What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Pedagogy
- Curriculum
- Mathematics education
Her primary areas of investigation include Professional development, Pedagogy, Medical education, Professional learning community and Mathematics education.
Her research in Professional development is mostly concerned with Professional studies.
Her Educational research study, which is part of a larger body of work in Pedagogy, is frequently linked to Research design, bridging the gap between disciplines.
Her work in the fields of Medical education, such as Faculty development, intersects with other areas such as Primer and Publication.
Her study on Active learning and Science teachers is often connected to Coherence and Ordinary least squares as part of broader study in Mathematics education.
Her Active learning research encompasses a variety of disciplines, including Duration and Sample.
Her most cited work include:
- What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers (3541 citations)
- Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study (1097 citations)
- Designing Professional Development That Works. (603 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Laura M. Desimone mostly deals with Mathematics education, Professional development, Pedagogy, Faculty development and Publishing.
As part of her studies on Mathematics education, she often connects relevant subjects like Teacher induction.
Her study in the field of Professional learning community and Professional studies is also linked to topics like Longitudinal study and Duration.
In the subject of general Pedagogy, her work in Active learning, Academic achievement and Science education is often linked to Academic standards, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
Her studies deal with areas such as Teacher retention and Educational leadership as well as Faculty development.
Her work on Cognitively Guided Instruction is typically connected to Preparedness and Operationalization as part of general Teaching method study, connecting several disciplines of science.
She most often published in these fields:
- Mathematics education (52.83%)
- Professional development (49.06%)
- Pedagogy (47.17%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2020)?
- Professional development (49.06%)
- Faculty development (18.87%)
- Publishing (16.98%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of study are Professional development, Faculty development, Publishing, Curriculum and Medical education.
Her Professional development research entails a greater understanding of Pedagogy.
Laura M. Desimone studies Pedagogy, namely Active learning.
Her work on Teacher retention as part of general Medical education study is frequently linked to Administrative support, Autonomy and Turnover, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
Her work in Publication incorporates the disciplines of Principal and Mathematics education.
Her work on Classroom management and Teaching method as part of her general Mathematics education study is frequently connected to Operationalization, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
Between 2016 and 2020, her most popular works were:
- Instructional Coaching as High-Quality Professional Development. (55 citations)
- Inside the Black Box: Examining Mediators and Moderators of a Middle School Science Intervention: (7 citations)
- Job‐embedded Learning (3 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Pedagogy
- Curriculum
- Mathematics education
Professional development, Faculty development, Organizational learning, Knowledge management and Teaching method are her primary areas of study.
Her work in Professional development is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Set.
Her research in Set intersects with topics in Active learning and Medical education.
Her Teaching method study contributes to a more complete understanding of Mathematics education.
Her Evidence-based practice study spans across into fields like Pedagogy and Empirical evidence.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
