World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
58
Citations
11090
World Ranking
2587
National Ranking
198

Andrew D. Austin publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Austin sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 348 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Andrew D. Austin D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Austin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew D. Austin is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and has a primary research focus within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their scholarly output includes a significant concentration in the subfield of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, along with detailed work in Insect Science, Ecology, Paleontology, and Genetics.

Their research topics broadly cover areas such as Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny, insect-plant interactions and control, fossil insects in amber, subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy, plant and animal studies, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, and marine ecology and invasive species.

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Austral Entomology, Journal of Hepatology, and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew D. Austin are the following:

  • eDNA in subterranean ecosystems: Applications, technical aspects, and future prospects (2022) - The Science of The Total Environment
  • An integrated phylogenetic reassessment of the parasitoid superfamily Platygastroidea (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupomorpha) results in a revised familial classification (2021) - Systematic Entomology
  • Evidence for speciation underground in diving beetles (Dytiscidae) from a subterranean archipelago (2020) - Evolution
  • Detection of the rare Australian endemic blind cave eel (Ophisternon candidum) with environmental DNA: implications for threatened species management in subterranean environments (2020) - Hydrobiologia
  • Parallel decay of vision genes in subterranean water beetles (2022) - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Norman F. Johnson
  • Zachary Lahey
  • Elijah J. Talamas
  • Andrew Polaszek
  • Simon van Noort

Best Publications

  • Molecular phylogeny of the insect order Hymenoptera: apocritan relationships.

    Mark Dowton;Andrew D. Austin

  • Hymenoptera: Evolution, Biodiversity and Biological Control

    Andrew Austin;Mark Dowton

  • Evolutionary dynamics of a mitochondrial rearrangement "hot spot" in the Hymenoptera.

    M Dowton;A D Austin

  • Systematics, evolution, and biology of scelionid and platygastrid wasps.

    A.D. Austin;N.F. Johnson;M. Dowton

  • The function of spider egg sacs in relation to parasitoids and predators, with special reference to the Australian fauna

    A. D. Austin

  • Mitochondrial gene rearrangements as phylogenetic characters in the invertebrates: the examination of genome 'morphology'

    M. Dowton;L. R. Castro;A. D. Austin

  • Characterization of 67 Mitochondrial tRNA Gene Rearrangements in the Hymenoptera Suggests That Mitochondrial tRNA Gene Position Is Selectively Neutral

    Mark Dowton;Stephen L. Cameron;Stephen L. Cameron;Jessica I. Dowavic;Andy D. Austin

  • Increased Congruence Does Not Necessarily Indicate Increased Phylogenetic Accuracy—The Behavior of the Incongruence Length Difference Test in Mixed-Model Analyses

    Mark Dowton;Mark Dowton;Andrew D. Austin

  • Simultaneous analysis of 16S, 28S, COI and morphology in the Hymenoptera: Apocrita – evolutionary transitions among parasitic wasps☆

    Mark Dowton;Andrew D. Austin

  • Phylogeny of the parasitic microgastroid subfamilies (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on sequence data from seven genes, with an improved time estimate of the origin of the lineage.

    Nicholas Murphy;Jonathan C. Banks;James B. Whitfield;Andrew D. Austin

  • Insects ‘Down Under’– Diversity, endemism and evolution of the Australian insect fauna: examples from select orders

    Andrew D Austin;David K Yeates;Gerasimos Cassis;Murray J Fletcher

  • Comparison of preservation techniques for DNA extraction from hymenopterous insects.

    N. Dillon;A. D. Austin;E. Bartowsky

  • Phylogenetic relationships among the microgastroid wasps (Hymenoptera: braconidae): combined analysis of 16S and 28S rDNA genes and morphological data.

    M. Dowton;M. Dowton;A.D. Austin

  • Is the Australian subterranean fauna uniquely diverse

    Michelle T. Guzik;Andrew D. Austin;Steven J. B. Cooper;Steven J. B. Cooper;Mark S. Harvey

  • Frequent mitochondrial gene rearrangements at the hymenopteran nad3-nad5 junction.

    Mark Dowton;Lyda R. Castro;Sarah L. Campbell;Sharmilla D. Bargon

  • Application of 16S rDNA-DGGE to examine the microbial ecology associated with a social wasp Vespula germanica.

    Andrew F. Reeson;T. Jankovic;M. L. Kasper;S. Rogers

  • Synopsis of Australasian Microgastrinae (Hymenoptera : Braconidae), with a key to genera and description of new taxa

    AD Austin;PC Dangerfield

  • The ovipositor system of Scelionid and Platygastrid wasps (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea): Comparative morphology and phylogenetic implications

    A. D. Austin;and S. A. Field

  • Phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of mitochondrial genome sequence data in the Hymenoptera--a lineage with both rapidly and slowly evolving mitochondrial genomes.

    Mark Dowton;Stephen L. Cameron;Andy D. Austin;Michael F. Whiting

  • Subterranean archipelago in the Australian arid zone: mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of amphipods from central Western Australia.

    Steven J. B. Cooper;John H. Bradbury;John H. Bradbury;Kathleen M. Saint;Remko Leys

  • Annotated Keys to the Genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera)

    Andrew D. Austin

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. B. Cooper
Steven J. B. Cooper University of Adelaide
William F. Humphreys
William F. Humphreys Australian Museum
Mark Dowton
Mark Dowton University of Wollongong
Mark S. Harvey
Mark S. Harvey Australian Museum
Donald L. J. Quicke
Donald L. J. Quicke Chulalongkorn University
Mark I. Stevens
Mark I. Stevens South Australian Museum
Stephen C. Donnellan
Stephen C. Donnellan South Australian Museum
Philip Weinstein
Philip Weinstein University of Adelaide
José M. Facelli
José M. Facelli University of Adelaide
Stephen L. Cameron
Stephen L. Cameron Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to many related fields and online programs. Students interested in applying ecological concepts in healthcare or communication may be surprised at the variety of online degrees available. For example, if you hold a non-SLP major but want to become a speech-language pathologist, consider enrolling in an slp bridge program designed to help career changers meet prerequisites efficiently.

Similarly, those with non-nursing backgrounds have the option to pivot into nursing by pursuing a non nursing degree to bsn online, accelerating entry to this in-demand profession. As you explore related health science roles, it’s valuable to know the earning potential of specialized positions. Discover how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make across different states, as salary can be a major factor in career planning.

For those eager to progress rapidly, look into how to become a nurse practitioner in the shortest possible time. These diverse pathways illustrate how a foundation in ecology and evolution can support flexible, interdisciplinary careers—many of them accessible through online study in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. Austin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles