World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
6742
World Ranking
6333
National Ranking
284

Janine Gibert publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janine Gibert sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Janine Gibert D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janine Gibert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janine Gibert is affiliated with Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France. Their academic profile focuses on scientific research, although specific details about publications, co-authors, or research topics are not documented.

No records of recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are available in the provided data. As such, there is no detailed information on the kinds of journals or conferences where their work has appeared.

Similarly, no book publications or awards have been listed, and no particular fields or subfields of study have been identified.

Without data on main topics of work or specific research themes, it is not possible to elaborate on the scientist's specialized areas of investigation or contributions to science.

The available information confirms Janine Gibert is currently active in the academic community, with no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Subterranean Ecosystems: A Truncated Functional Biodiversity

    Janine Gibert;Louis Deharveng

  • Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation.

    T. Lefébure;Christophe Douady;M. Gouy;Janine Gibert

  • A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts?

    Peter Trontelj;Christophe J. Douady;Cene Fišer;Janine Gibert

  • 1 – Basic Attributes of Groundwater Ecosystems and Prospects for Research

    J. Gibert;J.A. Stanford;M.-J. Dole-Olivier;J.V. Ward

  • Phylogeography of a subterranean amphipod reveals cryptic diversity and dynamic evolution in extreme environments.

    T. Lefébure;C. J. Douady;M. Gouy;P. Trontelj

  • The boundaries of river systems: the metazoan perspective

    J. V. Ward;G. Bretschko;M. Brunke;D. Danielopol

  • Linkages between Aquatic Sediment Biota and Life Above Sediments as Potential Drivers of Biodiversity and Ecological Processes

    Margaret A. Palmer;Alan P. Covich;Sam Lake;Peter Biro

  • A Perspective on the Permeability of the Surface Freshwater-Groundwater Ecotone

    Philippe Vervier;Janine Gibert;Pierre Marmonier;Marie-José Dole-Olivier

  • Global Change and the Biodiversity of Freshwater Ecosystems: Impacts on Linkages between Above-Sediment and Sediment Biota

    Phillip S Lake;Margaret A Palmer;Peter Biro;Jonathan Cole

  • Dynamics of solutes and dissolved oxygen in shallow urban groundwater below a stormwater infiltration basin

    T. Datry;Florian Malard;Janine Gibert

  • Groundwater biodiversity in Europe.

    L. Deharveng;F. Stoch;J. Gibert;A. Bedos

  • Testing dispersal and cryptic diversity in a widely distributed groundwater amphipod (Niphargus rhenorhodanensis).

    T. Lefébure;C.J. Douady;F. Malard;J. Gibert

  • Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: synthesis and perspectives

    Janine Gibert;David C. Culver;Marie-Jose Dole-Olivier;Florian Malard

  • Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: an introduction.

    Janine Gibert;David C. Culver

  • Response of invertebrate assemblages to increased groundwater recharge rates in a phreatic aquifer

    Thibault Datry;Florian Malard;Janine Gibert

  • Invertebrate bioturbation can reduce the clogging of sediment: an experimental study using infiltration sediment columns

    Geraldine Nogaro;Florian Mermillod‐Blondin;Frederique François‐ Carcaillet;Jean‐Paul Gaudet

  • Groundwater/surface water ecotones : biological and hydrological interactions and management options

    Janine Gibert;Jacques Mathieu;Frédéric Fournier

  • Distribution of Dissolved Organic Carbon and Bacteria at the Interface between the Rhône River and Its Alluvial Aquifer

    Pierre Marmonier;Dominique Fontvieille;Janine Gibert;Vladimir Vanek

  • The use of invertebrates in ground water monitoring: A rising research field

    Florian Malard;Sandrine Plenet;Janine Gibert

  • Do tubificid worms influence the fate of organic matter and pollutants in stormwater sediments

    Florian Mermillod-Blondin;G. Nogaro;T. Datry;Florian Malard

  • Linkages between aquatic sediment biota and life above sediments as potential drivers of biodiversity

    Palmer;A. P. Covich;S. Lake;P. Biro

Frequent Co-Authors

Florian Malard
Florian Malard Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Florian Mermillod-Blondin
Florian Mermillod-Blondin Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Pierre Marmonier
Pierre Marmonier Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Christophe J. Douady
Christophe J. Douady Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
David C. Culver
David C. Culver American University
Thibault Datry
Thibault Datry Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Louis Deharveng
Louis Deharveng French National Museum of Natural History
Boris Sket
Boris Sket University of Ljubljana
Christian Griebler
Christian Griebler University of Vienna
Willem Goedkoop
Willem Goedkoop Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a wide range of related fields. If you’re interested in human impact on the environment or ecosystems, you might also consider careers in counseling, psychology, or human services. These disciplines often intersect, especially when exploring environmental education, community outreach, or behavioral science.

Many professionals pursue specialized online degrees to broaden their expertise. For example, a child and adolescent psychology masters can prepare you for roles in ecological education for young people. If affordability is your priority, exploring the cheapest online master's in counseling options may be the right step for community-based or conservation counseling work.

Those with a focus on behavioral research or mental health as it relates to climate change may seek out best online clinical psychology programs. For those looking to quickly enter the workforce in advocacy or support roles, an accelerated human services degree online can be a valuable credential.

Best Scientists Citing Janine Gibert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles