World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 30 9666 9249 3464 3207 120 9001

Andrew R. Jacobson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew R. Jacobson between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew R. Jacobson published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2022. 12 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2022. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 7 publications
1980 2026

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew R. Jacobson: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 5
2004 2
2005 1
2006 6
2007 8
2008 4
2009 7
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 9
2014 9
2015 4
2016 7
2017 11
2018 6
2019 5
2020 5
2021 6
2022 13
2023 7
2024 4
2025 5
2026 7
Total 155
Download as CSV

Andrew R. Jacobson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. Jacobson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 120 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 120
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew R. Jacobson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew R. Jacobson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12 30
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Climate change
  • Meteorology

His primary scientific interests are in Carbon dioxide, Climatology, Biosphere, Carbon cycle and Atmospheric sciences. His studies in Carbon dioxide integrate themes in fields like Trace gas emissions, Fossil fuel, Fossil fuel combustion and Environmental engineering. His study on Ocean current is often connected to Flux and Magnitude as part of broader study in Climatology.

The Biosphere study combines topics in areas such as Global and Planetary Change, Climate change, North Atlantic oscillation and Ecosystem, Terrestrial ecosystem. His study in Carbon cycle is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Carbon sink and Latitude. His study in the field of Radiosonde is also linked to topics like Boundary.

His most cited work include:

  • An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker (660 citations)
  • Constraining global air-sea gas exchange for CO2 with recent bomb 14C measurements (379 citations)
  • Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO2 (360 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Andrew R. Jacobson mostly deals with Atmospheric sciences, Climatology, Carbon dioxide, Carbon cycle and Meteorology. His research integrates issues of Biosphere, Inversion, Sink, Carbon sink and Terrestrial ecosystem in his study of Atmospheric sciences. His Biosphere study combines topics in areas such as Soil carbon and Ecosystem.

His work on Northern Hemisphere as part of general Climatology study is frequently linked to Inverse, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Carbon dioxide study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Trace gas emissions, Environmental engineering and Fossil fuel combustion. His Carbon cycle course of study focuses on Southern Hemisphere and Ocean observations.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (44.34%)
  • Climatology (41.51%)
  • Carbon dioxide (26.42%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Atmospheric sciences (44.34%)
  • Biogeosciences (7.55%)
  • Climatology (41.51%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Andrew R. Jacobson mainly investigates Atmospheric sciences, Biogeosciences, Climatology, Carbon sink and Flux. The study incorporates disciplines such as Sink and Net ecosystem exchange in addition to Atmospheric sciences. His work on Zonal and meridional as part of his general Climatology study is frequently connected to Oxygen, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

His Carbon sink study incorporates themes from Surface ocean, Carbon cycle and Terrestrial ecosystem. His Carbon cycle research includes elements of In situ and Tropics. Andrew R. Jacobson interconnects Boreal and Carbon dioxide in the investigation of issues within Data assimilation.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network (34 citations)
  • The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network (34 citations)
  • Quantifying the Impact of Atmospheric Transport Uncertainty on CO2 Surface Flux Estimates. (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Climate change
  • Meteorology

His main research concerns Atmospheric sciences, Flux, Carbon cycle, Carbon sink and Observation data. His Atmospheric sciences study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Hydrography and Climatology. His Carbon cycle research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Middle latitudes, Inversion and Environmental protection.

His research in Carbon sink intersects with topics in In situ, Tropics, Carbon dioxide and Data assimilation. His Observation data study spans across into fields like Meteorology, Co2 flux, Magnitude and Boreal. Andrew R. Jacobson has researched Zonal and meridional in several fields, including Climate system, Northern Hemisphere and Troposphere.

Best Publications

  • An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker

    Wouter Peters;A. R. Jacobson;C. Sweeney;A. E. Andrews

  • Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO2

    Nicolas Gruber;Manuel Gloor;Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Scott C. Doney

  • Constraining global air-sea gas exchange for CO2 with recent bomb 14C measurements

    Colm Sweeney;Emanuel Gloor;Andrew R. Jacobson;Robert M. Key

  • Climatology of the planetary boundary layer over the continental United States and Europe

    Dian J. Seidel;Yehui Zhang;Anton Beljaars;Jean-Christophe Golaz

  • Global atmospheric carbon budget: results from an ensemble of atmospheric CO2 inversions.

    P. Peylin;R. M. Law;K. R. Gurney;F. Chevallier

  • Inverse estimates of anthropogenic CO2 uptake, transport, and storage by the ocean

    Mikaloff Fletcher;Mikaloff Fletcher;Nicolas Gruber;Andrew Jacobson;Scott Doney

  • A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion

    R.J. Andres;T.A. Boden;F.-M. Bréon;P. Ciais

  • Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean pCO2 Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)

    Christian Rödenbeck;Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Nicolas Gruber;Yosuke Iida

  • North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison

    D. N. Huntzinger;W. M. Post;Y. Wei;A. M. Michalak

  • A joint atmosphere‐ocean inversion for surface fluxes of carbon dioxide: 1. Methods and global‐scale fluxes

    Andrew R. Jacobson;Andrew R. Jacobson;Sara E.Mikaloff Fletcher;Sara E.Mikaloff Fletcher;Nicolas Gruber;Nicolas Gruber;Jorge Louis Sarmiento

  • The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design

    D. N. Huntzinger;C. Schwalm;A. M. Michalak;K. Schaefer

  • Seven years of recent European net terrestrial carbon dioxide exchange constrained by atmospheric observations

    W. Peters;W. Peters;M. C. Krol;G. R. van der Werf;S. Houweling

  • The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network

    Sean Crowell;David Baker;Andrew Schuh;Sourish Basu;Sourish Basu

  • Trends and regional distributions of land and ocean carbon sinks

    Jorge Louis Sarmiento;M. Gloor;N. Gruber;C. Beaulieu

  • The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data

    Y. Wei;S. Liu;D. N. Huntzinger;A. M. Michalak

  • Climate forcing and density dependence in a mountain ungulate population

    Andrew R. Jacobson;Antonello Provenzale;Achaz von Hardenberg;Bruno Bassano

  • Quantifying the Impact of Atmospheric Transport Uncertainty on CO2 Surface Flux Estimates.

    Andrew E. Schuh;Andrew R. Jacobson;Sourish Basu;Brad Weir

  • Inverse estimates of the oceanic sources and sinks of natural CO2 and the implied oceanic carbon transport

    S. E. Mikaloff Fletcher;S. E. Mikaloff Fletcher;N. Gruber;N. Gruber;A. R. Jacobson;A. R. Jacobson;M. Gloor;M. Gloor

  • Four years of global carbon cycle observed from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) version 9 and in situ data and comparison to OCO-2 version 7

    Unknown

  • A joint atmosphere-ocean inversion for surface fluxes of carbon dioxide: 2. Regional results

    Andrew R. Jacobson;Andrew R. Jacobson;Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Nicolas Gruber;Nicolas Gruber;Jorge L. Sarmiento

  • Reconciling estimates of the contemporary North American carbon balance among terrestrial biosphere models, atmospheric inversions, and a new approach for estimating net ecosystem exchange from inventory-based data

    Daniel J. Hayes;David P. Turner;Graham Stinson;A. David McGuire

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge L. Sarmiento
Jorge L. Sarmiento Princeton University
Nicolas Gruber
Nicolas Gruber ETH Zurich
Deborah N. Huntzinger
Deborah N. Huntzinger Northern Arizona University
Robert B. Cook
Robert B. Cook Oak Ridge National Laboratory
John B. Miller
John B. Miller National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Colm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Wouter Peters
Wouter Peters Wageningen University & Research
Manuel Gloor
Manuel Gloor University of Leeds
Anna M. Michalak
Anna M. Michalak Stanford University
F. Chevallier
F. Chevallier University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that complement this field. For those interested in broader interdisciplinary studies, enrolling in an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide a flexible foundation that integrates environmental topics with other disciplines.

For students aiming to specialize in Earth sciences, pursuing online geology degrees offers focused training on soil, minerals, and the physical processes of the planet, which are vital to understanding environmental challenges.

Career-oriented learners might consider advancing to a dsw program to engage with social aspects of environmental work, including policy development and community health. Such degrees emphasize leadership in social services related to environmental justice.

Additionally, those new to higher education or seeking a less intensive route may explore some of the easiest bachelor's degree options online, enabling a smoother transition into environmental studies or related fields.

Choosing the right online degree can greatly impact your career pathway, allowing you to tailor your education to market demands and personal interests within the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew R. Jacobson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles