World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
45
Citations
11291
World Ranking
4753
National Ranking
377

Reid Tingley publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reid Tingley sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Reid Tingley D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reid Tingley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Reid Tingley is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work covers several key topics such as Species Distribution and Climate Change, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, and Identification and Quantification in Food.

Frequent coauthors in Reid Tingley's research include David G. Chapple, Shai Meiri, Arman Pili, Uri Roll, and Andrew R. Weeks.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • "Niche shifts and environmental non-equilibrium undermine the usefulness of ecological niche models for invasion risk assessments" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny" (2022, PLoS Biology)
  • "Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019-2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions" (2021, Diversity and Distributions)
  • "Multispecies models reveal that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than backpack electrofishing for conducting fish surveys in freshwater streams" (2020, Molecular Ecology)
  • "Defining and evaluating predictions of joint species distribution models" (2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution)

Reid Tingley has published frequently in journals such as Global Ecology and Biogeography, Ecological Informatics, Biological Conservation, PLoS Biology, and Diversity and Distributions.

Best Publications

  • Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

    A. Guisan;R. Tingley;J. B. Baumgartner;I. Naujokaitis-Lewis

  • Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

    Antoine Guisan;Reid Tingley;John B. Baumgartner;Ilona Naujokaitis‐Lewis

  • Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

    Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita;José J. Lahoz-Monfort;Jane Elith;Ascelin Gordon

  • Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM)

    Laura J. Pollock;Reid Tingley;William K. Morris;Nick Golding

  • Realized niche shift during a global biological invasion

    Reid Tingley;Marcelo Vallinoto;Fernando Sequeira;Michael R. Kearney

  • Statistical approaches to account for false-positive errors in environmental DNA samples.

    José J. Lahoz-Monfort;Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita;Reid Tingley

  • Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader.

    Adam S. Smart;Reid Tingley;Andrew R. Weeks;Anthony R. van Rooyen

  • Smart Moves: Effects of Relative Brain Size on Establishment Success of Invasive Amphibians and Reptiles

    Joshua J. Amiel;Reid Tingley;Richard Shine

  • Assessing the cost-efficiency of environmental DNA sampling

    Adam S. Smart;Andrew R. Weeks;Anthony R. van Rooyen;Alana Moore;Alana Moore

  • When trends intersect: The challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios

    Jenny A. Davis;Anthony P. O'Grady;Allan P. Dale;Angela H. Arthington

  • Microclimate modelling at macro scales: a test of a general microclimate model integrated with gridded continental‐scale soil and weather data

    Michael R. Kearney;Alireza Shamakhy;Reid Tingley;David J. Karoly

  • Desiccation Risk Drives the Spatial Ecology of an Invasive Anuran (Rhinella marina) in the Australian Semi-Desert

    Reid Tingley;Richard Shine

  • Dealing with false-positive and false-negative errors about species occurrence at multiple levels

    Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita;José Joaquín Lahoz-Monfort;Anthony R. van Rooyen;Andrew R. Weeks

  • The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city

    Kirsten M. Parris;Marco Amati;Sarah A. Bekessy;Danielle Dagenais

  • Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes

    Ayesha I.T. Tulloch;Ayesha I.T. Tulloch;Patricia Sutcliffe;Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis;Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis;Reid Tingley

  • Addressing knowledge gaps in reptile conservation

    Reid Tingley;Shai Meiri;David G. Chapple

  • Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny

    Unknown

  • Life-history traits and extrinsic threats determine extinction risk in New Zealand lizards

    Reid Tingley;Rod Hitchmough;David Gregory Chapple;David Gregory Chapple

  • Quantifying extinction risk and forecasting the number of impending Australian bird and mammal extinctions

    Hayley M. Geyle;John C.Z. Woinarski;G. Barry Baker;Chris R. Dickman

  • Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria

    David A. Keith;David A. Keith;Michael Mahony;Harry Hines;Jane Elith

  • Niche shifts and environmental non-equilibrium undermine the usefulness of ecological niche models for invasion risk assessments.

    Arman N. Pili;Arman N. Pili;Reid Tingley;Emerson Y. Sy;Mae Lowe L. Diesmos

  • New Weapons in the Toad Toolkit: A Review of Methods to Control and Mitigate the Biodiversity Impacts of Invasive Cane Toads (Rhinella Marina)

    Reid Tingley;Georgia Ward-Fear;Lin Schwarzkopf;Matthew J. Greenlees

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Chapple
David G. Chapple Monash University
Richard Shine
Richard Shine Macquarie University
Andrew Weeks
Andrew Weeks University of Liverpool
Michael A. McCarthy
Michael A. McCarthy University of Melbourne
Ben L. Phillips
Ben L. Phillips University of Melbourne
John C. Z. Woinarski
John C. Z. Woinarski Charles Darwin University
Michael R. Kearney
Michael R. Kearney University of Melbourne
Damian Michael
Damian Michael Australian National University
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita
Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita University of Melbourne
Jane Melville
Jane Melville Museums Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse career options in research, conservation, and education. For those interested in applying scientific thinking to healthcare, transitioning into nursing is a viable path. Many students with science backgrounds pursue a non nursing degree to bsn online, allowing them to build on their existing education and quickly enter the healthcare workforce.

Accelerated options such as the accelerated bsn programs are ideal for those seeking flexible and fast-tracked degree completion, letting students earn qualifications in as little as six months. After obtaining a BSN, graduates may want to explore advanced practice roles. Resources on how to become a np outline the shortest pathways to becoming a nurse practitioner, which is an in-demand specialty in the U.S.

Career advancement is supported by competitive salaries. Check data on psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state to compare opportunities and earning potential across the country. These flexible online degree programs create exciting options for those passionate about both science and service.

Best Scientists Citing Reid Tingley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles