Porter;John Smithson;Paula A. White

  • Leadership for learning: a research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors1

    Joseph Murphy;Stephen N. Elliott;Ellen Goldring;Andrew C. Porter

  • A Curriculum out of Balance The Case of Elementary School Mathematics

    Andrew Porter

  • Does Professional Development Change Teaching Practice? Results from a Three-Year Study.

    Andrew C. Porter;Michael S. Garet;Laura Desimone;Kwang Suk Yoon

  • Designing Effective Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program [and] Technical Appendices.

    Michael S. Garet;Beatrice F. Birman;Andrew C. Porter;Laura Desimone

  • Annual Research Review: A meta-analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents.

    Catherine R. Glenn;Catherine R. Glenn;Evan M. Kleiman;John Kellerman;Olivia Pollak

  • Learning-Centered Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation.

    Joseph Murphy;Stephen N. Elliott;Ellen Goldring;Andrew C. Porter

  • The Evaluation of Principals: What and How Do States and Urban Districts Assess Leadership?

    Ellen Goldring;Xiu Chen Cravens;Joseph Murphy;Andrew C. Porter

  • Creating a System of School Process Indicators

    Andrew C. Porter

  • Formal and Informal Mentoring: Complementary, Compensatory, or Consistent?

    Laura M. Desimone;Eric D. Hochberg;Andrew C. Porter;Morgan S. Polikoff

  • Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Youth

    Unknown

  • Defining, Developing, and Using Curriculum Indicators. CPRE Research Report Series.

    Andrew C. Porter;John L. Smithson

  • Do Textbooks Dictate the Content of Mathematics Instruction in Elementary Schools

    Donald J. Freeman;Andrew C. Porter

  • Instructional Alignment as a Measure of Teaching Quality

    Morgan S. Polikoff;Andrew C. Porter

  • Providing Effective Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program.

    Andrew C. Porter;Michael S. Garet;Laura M. Desimone;Beatrice F. Birman

  • Methodological Advances in Cross-National Surveys of Educational Achievement

    Andrew C. Porter;Adam Gamoran

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen Goldring
Ellen Goldring Vanderbilt University
Joseph Murphy
Joseph Murphy Vanderbilt University
Laura M. Desimone
Laura M. Desimone University of Delaware
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Adam Gamoran
Adam Gamoran University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert E. Floden
Robert E. Floden Michigan State University
William H. Schmidt
William H. Schmidt Michigan State University
Jason A. Grissom
Jason A. Grissom Vanderbilt University
Jere Brophy
Jere Brophy Michigan State University
Nelson Flores
Nelson Flores University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in building a career in the Social Sciences and Humanities, online degrees offer flexible and accelerated pathways. Many students are now choosing online psychology masters to gain specialized knowledge while continuing to work or manage other commitments. These programs are designed to be affordable and accessible, helping you take the next step toward roles in counseling, research, or social services.

If your goal is to move into leadership or advanced academic roles, consider edd online programs. These doctorate-level degrees can be completed on a fast track, preparing you for educational leadership positions or policy development.

Students in a hurry to earn credentials can explore online master degree programs that can be finished in just one year. For undergraduates, there are also accelerated bachelor's degree options, which allow you to complete a four-year degree much faster.

These flexible online programs open doors to a wide range of career opportunities in education, public policy, social advocacy, and more—all while fitting your studies into your busy lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew C. Porter

Trending Scientists