World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick G. Gallagher

Patrick G. Gallagher

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
63
Citations
12536
World Ranking
1816
National Ranking
910

Patrick G. Gallagher publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick G. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 293 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Patrick G. Gallagher D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick G. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick G. Gallagher is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Hematology
  • Genetics
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Main topics of their work cover:

  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Blood properties and coagulation
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry

Gallagher has contributed to scholarly literature in various notable venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Blood
  • Journal of Perinatology
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Blood Advances

Recent publications include:

  • "Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of methemoglobinemia," 2021, American Journal of Hematology
  • "Perinatal aspects on the covid-19 pandemic: a practical resource for perinatal-neonatal specialists," 2020, Journal of Perinatology
  • "Histone Acetyltransferases p300 and CBP Coordinate Distinct Chromatin Remodeling Programs in Vascular Smooth Muscle Plasticity," 2022, Circulation
  • "Anemia in the pediatric patient," 2022, Blood
  • "Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus," 2022, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Vincent Schulz
  • Lionel Blanc
  • Laurie A. Steiner
  • Narla Mohandas
  • James Palis

Gallagher has also contributed to book publications, including one released by the American Psychological Association titled Portable PhD: Taking your psychology career beyond academia. in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Red cell membrane: past, present, and future

    Narla Mohandas;Patrick G. Gallagher

  • Mutations in the mechanotransduction protein PIEZO1 are associated with hereditary xerocytosis

    Ryan Zarychanski;Vincent P. Schulz;Brett L. Houston;Yelena Maksimova

  • Global transcriptome analyses of human and murine terminal erythroid differentiation

    Xiuli An;Xiuli An;Vincent P. Schulz;Jie Li;Kunlu Wu;Kunlu Wu

  • Sites of Regulated Phosphorylation that Control K-Cl Cotransporter Activity

    Jesse Rinehart;Yelena D. Maksimova;Jessica E. Tanis;Kathryn L. Stone

  • Ankyrin-1 mutations are a major cause of dominant and recessive hereditary spherocytosis.

    Stefan W. Eber;Jennifer M. Gonzalez;Marcia L. Lux;Alphonse L. Scarpa

  • Hereditary elliptocytosis: spectrin and protein 4.1R

    Patrick G Gallagher

  • Piezo Proteins: Regulators of Mechanosensation and Other Cellular Processes

    Sviatoslav N. Bagriantsev;Elena O. Gracheva;Patrick G. Gallagher

  • Red cell membrane disorders.

    Patrick G. Gallagher

  • Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kai Jin;Sahar Khonsari;Robyn Gallagher;Patrick Gallagher

  • Isolation and transcriptome analyses of human erythroid progenitors: BFU-E and CFU-E.

    Jie Li;John Hale;Pooja Bhagia;Pooja Bhagia;Fumin Xue

  • Novel role for EKLF in megakaryocyte lineage commitment

    Pilar Frontelo;Deepa Manwani;Mariann Galdass;Holger Karsunky

  • Proton Block and Voltage Gating Are Potassium-dependent in the Cardiac Leak Channel Kcnk3

    Coeli M.B. Lopes;Patrick G. Gallagher;Marianne E. Buck;Margaret H. Butler

  • Nonstochastic reprogramming from a privileged somatic cell state.

    Shangqin Guo;Xiaoyuan Zi;Vincent P. Schulz;Jijun Cheng

  • In vivo correction of anaemia in β-thalassemic mice by γPNA-mediated gene editing with nanoparticle delivery

    Raman Bahal;Nicole Ali McNeer;Elias Quijano;Yanfeng Liu

  • Altered subcellular localization of transcription factor TEAD4 regulates first mammalian cell lineage commitment

    Pratik Home;Biswarup Saha;Soma Ray;Debasree Dutta

  • Neonatal Sepsis 2004-2013: The Rise and Fall of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

    Matthew J. Bizzarro;Veronika Shabanova;Robert S. Baltimore;Louise-Marie Dembry

  • Perinatal aspects on the covid-19 pandemic: a practical resource for perinatal-neonatal specialists.

    Francis Mimouni;Satyan Lakshminrusimha;Stephen A. Pearlman;Tonse Raju

  • Failure of Terminal Erythroid Differentiation in EKLF-Deficient Mice Is Associated with Cell Cycle Perturbation and Reduced Expression of E2F2

    Andre M. Pilon;Murat O. Arcasoy;Holly K. Dressman;Serena E. Vayda

  • Mutations in the Gardos channel (KCNN4) are associated with hereditary xerocytosis

    Edyta Glogowska;Kimberly Lezon-Geyda;Yelena Maksimova;Vincent P. Schulz

  • Novel role for EKLF in megakaryocyte lineage commitment. Commentary

    Gerd A. Blobel;Pilar Frontelo;Deepa Manwani;Mariann Galdass

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard G. Forget
Bernard G. Forget Yale University
David M. Bodine
David M. Bodine National Institutes of Health
Narla Mohandas
Narla Mohandas New York Blood Center
Xiuli An
Xiuli An New York Blood Center
David W. Speicher
David W. Speicher The Wistar Institute
Richard A. Ehrenkranz
Richard A. Ehrenkranz Yale University
Diane S. Krause
Diane S. Krause Yale University
Samuel E. Lux
Samuel E. Lux Harvard University
Jon S. Morrow
Jon S. Morrow Yale University
David H.K. Chui
David H.K. Chui Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology can open doors to various advanced online degrees and flexible career pathways in healthcare and science. For those looking to shift into specialized nursing roles, there are online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses that allow students from non-nursing backgrounds to pursue a master’s degree efficiently.

When comparing educational institutions, understanding which school is better snhu vs wgu helps students choose programs that match their learning style, budget, and career objectives. Cost is also crucial; learners interested in advancing from a Bachelor to a Master of Science in Nursing can explore the cheapest bsn to msn online options, making graduate education more accessible.

Additionally, exploring the non profit universities offering online science and healthcare degrees ensures that students receive a quality education from accredited institutions. These pathways support professional advancement and diverse opportunities stemming from a background in molecular biology.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick G. Gallagher

Trending Scientists