World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Albert E. Dahlberg

Albert E. Dahlberg

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
58
Citations
9304
World Ranking
2116
National Ranking
1048

Albert E. Dahlberg publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert E. Dahlberg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 160 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Albert E. Dahlberg D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert E. Dahlberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert E. Dahlberg is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a specialization in infectious diseases and neurology.

The scientist's work addresses topics related to COVID-19, including clinical research studies, investigations into the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the long-term effects of COVID-19.

Albert E. Dahlberg has published articles in the following venues:

  • mSphere

Among their recent publications is a 2020 paper titled Can Unconventional Immunomodulatory Agents Help Alleviate COVID-19 Symptoms and Severity? published in mSphere. This work has been cited 23 times.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Stephen W. Mamber
  • Steven Krakowka
  • Jeffrey L. Osborn
  • Lloyd Saberski
  • Ryan G. Rhodes

Their research contributions span the subfields of infectious diseases and neurology within the broader field of medicine.

Best Publications

  • Electrophoretic characterization of bacterial polyribosomes in agarose-acrylamide composite gels

    Albert E. Dahlberg;C.Wesley Dingman;Andrew C. Peacock

  • A Conformational Switch in Escherichia coli 16S Ribosomal RNA During Decoding of Messenger RNA

    J. Stephen Lodmell;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • The functional role of ribosomal RNA in protein synthesis

    Albert E. Dahlberg

  • Reading frame switch caused by base-pair formation between the 3' end of 16S rRNA and the mRNA during elongation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli.

    R. B. Weiss;D. M. Dunn;A. E. Dahlberg;J. F. Atkins

  • The Polypeptide Tunnel System in the Ribosome and Its Gating in Erythromycin Resistance Mutants of L4 and L22

    Irene S. Gabashvili;Steven T. Gregory;Mikel Valle;Robert Grassucci

  • A single base change in the Shine-Dalgarno region of 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli affects translation of many proteins

    William F. Jacob;Melvin Santer;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • Analysis of mutations at residues A2451 and G2447 of 23S rRNA in the peptidyltransferase active site of the 50S ribosomal subunit

    Jill Thompson;Daniel F. Kim;Michael O'Connor;Kate R. Lieberman

  • Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic--RNA interactions.

    E A De Stasio;D Moazed;H F Noller;A E Dahlberg

  • Erythromycin Resistance Mutations in Ribosomal Proteins L22 and L4 Perturb the Higher Order Structure of 23 S Ribosomal RNA

    Steven T. Gregory;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • The Control of Ribonucleic Acid Synthesis during Amino Acid Deprivation in Escherichia coli

    Robert A. Lazzarini;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • The involvement of two distinct regions of 23 S ribosomal RNA in tRNA selection.

    Michael O'Connor;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • Decoding Fidelity at the Ribosomal A and P Sites: Influence of Mutations in three Different Regions of the Decoding Domain in 16S rRNA

    Michael O'Connor;Cheryl L. Thomas;Robert A. Zimmermann;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • Electrophoretic transfer of DNA, RNA and protein onto diazobenzyloxymethyl (DBM) - paper.

    Edmund J. Stellwag;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • Structural analysis of kasugamycin inhibition of translation.

    Barbara S Schuwirth;J Michael Day;J Michael Day;Cathy W Hau;Cathy W Hau;Gary R Janssen

  • Enhancement of translation by the downstream box does not involve base pairing of mRNA with the penultimate stem sequence of 16S rRNA.

    Michael O’Connor;Tsuneaki Asai;Catherine L. Squires;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • Binding of ribosomal protein S1 of Escherichia coli to the 3' end of 16S rRNA.

    Albert E. Dahlberg;James E. Dahlberg

  • Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome.

    Dale M. Cameron;Jill Thompson;Paul E. March;Albert E. Dahlberg

  • A structural basis for streptomycin-induced misreading of the genetic code

    Hasan Demirci;Frank Murphy;Eileen Murphy;Steven T. Gregory

  • The protein synthesis inhibitors, oxazolidinones and chloramphenicol, cause extensive translational inaccuracy in vivo.

    Jill Thompson;Michael O'Connor;Jonathan A Mills;Albert E Dahlberg

  • Mutant 16S ribosomal RNA: a codon-specific translational suppressor.

    E J Murgola;K A Hijazi;H U Göringer;A E Dahlberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine L. Squires
Catherine L. Squires Tufts University
Christian W Zwieb
Christian W Zwieb The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Claudio O. Gualerzi
Claudio O. Gualerzi University of Camerino
Jamie H. D. Cate
Jamie H. D. Cate University of California, Berkeley
James E. Dahlberg
James E. Dahlberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Patrick A. Limbach
Patrick A. Limbach University of Cincinnati
Robert A. Grassucci
Robert A. Grassucci Columbia University
Joachim Frank
Joachim Frank Columbia University
Eric Cundliffe
Eric Cundliffe University of Leicester
Steven Krakowka
Steven Krakowka The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Molecular Biology but interested in clinical or patient-care roles, there are several accelerated online nursing degrees and career paths to consider. For example, understanding how long to become nurse practitioner can help you map out a quicker route to advanced practice nursing, which combines medical science with hands-on care.

Fast-track options, such as a 6-month rn to bsn program, are designed for registered nurses who want to upgrade their credentials rapidly and open doors to more specialized healthcare roles. Similarly, those with an associate degree in nursing can pursue asn to fnp programs to seamlessly transition toward a Family Nurse Practitioner career.

For individuals with a science background but no prior nursing experience, online direct entry msn programs provide a direct path to advanced nursing degrees. These flexible, online options let you combine a foundation in molecular sciences with applied healthcare, broadening your professional opportunities in both clinical and research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Albert E. Dahlberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles