World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
18647
World Ranking
6571
National Ranking
18

Thomas J. Conway publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Conway sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 77 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas J. Conway D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Conway sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Conway is affiliated with University College Dublin in Ireland. Their research spans multiple fields of study, including Engineering, Energy, and Arts and Humanities. The subfields of study connected to their work include Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their main research topics cover Advanced Battery Technologies Research, Advanced DC-DC Converters, Real-Time Systems Scheduling, Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, Climate Change Policy and Economics, and Irish and British Studies.

Recent publications by Thomas J. Conway include the following papers:

  • An Isolated Active Balancing and Monitoring System for Lithium Ion Battery Stacks Utilizing a Single Transformer Per Cell, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
  • Estimating the emissions reductions from supply-side fossil fuel interventions, 2024, Energy Economics

Frequent co-authors associated with Thomas J. Conway are:

  • Brian Prest
  • Harrison Fell
  • Deborah Gordon

The scientist has published in venues such as:

  • IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
  • Energy Economics

Best Publications

  • Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks

    Josep G. Canadell;Corinne Le Quéré;Michael R. Raupach;Christopher B. Field

  • Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide

    Corinne Le Quéré;Corinne Le Quéré;Michael R. Raupach;Josep G. Canadell;Gregg Marland

  • An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker

    Wouter Peters;A. R. Jacobson;C. Sweeney;A. E. Andrews

  • Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO2 Sink Due to Recent Climate Change

    Corinne Le Quéré;Christian Rödenbeck;Erik T. Buitenhuis;Thomas J. Conway

  • Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Global Air Sampling Network

    Thomas J. Conway;Pieter P. Tans;Lee S. Waterman;Kirk W. Thoning

  • Response to Comments on "Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO2 Sink Due to Recent Climate Change"

    Corinne Le Quéré;Corinne Le Quéré;Christian Rödenbeck;Erik T. Buitenhuis;Thomas J. Conway

  • Update on CO2 emissions

    P. Friedlingstein;R. A. Houghton;G. Marland;J. Hackler

  • Global Carbon Sinks and Their Variability Inferred from Atmospheric O2 and δ13C

    M. Battle;M. L. Bender;P. P. Tans;J. W. C. White

  • The global carbon budget 1959-2011

    C. Le Quere;R.J. Andres;T.A. Boden;T. Conway

  • Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study

    Gabrielle Pétron;Gabrielle Pétron;Gregory Frost;Gregory Frost;Benjamin R. Miller;Benjamin R. Miller;Adam I. Hirsch;Adam I. Hirsch

  • The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide

    James T. Randerson;Matthew V. Thompson;Thomas J. Conway;Inez Y. Fung

  • CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements

    F. Chevallier;P. Ciais;T. J. Conway;T. Aalto

  • Atmospheric gas concentrations over the past century measured in air from firn at the South Pole

    M. Battle;M. Bender;T. Sowers;P. P. Tans

  • On the global distribution, seasonality, and budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) and some similarities to CO2

    S. A. Montzka;P. Calvert;B. D. Hall;J. W. Elkins

  • Stratospheric Mean Ages and Transport Rates from Observations of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrous Oxide

    K. A. Boering;S. C. Wofsy;B. C. Daube;H. R. Schneider

  • Latitudinal distribution of the sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide derived from surface observations and an atmospheric transport model

    Pieter P. Tans;Thomas J. Conway;Takakiyo Nakazawa

  • Global atmospheric CO2 distribution and variations from 1968–1982 NOAA/GMCC CO2 flask sample data

    W. D. Komhyr;R. H. Gammon;T. B. Harris;L. S. Waterman

  • An Overview of Regional Experiments on Biomass Burning Aerosols and Related Pollutants in Southeast Asia: From BASE-ASIA and the Dongsha Experiment to 7-SEAS

    Neng Huei Lin;Si Chee Tsay;Hal B. Maring;Ming Cheng Yen

  • Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in the remote global troposphere, 1981-1984

    T. J. Conway;P. Tans;L. S. Waterman;K. W. Thoning

  • Distribution of chemical tracers in the eastern equatorial Pacific during and after the 1982–1983 El Niño/Southern Oscillation event

    Richard A. Feely;Richard H. Gammon;Bruce A. Taft;Patricia E. Pullen

Frequent Co-Authors

John B. Miller
John B. Miller National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Pieter P. Tans
Pieter P. Tans National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Edward J. Dlugokencky
Edward J. Dlugokencky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James W. C. White
James W. C. White University of Colorado Boulder
Ray L. Langenfelds
Ray L. Langenfelds Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Corinne Le Quéré
Corinne Le Quéré University of East Anglia
Robert J. Andres
Robert J. Andres Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Douglas E. J. Worthy
Douglas E. J. Worthy Environment and Climate Change Canada
Andrew R. Jacobson
Andrew R. Jacobson Earth System Research Laboratory
James H. Butler
James H. Butler National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that address pressing ecological and societal challenges. For those interested in Earth’s physical processes, pursuing geology degrees online provides in-depth knowledge of the planet’s structure, enabling careers in resource management and environmental consulting.

Spatial data plays a crucial role in environmental analysis. Professionals often turn to top academic pathways such as the top GIS masters programs to develop expertise in geographic information systems. These skills enhance capabilities in mapping, environmental monitoring, and urban planning.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and lead public sector initiatives, leadership-focused education is vital. The best online MPA programs equip students with management and administrative skills necessary for impactful roles in government agencies and nonprofits.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is also essential in environmental work. Exploring social dynamics through a sociology bachelor degree online offers valuable perspectives on how communities interact with their environments, aiding in the development of effective sustainability programs.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Conway

Recently Published Articles