World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
5887
World Ranking
7781
National Ranking
349

Louis Deharveng publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis Deharveng sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 184 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Louis Deharveng D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis Deharveng sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Louis Deharveng is affiliated with the French National Museum of Natural History in France. Their research spans multiple disciplines within biological and earth sciences, with a particular emphasis on ecology, taxonomy, and biodiversity.

Their main fields of study include Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable focus on the subfields of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Oceanography, Paleontology, Ecology, and Global and Planetary Change. Their scientific work covers core topics such as Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies, Study of Mite Species, Marine and Environmental Studies, Subterranean Biodiversity and Taxonomy, Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology, Hemiptera Insect Studies, and Plant and Animal Studies.

Deharveng has contributed frequently alongside a set of collaborators, including Sopark Jantarit, Katthaleeya Surakhamhaeng, Charlene Janion-Scheepers, Mikhail Potapov, and Anne Bedòs. These coauthors have appeared in their publications with varying frequency, indicating ongoing collaborative research efforts.

The scientist's publication record includes several recent notable papers, such as:

  • "Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology" (2020) published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "Towards a global synthesis of Collembola knowledge - challenges and potential solutions" (2020) in HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • "Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails" (2023) in Nature Communications
  • "Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems" (2022) in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "A conservation roadmap for the subterranean biome" (2021) in Conservation Letters

The frequent publication venues for their work include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Diversity, ZooKeys, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. These venues reflect a spectrum of platforms for disseminating research on biodiversity, taxonomy, and ecological studies.

Best Publications

  • Subterranean Ecosystems: A Truncated Functional Biodiversity

    Janine Gibert;Louis Deharveng

  • New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?

    Philippe Grandcolas;Jérôme Murienne;Tony Robillard;Laure Desutter-Grandcolas

  • Scientists' Warning on the Conservation of Subterranean Ecosystems

    Stefano Mammola;Pedro Cardoso;David C Culver;Louis Deharveng

  • The mid-latitude biodiversity ridge in terrestrial cave fauna

    David C. Culver;Louis Deharveng;Anne Bedos;Julian J. Lewis

  • Current use of and future needs for soil invertebrate functional traits in community ecology

    Benjamin Pey;Johanne Nahmani;Apolline Auclerc;Yvan Capowiez

  • Linking species, traits and habitat characteristics of Collembola at European scale

    Sandrine Salmon;Jean-François Ponge;Sophie Gachet;Louis Deharveng

  • Groundwater biodiversity in Europe.

    L. Deharveng;F. Stoch;J. Gibert;A. Bedos

  • Recent advances in Collembola systematics

    Louis Deharveng

  • New Species in the Old World: Europe as a Frontier in Biodiversity Exploration, a Test Bed for 21st Century Taxonomy

    Benoît Fontaine;Kees van Achterberg;Miguel Angel Alonso-Zarazaga;Rafael Araujo

  • Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: synthesis and perspectives

    Janine Gibert;David C. Culver;Marie-Jose Dole-Olivier;Florian Malard

  • The European union’s 2010 target: Putting rare species in focus

    B. Fontaine;P. Bouchet;K. van Achterberg;A.M.T. Bongers

  • Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails

    Unknown

  • A molecular phylogeny shows the single origin of the Pyrenean subterranean Trechini ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

    Arnaud Faille;Ignacio Ribera;L. Deharveng;Charles Bourdeau

  • Systematic revision of Entomobryidae (Collembola) by integrating molecular and new morphological evidence

    Feng Zhang;Louis Deharveng

  • Challenging species delimitation in Collembola: cryptic diversity among common springtails unveiled by DNA barcoding

    D. Porco;A. Bedos;Penelope Greenslade;C. Janion

  • Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology

    Stefano Mammola;Stefano Mammola;Isabel R Amorim;Maria E Bichuette;Paulo A V Borges

  • Biological invasions in soil: DNA barcoding as a monitoring tool in a multiple taxa survey targeting European earthworms and springtails in North America

    David Porco;David Porco;Thibaud Decaëns;Louis Deharveng;Samuel W. James;Samuel W. James

  • Coupling non-destructive DNA extraction and voucher retrieval for small soft-bodied Arthropods in a high-throughput context: the example of Collembola.

    David Porco;Rodolphe Rougerie;Louis Deharveng;Paul Hebert

  • Towards a global synthesis of Collembola knowledge – challenges and potential solutions

    Anton M Potapov;Bruno Cavalcante Bellini;Steven L Chown;Louis Deharveng

  • DNA barcodes for soil animal taxonomy

    Rodolphe Rougerie;Thibaud Decaëns;Louis Deharveng;David Porco

  • Cryptic Diversity in the Ubiquist Species Parisotoma notabilis (Collembola, Isotomidae): A Long-Used Chimeric Species?

    David Porco;Mikhail Potapov;Anne Bedos;Galina Busmachiu

  • Response of Soil Fauna to Landscape Heterogeneity: Determining Optimal Scales for Biodiversity Modeling

    G. Chust;G. Chust;J. L. Pretus;D. Ducrot;A. Bedòs

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Culver
David C. Culver American University
Steven L. Chown
Steven L. Chown Monash University
Janine Gibert
Janine Gibert Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Florian Malard
Florian Malard Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Stefano Mammola
Stefano Mammola National Research Council (CNR)
Paul D. N. Hebert
Paul D. N. Hebert University of Guelph
Thibaud Decaëns
Thibaud Decaëns University of Montpellier
Jean-François Ponge
Jean-François Ponge French National Museum of Natural History
Diana M. P. Galassi
Diana M. P. Galassi University of L'Aquila
Christian Griebler
Christian Griebler University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and professional trajectories. Many students interested in these fields also explore disciplines like history, library science, and communication sciences to enhance research or academic skills.

Interdisciplinary understanding is highly valued. For example, the cheapest online masters in history can help students gain historical perspective on human-environment interactions. Similarly, obtaining a library science degree can equip you with valuable research and information management skills, which are essential in scientific work.

If your interests expand into human communication and its biological foundations, accredited online programs exist as well. You can pursue asha approved online speech pathology programs or, for those coming from different majors, enter the field through an slp bridge program online.

These pathways demonstrate the flexibility of online learning, allowing you to combine ecological and evolutionary knowledge with complementary fields for broader career options.

Best Scientists Citing Louis Deharveng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles