World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
12606
World Ranking
11403
National Ranking
4930

Sharon L. Campbell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon L. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 152 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Sharon L. Campbell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon L. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sharon L. Campbell is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular emphasis on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Infectious Diseases, Physiology, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work covers various topics including Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling, Cellular Mechanics and Interactions, Melanoma and MAPK Pathways, Cellular Transport and Secretion, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Enzyme Structure and Function, and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Campbell include:

  • Channing J. Der
  • Venkat R. Chirasani
  • Henrik Dohlman
  • Guowei Yin
  • Nikolay V. Dokholyan

The majority of Campbell's publications appear in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Science Signaling
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Highlighted recent papers authored or co-authored by Campbell include:

  • Post-translational modification of RAS proteins, 2021, Current Opinion in Structural Biology
  • Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study, 2021, Cronfa (Swansea University)
  • Changes in symptomatology, reinfection, and transmissibility associated with the SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7: an ecological study, 2021, The Lancet Public Health
  • COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • A universal allosteric mechanism for G protein activation, 2021, Molecular Cell

Best Publications

  • Increasing complexity of Ras signaling

    Sharon L Campbell;Sharon L Campbell;Roya Khosravi-Far;Kent L Rossman;Geoffrey J Clark

  • A Molecular Redox Switch on p21ras STRUCTURAL BASIS FOR THE NITRIC OXIDE-p21ras INTERACTION

    Harry M. Lander;David P. Hajjar;Barbara L. Hempstead;Urooj A. Mirza

  • Copper is required for oncogenic BRAF signalling and tumorigenesis

    Donita C. Brady;Matthew S. Crowe;Michelle L. Turski;G. Aaron Hobbs

  • DBL FAMILY PROTEINS

    Ian P Whitehead;Sharon Campbell;Kent L Rossman;Channing J Der

  • Rho family proteins and Ras transformation: the RHOad less traveled gets congested

    Irene M Zohn;Sharon L Campbell;Roya Khosravi-Far;Kent L Rossman

  • Recognition and processing of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts

    Stephen G. Chaney;Sharon L. Campbell;Ekaterina Bassett;Yibing Wu

  • Vav2 is an activator of Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA.

    Karon Abe;Kent L. Rossman;Betty Liu;Kimberly D. Ritola

  • Molecular mechanism of vinculin activation and nanoscale spatial organization in focal adhesions.

    Lindsay B. Case;Michelle A. Baird;Gleb Shtengel;Sharon L. Campbell

  • A crystallographic view of interactions between Dbs and Cdc42: PH domain-assisted guanine nucleotide exchange.

    Kent L. Rossman;David K. Worthylake;Jason T. Snyder;David P. Siderovski

  • Vinculin–actin interaction couples actin retrograde flow to focal adhesions, but is dispensable for focal adhesion growth

    Ingo Thievessen;Peter M. Thompson;Sylvain Berlemont;Karen M. Plevock

  • Increasing Complexity of Ras Signal Transduction: Involvement of Rho Family Proteins

    Roya Khosravi-Far;Sharon Campbell;Kent L. Rossman;Channing J. Der

  • The solution structure of the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain: a novel ras and phospholipid binding site.

    Helen R. Mott;John W. Carpenter;Sheng Zhong;Sujoy Ghosh

  • Direct Activation of RhoA by Reactive Oxygen Species Requires a Redox-Sensitive Motif

    Amir Aghajanian;Erika S. Wittchen;Sharon L Campbell;Keith W T Burridge

  • Mutation-Specific RAS Oncogenicity Explains NRAS Codon 61 Selection in Melanoma

    Christin E. Burd;Wenjin Liu;Minh V. Huynh;Meriam A. Waqas

  • Ras interaction with two distinct binding domains in Raf-1 may be required for Ras transformation

    Jonelle K. Drugan;Roya Khosravi-Far;Michael A. White;Channing J. Der

  • 14-3-3 ζ Negatively Regulates Raf-1 Activity by Interactions with the Raf-1 Cysteine-rich Domain

    Geoffrey J. Clark;Jonelle K. Drugan;Kent L. Rossman;John W. Carpenter

  • Atypical KRASG12R Mutant Is Impaired in PI3K Signaling and Macropinocytosis in Pancreatic Cancer.

    G. Aaron Hobbs;Nicole M. Baker;Anne M. Miermont;Ryan D. Thurman

  • Mechanism of redox-mediated guanine nucleotide exchange on redox-active Rho GTPases.

    Jongyun Heo;Sharon L. Campbell

  • ROCK1 and ROCK2 are required for non-small cell lung cancer anchorage-independent growth and invasion.

    Dominico Vigil;Tai Young Kim;Ana Plachco;Andrew J. Garton

  • Abstract IA09: Copper is required for oncogenic BRAF signaling and tumorigenesis

    Donita Brady;Matt Crowe;Michelle Turski;Aaron Hobbs

Frequent Co-Authors

Channing J. Der
Channing J. Der University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Nikolay V. Dokholyan
Nikolay V. Dokholyan Pennsylvania State University
Michael D. Schaller
Michael D. Schaller West Virginia University
Carol A. Otey
Carol A. Otey University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Atsuo T. Sasaki
Atsuo T. Sasaki University of Cincinnati
Keith Burridge
Keith Burridge University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Henrik G. Dohlman
Henrik G. Dohlman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Christopher M. Counter
Christopher M. Counter Duke University
Stefan Knapp
Stefan Knapp Goethe University Frankfurt
Roya Khosravi-Far
Roya Khosravi-Far Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to diverse online degree options and rewarding career opportunities in health and science fields. For students seeking leadership roles in healthcare, pursuing a doctorate in healthcare management can lead to senior management positions in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Those interested in the pharmaceutical industry may consider enrolling in the best online pharmacy school programs. These pathways offer advanced clinical knowledge and practical skills for a career as a pharmacist or pharmaceutical researcher.

Other biology-related online degrees, such as an exercise science online degree or the best online kinesiology degree, can help you build expertise in human movement, fitness, and rehabilitation. These programs provide flexible learning opportunities and are ideal for students balancing work, life, and study.

Best Scientists Citing Sharon L. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles