World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 40 1637 1532 259 231 148 11575

Dimo Dimov publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dimo Dimov between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dimo Dimov published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2020. 27 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2020. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 10 publications
2003 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dimo Dimov: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 7
2007 7
2008 3
2009 4
2010 8
2011 7
2012 14
2013 8
2014 15
2015 10
2016 14
2017 20
2018 6
2019 12
2020 21
2021 18
2022 6
2023 11
2024 17
2025 10
Total 225
Download as CSV

Dimo Dimov publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dimo Dimov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–149 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 148 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81 148
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Dimo Dimov D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dimo Dimov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81 40
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Dimo Dimov is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of business, management, and accounting. Their research portfolio encompasses a total of 79 publications primarily focused on management of technology and innovation, organizational behavior and human resource management, business and international management, accounting, and strategy and management.

The scientist's work addresses a range of main topics including entrepreneurship studies and influences, innovation and socioeconomic development, private equity and venture capital, management and organizational studies, family business performance and succession, creativity in education and neuroscience, and innovation and knowledge management.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Toward the Emergence of Entrepreneurial Opportunities: Organizing Early-Phase New Venture Creation Support Systems, 2020, Academy of Management Review
  • Crafting and Assessing Design Science Research for Entrepreneurship, 2022, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • Look Who Is Talking... and Who Is Listening: Finding an Integrative "We" Voice in Entrepreneurial Scholarship, 2020, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • Mixing Oil with Water: Framing and Theorizing in Management Research Informed by Design Science, 2021, Designs
  • Envisioning Entrepreneurship's Future: Introducing Me-Search and Research Agendas, 2021, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Joseph Pistrui (5 publications)
  • Henrik Berglund (4 publications)
  • Pablo Muñoz (3 publications)
  • Anastasia Sergeeva (3 publications)
  • Alisha Tuladhar (3 publications)

Dimo Dimov has published multiple articles in well-known academic venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (8 publications)
  • Journal of Business Venturing Insights (6 publications)
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (4 publications)
  • Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (4 publications)
  • Journal of Business Venturing (3 publications)

In addition to journal articles, Dimo Dimov has produced scholarly work in book form. One notable publication is The Entrepreneurial Scholar, published by Edward Elgar Publishing in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process

    Jeffery S. McMullen;Dimo Dimov

  • Nascent Entrepreneurs and Venture Emergence: Opportunity Confidence, Human Capital, and Early Planning

    Dimo Dimov

  • Beyond the Single‐Person, Single‐Insight Attribution in Understanding Entrepreneurial Opportunities

    Dimo Dimov

  • Burst Bubbles or Build Steam? Entrepreneurship Education, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Intentions

    Panagiotis Piperopoulos;Dimo Dimov

  • Human capital theory and venture capital firms: Exploring ‘home runs’ and ‘strike outs’

    Dimo P. Dimov;Dean A. Shepherd

  • Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities

    Dimo Dimov

  • From Opportunity Insight to Opportunity Intention: The Importance of Person‐Situation Learning Match

    Dimo Dimov

  • The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship

    Dirk De Clercq;Dimo Dimov;Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl

  • The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures

    Pablo Muñoz;Dimo Dimov

  • Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation

    Dirk De Clercq;Dimo Dimov;Narongsak "Tek" Thongpapanl

  • Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance

    Dirk De Clercq;Dimo Dimov

  • Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions

    Dimo Dimov;Dean A. Shepherd;Kathleen M. Sutcliffe

  • When good conflict gets better and bad conflict becomes worse: the role of social capital in the conflict–innovation relationship

    Dirk De Clercq;Narongsak Thongpapanl;Dimo Dimov

  • Venture Capital Investment Strategy and Portfolio Failure Rate: A Longitudinal Study

    Dimo Dimov;Dirk De Clercq

  • Entrepreneurship and psychological disorders: How ADHD can be productively harnessed

    Johan Wiklund;Holger Patzelt;Dimo Dimov

  • The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication

    Dimo Dimov;Hana Milanov

  • Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship

    Daniel A. Lerner;Richard A. Hunt;Dimo Dimov;Dimo Dimov

  • A closer look at cross-functional collaboration and product innovativeness: Contingency effects of structural and relational context

    Dirk De Clercq;Narongsak Tek Thongpapanl;Dimo Dimov

  • Perceptions of adverse work conditions and innovative behavior: the buffering roles of relational resources

    Dirk De Clercq;Dimo Dimov;Imanol Belausteguigoitia

  • Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs: the roles of internal and external rivalry

    Dirk De Clercq;Narongsak Thongpapanl;Dimo Dimov

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk De Clercq
Dirk De Clercq Brock University
Dean A. Shepherd
Dean A. Shepherd University of Notre Dame
Johan Wiklund
Johan Wiklund Syracuse University
Holger Patzelt
Holger Patzelt Technical University of Munich
Ioana Agache
Ioana Agache Transylvania University of Brașov
Gerard George
Gerard George Singapore Management University
Bill McKelvey
Bill McKelvey University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffery S. McMullen
Jeffery S. McMullen Indiana University
Eric Gedajlovic
Eric Gedajlovic Simon Fraser University
Karl Wennberg
Karl Wennberg Stockholm School of Economics

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has unlocked new possibilities for students pursuing business and management careers in the USA. Many learners are turning to fast track school programs for quicker entry into the workforce, helping to accelerate degree completion while balancing personal and professional responsibilities.

Specialized fields are also experiencing growth. If you are interested in project delivery and the built environment, consider a construction management degree online accredited to gain leadership and planning skills specific to the construction industry. Meanwhile, those drawn to healthcare can explore online programs for healthcare administration, bridging business knowledge with healthcare operations and policy.

Cost is a significant concern for many students. Fortunately, there are affordable online business degree programs that offer flexibility and quality education without the burden of high tuition. By choosing the right program, students can advance their careers and open diverse pathways in today’s competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Dimo Dimov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles