World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 8934 8385 501 477 791 34496

Wilhelm Bloch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wilhelm Bloch between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wilhelm Bloch published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 24.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2021. 27 of the 854 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2021. 1992: 4 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 38 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 44 publications 2014: 40 publications 2015: 47 publications 2016: 53 publications 2017: 44 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 49 publications 2020: 55 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 16 publications
1992 2026

854 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wilhelm Bloch: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 4
1993 0
1994 1
1995 5
1996 3
1997 5
1998 12
1999 16
2000 20
2001 11
2002 10
2003 9
2004 25
2005 27
2006 44
2007 38
2008 19
2009 29
2010 29
2011 33
2012 34
2013 44
2014 40
2015 47
2016 53
2017 44
2018 41
2019 49
2020 55
2021 59
2022 10
2023 2
2024 9
2025 11
2026 16
Total 854
Download as CSV

Wilhelm Bloch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilhelm Bloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 791 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 791
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Wilhelm Bloch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilhelm Bloch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wilhelm Bloch is affiliated with the German Sport University Cologne in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology.

The main topics covered in Bloch's research include blood properties and coagulation, COVID-19 clinical research studies, cancer survivorship and care, exercise and physiological responses, erythrocyte function and pathophysiology, long-term effects of COVID-19, and hemoglobinopathies and related disorders.

Bloch has published research in several notable scientific journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
  • Biology
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Nature Cell Biology
  • Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Selected recent papers include:

  • Niche stiffening compromises hair follicle stem cell potential during ageing by reducing bivalent promoter accessibility (2021), Nature Cell Biology
  • The oxygen dissociation curve of blood in COVID-19 (2021), American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
  • Even patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection show prolonged altered red blood cell morphology and rheological parameters (2022), Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
  • Persistent JunB activation in fibroblasts disrupts stem cell niche interactions enforcing skin aging (2021), Cell Reports
  • Basement Membrane Remodeling Controls Endothelial Function in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (2020), American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology

Bloch frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Marijke Grau
  • Dieter Böning
  • Wolfgang M. Kuebler
  • Moritz Schumann
  • Jonas Zacher

Their research publications demonstrate a focus on topics that intersect physiology and pathology, especially within the context of respiratory and hematological conditions, as well as the long-term health impacts of COVID-19. The presence of multiple publications on blood function, erythrocyte morphology, and respiratory medicine highlights an integrated approach to understanding disease mechanisms and physiological responses.

Best Publications

  • Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts

    Martin Breitbach;Toktam Bostani;Wilhelm Roell;Ying Xia

  • Perlecan Maintains the Integrity of Cartilage and Some Basement Membranes

    Mercedes Costell;Erika Gustafsson;Attila Aszódi;Matthias Mörgelin

  • Ultraviolet-radiation-induced inflammation promotes angiotropism and metastasis in melanoma

    Tobias Bald;Thomas Quast;Jennifer Landsberg;Meri Rogava

  • Red blood cells express a functional endothelial nitric oxide synthase.

    Petra Kleinbongard;Rainer Schulz;Tienush Rassaf;Thomas Lauer

  • NEMO/IKKγ-Deficient Mice Model Incontinentia Pigmenti

    Marc Schmidt-Supprian;Wilhelm Bloch;Gilles Courtois;Klaus Addicks

  • Acute BDNF and cortisol response to low intensity exercise and following ramp incremental exercise to exhaustion in humans.

    Sandra Rojas Vega;Heiko K. Strüder;Bertha Vera Wahrmann;Annette Schmidt

  • Engraftment of engineered ES cell–derived cardiomyocytes but not BM cells restores contractile function to the infarcted myocardium

    Eugen Kolossov;Toktam Bostani;Wilhelm Roell;Martin Breitbach

  • A crucial role of beta 1 integrins for keratinocyte migration in vitro and during cutaneous wound repair.

    Richard Grose;Caroline Hutter;Wilhelm Bloch;Irmgard Thorey

  • Increased IgE-dependent mast cell activation and anaphylactic responses in mice lacking the calcium-activated nonselective cation channel TRPM4.

    Rudi Vennekens;Rudi Vennekens;Jenny Olausson;Marcel Meissner;Wilhelm Bloch

  • Interleukin-4 Receptor α Signaling in Myeloid Cells Controls Collagen Fibril Assembly in Skin Repair.

    Johanna A. Knipper;Sebastian Willenborg;Jürgen Brinckmann;Wilhelm Bloch

  • The adaptor protein FADD protects epidermal keratinocytes from necroptosis in vivo and prevents skin inflammation

    Marion C. Bonnet;Daniela Preukschat;Patrick-Simon Welz;Geert van Loo

  • Epidermal progenitors give rise to Merkel cells during embryonic development and adult homeostasis

    Alexandra Van Keymeulen;Guilhem Mascre;Khalil Kass Youseff;Itamar Harel

  • Characterization of key mechanisms in transmigration and invasion of mesenchymal stem cells

    Caroline Steingen;Florian Brenig;Laura Baumgartner;Joachim Schmidt

  • Functional Characteristics of ES Cell–derived Cardiac Precursor Cells Identified by Tissue-specific Expression of the Green Fluorescent Protein

    E. Kolossov;B.K. Fleischmann;Q. Liu;W. Bloch

  • In vitro secreting profile of human mesenchymal stem cells.

    Timo Schinköthe;Wilhelm Bloch;Annette Schmidt

  • Aldara activates TLR7-independent immune defence

    Anne Walter;Matthias Schäfer;Virginia Cecconi;Claudia Matter

  • Postnatally Induced Inactivation of gp130 in Mice Results in Neurological, Cardiac, Hematopoietic, Immunological, Hepatic, and Pulmonary Defects

    Ulrich A.K. Betz;Wilhelm Bloch;Maries van den Broek;Kanji Yoshida

  • Beta 1 integrin is essential for teratoma growth and angiogenesis.

    Wilhelm Bloch;Erik Forsberg;Sylvia Lentini;Cord Brakebusch

  • Clinical exercise interventions in prostate cancer patients—a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    Freerk T. Baumann;Eva M. Zopf;Wilhelm Bloch

  • The angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin impairs blood vessel maturation during wound healing

    Wilhelm Bloch;Katharina Huggel;Takako Sasaki;Richard Grose

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus Addicks
Klaus Addicks University of Cologne
Bernd K. Fleischmann
Bernd K. Fleischmann University of Bonn
Sabine Werner
Sabine Werner ETH Zurich
Thomas Decker
Thomas Decker University of Vienna
Michael Hallek
Michael Hallek University of Cologne
Thomas Krieg
Thomas Krieg University of Cologne
Jürgen Hescheler
Jürgen Hescheler University of Cologne
Andreas Schneeweiss
Andreas Schneeweiss German Cancer Research Center
Matthias Hammerschmidt
Matthias Hammerschmidt University of Cologne
Reinhard Fässler
Reinhard Fässler Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine doesn't always mean attending medical school. There are a variety of online degrees and career pathways in healthcare that can open doors to rewarding roles. Many students start their journey with nursing, which offers diverse career opportunities and flexible educational options.

Prospective nurses can take advantage of cheap online nursing programs to earn their initial qualifications without heavy student debt. For those who are already registered nurses, pursuing a BSN is a strategic step, and the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs provide an affordable pathway to career advancement.

For individuals interested in advanced practice and research, there are reputable phd nursing programs online that let you continue working while studying. Even those without a nursing background can quickly transition into advanced nursing roles via direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online.

Exploring these online options can provide more flexible, affordable, and accessible routes to a meaningful career in healthcare, both within and beyond traditional medical pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Wilhelm Bloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles