World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 84 868 774 456 399 213 30108

Scott W. Hiebert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott W. Hiebert between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott W. Hiebert published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2023. 7 of the 277 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2023. 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 45 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1985 2025

277 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott W. Hiebert: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 5
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 2
1990 2
1991 4
1992 1
1993 3
1994 3
1995 8
1996 9
1997 6
1998 8
1999 6
2000 10
2001 7
2002 4
2003 6
2004 10
2005 7
2006 3
2007 1
2008 9
2009 3
2010 9
2011 7
2012 5
2013 13
2014 4
2015 12
2016 8
2017 9
2018 5
2019 12
2020 5
2021 9
2022 5
2023 45
2024 5
2025 2
Total 277
Download as CSV

Scott W. Hiebert publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Hiebert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 213 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89 213
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott W. Hiebert D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Hiebert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48 84
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott W. Hiebert is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these broad domains, the scientist has contributed extensively to subfields including Molecular Biology, Hematology, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Immunology.

Their work covers several principal topics in biomedical research, notably Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, RNA modifications and cancer, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, and Immune cells in cancer.

Scott W. Hiebert has authored multiple papers, several of which are recent and highlight their scientific focus. These include:

  • Definition of a small core transcriptional circuit regulated by AML1-ETO, 2020, Molecular Cell
  • Targeting MYCN-expressing triple-negative breast cancer with BET and MEK inhibitors, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Nascent transcript and single-cell RNA-seq analysis defines the mechanism of action of the LSD1 inhibitor INCB059872 in myeloid leukemia, 2020, Gene
  • Human SMARCA5 is continuously required to maintain nucleosome spacing, 2023, Molecular Cell
  • PAX3-FOXO1 coordinates enhancer architecture, eRNA transcription, and RNA polymerase pause release at select gene targets, 2022, Molecular Cell

The scientist frequently publishes in a set of journals focused on molecular and cancer biology. These publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Cell
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancer Research

Scott W. Hiebert often collaborates with a core group of co-authors, who have co-contributed to multiple publications. Notable collaborators include:

  • Kristy R. Stengel
  • Jacob Ellis
  • Monica Bomber
  • Hillary M. Layden
  • Christopher S. Williams

Best Publications

  • AML1, the Target of Multiple Chromosomal Translocations in Human Leukemia, Is Essential for Normal Fetal Liver Hematopoiesis

    Tsukasa Okuda;Jan van Deursen;Scott W Hiebert;Gerard Grosveld

  • The E2F transcription factor is a cellular target for the RB protein.

    Srikumar P. Chellappan;Srikumar P. Chellappan;Scott Hiebert;Scott Hiebert;Maria Mudryj;Maria Mudryj;Jonathan M. Horowitz

  • Direct binding of cyclin D to the retinoblastoma gene product (pRb) and pRb phosphorylation by the cyclin D-dependent kinase CDK4.

    Jun-Ya Kato;H. Matsushime;S. W. Hiebert;M. E. Ewen

  • Fusion of the TEL gene on 12p13 to the AML1 gene on 21q22 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    T R Golub;G F Barker;S K Bohlander;S W Hiebert

  • The interaction of RB with E2F coincides with an inhibition of the transcriptional activity of E2F.

    Scott W. Hiebert;Srikumar P. Chellappan;Jonathan M. Horowitz;Joseph R. Nevins

  • Identification of AML-1 and the (8;21) translocation protein (AML-1/ETO) as sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins: the runt homology domain is required for DNA binding and protein-protein interactions.

    S Meyers;J R Downing;S W Hiebert

  • ETO, a Target of t(8;21) in Acute Leukemia, Interacts with the N-CoR and mSin3 Corepressors

    Bart Lutterbach;Jennifer J. Westendorf;Bryan Linggi;Andrea Patten

  • Runt Homology Domain Proteins in Osteoblast Differentiation: AML3/CBFA1 Is a Major Component of a Bone-Specific Complex

    Chaitali Banerjee;Laura R. McCabe;Je-Yong Choi;Scott W. Hiebert

  • CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) and AML1 (CBF alpha2) synergistically activate the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor promoter.

    Dong-Er Zhang;C. J. Hetherington;S. Meyers;K. L. Rhoades

  • The t(8;21) fusion protein interferes with AML-1B-dependent transcriptional activation.

    S Meyers;N Lenny;S W Hiebert

  • Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks

    Bianca M. Sirbu;Frank B. Couch;Jordan T. Feigerle;Srividya Bhaskara

  • ETO, a target of t(8;21) in acute leukemia, makes distinct contacts with multiple histone deacetylases and binds mSin3A through its oligomerization domain.

    Joseph M. Amann;John Nip;David K. Strom;Bart Lutterbach

  • Deletion of Histone Deacetylase 3 reveals critical roles in S-phase progression and DNA damage control

    Srividya Bhaskara;Brenda J. Chyla;Joseph M. Amann;Sarah K. Knutson

  • PEBP2/CBF, the murine homolog of the human myeloid AML1 and PEBP2 beta/CBF beta proto-oncoproteins, regulates the murine myeloperoxidase and neutrophil elastase genes in immature myeloid cells.

    Issarang Nuchprayoon;Shari Meyers;Linda M. Scott;Joseph Suzow

  • Cell cycle regulation of the E2F transcription factor involves an interaction with cyclin A

    Maria Mudryj;Stephen H. Devoto;Scott W. Hiebert;Tony Hunter

  • Requirement for the histone deacetylase Hdac3 for the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages

    Xuefen Chen;Iros Barozzi;Alberto Termanini;Elena Prosperini

  • Hdac3 is essential for the maintenance of chromatin structure and genome stability.

    Srividya Bhaskara;Sarah K. Knutson;Guochun Jiang;Mahesh B. Chandrasekharan

  • E1A-dependent trans-activation of the human MYC promoter is mediated by the E2F factor

    Scott W. Hiebert;Martin Lipp;Joseph R. Nevins

  • Translocation Products in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Activate the Wnt Signaling Pathway in Hematopoietic Cells

    Carsten Müller-Tidow;Björn Steffen;Thomas Cauvet;Lara Tickenbrock

  • Identification of a nuclear matrix targeting signal in the leukemia and bone-related AML/CBF-alpha transcription factors

    Congmei Zeng;Andre J. Van Wijnen;Janet L. Stein;Shari Meyers

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith T. Wilson
Keith T. Wilson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Robert A. Lamb
Robert A. Lamb Northwestern University
Jane B. Lian
Jane B. Lian University of Vermont
Gary S. Stein
Gary S. Stein University of Vermont
John L. Cleveland
John L. Cleveland Moffitt Cancer Center
James R. Downing
James R. Downing St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Janet L. Stein
Janet L. Stein University of Vermont
Xi Chen
Xi Chen University of California, Davis
Joseph R. Nevins
Joseph R. Nevins Duke University
Rupesh Chaturvedi
Rupesh Chaturvedi Jawaharlal Nehru University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Molecular Biology in the USA, you might also be interested in related online degrees and alternative career pathways. Online education now offers convenient options for those looking to combine scientific foundations with broader interdisciplinary skills. For example, programs such as the best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees can provide flexible learning tailored to unique career goals at an affordable cost.

Students aiming for educational or administrative roles may explore the most affordable online master's in education, designed for those wishing to blend scientific expertise with teaching or curriculum development. Meanwhile, careers in libraries, information science, or research support could benefit from advanced training through the cheapest masters in library science programs.

Additionally, those interested in healthcare communication can pursue the asha approved online speech pathology programs to qualify as speech-language pathologists. These online degree options provide diverse opportunities for Molecular Biology students to expand their skills and unlock multiple career paths in science, education, and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Scott W. Hiebert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles