World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick G. Gallagher

Patrick G. Gallagher

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 63 1816 1631 909 802 293 12536

Patrick G. Gallagher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick G. Gallagher between 1957 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick G. Gallagher published across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2007. 27 of the 409 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2007. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 7 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications
1957 2025

409 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick G. Gallagher: publications per year, 1957 to 2025
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 3
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 7
1991 8
1992 4
1993 5
1994 3
1995 6
1996 7
1997 11
1998 8
1999 13
2000 10
2001 7
2002 2
2003 3
2004 14
2005 16
2006 11
2007 27
2008 16
2009 11
2010 11
2011 20
2012 9
2013 18
2014 21
2015 16
2016 12
2017 11
2018 12
2019 10
2020 9
2021 15
2022 11
2023 10
2024 15
2025 12
Total 409
Download as CSV

Patrick G. Gallagher publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick G. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 287–296 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 293 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52 293
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick G. Gallagher D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick G. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105 63
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick G. Gallagher is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Hematology
  • Genetics
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Main topics of their work cover:

  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Blood properties and coagulation
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry

Gallagher has contributed to scholarly literature in various notable venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Blood
  • Journal of Perinatology
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Blood Advances

Recent publications include:

  • "Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of methemoglobinemia," 2021, American Journal of Hematology
  • "Perinatal aspects on the covid-19 pandemic: a practical resource for perinatal-neonatal specialists," 2020, Journal of Perinatology
  • "Histone Acetyltransferases p300 and CBP Coordinate Distinct Chromatin Remodeling Programs in Vascular Smooth Muscle Plasticity," 2022, Circulation
  • "Anemia in the pediatric patient," 2022, Blood
  • "Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus," 2022, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Vincent Schulz
  • Lionel Blanc
  • Laurie A. Steiner
  • Narla Mohandas
  • James Palis

Gallagher has also contributed to book publications, including one released by the American Psychological Association titled Portable PhD: Taking your psychology career beyond academia. in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Red cell membrane: past, present, and future

    Narla Mohandas;Patrick G. Gallagher

  • Mutations in the mechanotransduction protein PIEZO1 are associated with hereditary xerocytosis

    Ryan Zarychanski;Vincent P. Schulz;Brett L. Houston;Yelena Maksimova

  • Global transcriptome analyses of human and murine terminal erythroid differentiation

    Xiuli An;Xiuli An;Vincent P. Schulz;Jie Li;Kunlu Wu;Kunlu Wu

  • Sites of Regulated Phosphorylation that Control K-Cl Cotransporter Activity

    Jesse Rinehart;Yelena D. Maksimova;Jessica E. Tanis;Kathryn L. Stone

  • Ankyrin-1 mutations are a major cause of dominant and recessive hereditary spherocytosis.

    Stefan W. Eber;Jennifer M. Gonzalez;Marcia L. Lux;Alphonse L. Scarpa

  • Hereditary elliptocytosis: spectrin and protein 4.1R

    Patrick G Gallagher

  • Piezo Proteins: Regulators of Mechanosensation and Other Cellular Processes

    Sviatoslav N. Bagriantsev;Elena O. Gracheva;Patrick G. Gallagher

  • Red cell membrane disorders.

    Patrick G. Gallagher

  • Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kai Jin;Sahar Khonsari;Robyn Gallagher;Patrick Gallagher

  • Isolation and transcriptome analyses of human erythroid progenitors: BFU-E and CFU-E.

    Jie Li;John Hale;Pooja Bhagia;Pooja Bhagia;Fumin Xue

  • Novel role for EKLF in megakaryocyte lineage commitment

    Pilar Frontelo;Deepa Manwani;Mariann Galdass;Holger Karsunky

  • Proton Block and Voltage Gating Are Potassium-dependent in the Cardiac Leak Channel Kcnk3

    Coeli M.B. Lopes;Patrick G. Gallagher;Marianne E. Buck;Margaret H. Butler

  • Nonstochastic reprogramming from a privileged somatic cell state.

    Shangqin Guo;Xiaoyuan Zi;Vincent P. Schulz;Jijun Cheng

  • In vivo correction of anaemia in β-thalassemic mice by γPNA-mediated gene editing with nanoparticle delivery

    Raman Bahal;Nicole Ali McNeer;Elias Quijano;Yanfeng Liu

  • Altered subcellular localization of transcription factor TEAD4 regulates first mammalian cell lineage commitment

    Pratik Home;Biswarup Saha;Soma Ray;Debasree Dutta

  • Neonatal Sepsis 2004-2013: The Rise and Fall of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

    Matthew J. Bizzarro;Veronika Shabanova;Robert S. Baltimore;Louise-Marie Dembry

  • Perinatal aspects on the covid-19 pandemic: a practical resource for perinatal-neonatal specialists.

    Francis Mimouni;Satyan Lakshminrusimha;Stephen A. Pearlman;Tonse Raju

  • Failure of Terminal Erythroid Differentiation in EKLF-Deficient Mice Is Associated with Cell Cycle Perturbation and Reduced Expression of E2F2

    Andre M. Pilon;Murat O. Arcasoy;Holly K. Dressman;Serena E. Vayda

  • Mutations in the Gardos channel (KCNN4) are associated with hereditary xerocytosis

    Edyta Glogowska;Kimberly Lezon-Geyda;Yelena Maksimova;Vincent P. Schulz

  • Novel role for EKLF in megakaryocyte lineage commitment. Commentary

    Gerd A. Blobel;Pilar Frontelo;Deepa Manwani;Mariann Galdass

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard G. Forget
Bernard G. Forget Yale University
David M. Bodine
David M. Bodine National Institutes of Health
Narla Mohandas
Narla Mohandas New York Blood Center
Xiuli An
Xiuli An New York Blood Center
David W. Speicher
David W. Speicher The Wistar Institute
Richard A. Ehrenkranz
Richard A. Ehrenkranz Yale University
Diane S. Krause
Diane S. Krause Yale University
Samuel E. Lux
Samuel E. Lux Harvard University
Jon S. Morrow
Jon S. Morrow Yale University
David H.K. Chui
David H.K. Chui Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology can open doors to various advanced online degrees and flexible career pathways in healthcare and science. For those looking to shift into specialized nursing roles, there are online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses that allow students from non-nursing backgrounds to pursue a master’s degree efficiently.

When comparing educational institutions, understanding which school is better snhu vs wgu helps students choose programs that match their learning style, budget, and career objectives. Cost is also crucial; learners interested in advancing from a Bachelor to a Master of Science in Nursing can explore the cheapest bsn to msn online options, making graduate education more accessible.

Additionally, exploring the non profit universities offering online science and healthcare degrees ensures that students receive a quality education from accredited institutions. These pathways support professional advancement and diverse opportunities stemming from a background in molecular biology.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick G. Gallagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles