World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 65 398 370 185 170 152 18259

Scot Burton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scot Burton between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scot Burton published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2017. 5 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2017. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1984 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scot Burton: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 5
1990 6
1991 7
1992 3
1993 5
1994 3
1995 4
1996 4
1997 3
1998 4
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 4
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 6
2010 6
2011 3
2012 6
2013 3
2014 6
2015 8
2016 6
2017 12
2018 3
2019 6
2020 3
2021 6
2022 2
2023 1
2024 4
2025 1
Total 166
Download as CSV

Scot Burton publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot Burton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 152 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85 152
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Scot Burton D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot Burton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19 65
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Scot Burton is affiliated with the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a significant focus on Marketing. They have contributed broadly to subfields including Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, and Physiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, especially in consumer behavior and digital marketing. Key areas of study include consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, digital marketing and social media, consumer attitudes and food labeling, consumer packaging perceptions and trends, consumer market behavior and pricing, smoking behavior and cessation, and behavioral health and interventions.

Frequent publication venues for Scot Burton include:

  • Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Journal of Advertising
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Journal of Consumer Affairs

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Scot Burton are:

  • Drivers of Data Quality in Advertising Research: Differences across MTurk and Professional Panel Samples (2022), published in Journal of Advertising
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic at the Intersection of Marketing and Public Policy (2020), published in Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
  • What consumers actually know: The role of objective nutrition knowledge in processing stop sign and traffic light front-of-pack nutrition labels (2021), published in Journal of Business Research
  • Promoted claims on food product packaging: Comparing direct and indirect effects of processing and nutrient content claims (2021), published in Journal of Business Research
  • What Exactly Is Marketing and Public Policy? Insights for JPPM Researchers (2021), published in Journal of Public Policy & Marketing

Scot Burton has collaborated frequently with several scholars, including:

  • Christopher Berry
  • Jeremy Kees
  • J. Craig Andrews
  • Garrett Rybak
  • Richard G. Netemeyer

Best Publications

  • Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective.

    Donald R. Lichtenstein;Richard G. Netemeyer;Scot Burton

  • Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework

    Richard G. Netemeyer;Mark W. Johnston;Scot Burton

  • A Scale for Measuring Attitude toward Private Label Products and an Examination of its Psychological and Behavioral Correlates

    Scot Burton;Donald R. Lichtenstein;Richard G. Netemeyer;Judith A. Garretson

  • Making Healthful Food Choices: The Influence of Health Claims and Nutrition Information on Consumers’ Evaluations of Packaged Food Products and Restaurant Menu Items

    John C. Kozup;Elizabeth H. Creyer;Scot Burton

  • An Analysis of Data Quality: Professional Panels, Student Subject Pools, and Amazon's Mechanical Turk

    Jeremy Kees;Christopher Berry;Scot Burton;Kim Sheehan

  • Antecedents of private label attitude and national brand promotion attitude: similarities and differences

    Judith A. Garretson;Dan Fisher;Scot Burton

  • Trait Aspects of Vanity: Measurement and Relevance to Consumer Behavior

    Richard G. Netemeyer;Scot Burton;Donald R. Lichtenstein

  • Attacking the Obesity Epidemic: The Potential Health Benefits of Providing Nutrition Information in Restaurants

    Scot Burton;Elizabeth H. Creyer;Jeremy Kees;Kyle Huggins

  • The Relationship between Perceived and Objective Price-Quality:

    Donald R. Lichtenstein;Scot Burton

  • Cognitive Processes Used by Survey Respondents to Answer Behavioral Frequency Questions

    Edward Blair;Scot Burton

  • Consumer Generalization of Nutrient Content Claims in Advertising

    J. Craig Andrews;Richard G. Netemeyer;Scot Burton

  • The Effect of Semantic Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Reference Price Ads

    Donald R. Lichtenstein;Scot Burton;Eric J. Karson

  • TASK CONDITIONS, RESPONSE FORMULATION PROCESSES, AND RESPONSE ACCURACY FOR BEHAVIORAL FREQUENCY QUESTIONS IN SURVEYS

    Scot Burton;Edward Blair

  • THE LAST MILE: AN EXAMINATION OF EFFECTS OF ONLINE RETAIL DELIVERY STRATEGIES ON CONSUMERS

    Terry L. Esper;Thomas D. Jensen;Fernanda L. Turnipseed;Scot Burton

  • Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging.

    Jeremy Kees;Scot Burton;J. Craig Andrews;John Kozup

  • The Effects of Nutrition Package Claims, Nutrition Facts Panels, and Motivation to Process Nutrition Information on Consumer Product Evaluations:

    Scott B. Keller;Mike Landry;Jeanne Olson;Anne M. Velliquette

  • Effects of Nutrition Facts Panel Values, Nutrition Claims, and Health Claims on Consumer Attitudes, Perceptions of Disease-Related Risks, and Trust

    Judith A. Garretson;Scot Burton

  • Are Some Comparative Nutrition Claims Misleading? The Role of Nutrition Knowledge, Ad Claim Type and Disclosure Conditions

    J. Craig Andrews;Scot Burton;Richard G. Netemeyer

  • Assessing the Domain Specificity of Deal Proneness: A Field Study

    Donald R. Lichtenstein;Richard G. Netemeyer;Scot Burton

  • An examination of deal proneness across sales promotion types: A consumer segmentation perspective

    Donald R. Lichtenstein;Scot Burton;Richard G. Netemeyer

  • Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising : working paper

    J. Craig Andrews;Richard G. Netemeyer;Scot Burton

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Netemeyer
Richard G. Netemeyer University of Virginia
J. Craig Andrews
J. Craig Andrews Marquette University
Donald R. Lichtenstein
Donald R. Lichtenstein University of Colorado Boulder
Abhijit Biswas
Abhijit Biswas Wayne State University
Viswanath Venkatesh
Viswanath Venkatesh Virginia Tech
Donald A. Williamson
Donald A. Williamson Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Rodger W. Griffeth
Rodger W. Griffeth Ohio University
Julie L. Ozanne
Julie L. Ozanne University of Melbourne
Nancy Zucker
Nancy Zucker Duke University
Terry L. Esper
Terry L. Esper The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right online degree is essential for building a successful career in Business and Management. Several related programs can broaden your expertise and open doors to diverse industries.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing a health administration online degree can prepare you for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and similar organizations. Similarly, earning a healthcare administration certificate can boost your qualifications without committing to a full degree.

Accounting remains a core aspect of business management. If you are considering this path, it’s important to understand the cost of accounting degree online. Budget-friendly options are available to help you get certified and launch a rewarding financial career.

With rapid technological advancement, expertise in analytics and automation is highly valued. Exploring ai degrees online can pave the way to roles in digital business innovation and data-driven decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Scot Burton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles