What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of investigation include Human resource management, Public relations, Marketing, Industrial relations and Total quality management.
His Human resource management study is focused on Knowledge management in general.
His research in Public relations is mostly concerned with Employee research.
His study on Quality is often connected to Case study research and Haulage as part of broader study in Marketing.
He works mostly in the field of Industrial relations, limiting it down to concerns involving Employee voice and, occasionally, Organizational behavior, Dialectic and Public policy.
His Total quality management study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Social science, Control, Empowerment and Quality management.
His most cited work include:
- 'Best practice' human resource management: perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion? (298 citations)
- The meanings and purpose of employee voice (256 citations)
- Devolving HR responsibility to the line: threat, opportunity or partnership? (237 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Public relations, Industrial relations, Human resource management, Management and Knowledge management are his primary areas of study.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Discipline, Order and General partnership in addition to Public relations.
His Industrial relations study deals with Labour economics intersecting with Employee participation.
His Human resource management research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Total quality management, People management and Human resources.
His work deals with themes such as Control and Quality management, which intersect with Total quality management.
His Knowledge management research incorporates elements of Quality and Organizational behavior and human resources.
He most often published in these fields:
- Public relations (39.47%)
- Industrial relations (26.32%)
- Human resource management (22.37%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2007-2020)?
- Public relations (39.47%)
- Human resource management (22.37%)
- Knowledge management (13.82%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mick Marchington spends much of his time researching Public relations, Human resource management, Knowledge management, Employee engagement and Employee participation.
His work on Employee voice as part of general Public relations research is frequently linked to Key, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
His Human resource management research entails a greater understanding of Management.
Mick Marchington has researched Knowledge management in several fields, including Quality, Consistency and Engineering ethics.
His research integrates issues of Productivity and Documentary evidence in his study of Employee engagement.
In his study, Industrial relations and Competition is strongly linked to Labour economics, which falls under the umbrella field of Employee participation.
Between 2007 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Where informality really matters: patterns of employee involvement and participation (EIP) in a non-union firm (72 citations)
- Human resource management (HRM): Too busy looking up to see where it is going longer term? (63 citations)
- The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations (50 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Management
- Social psychology
His primary scientific interests are in Public relations, Order, Embeddedness, Human resource management and Employee engagement.
His studies deal with areas such as Publishing and Project commissioning as well as Public relations.
His studies in Order integrate themes in fields like Government, Contingency theory, Action and Market economy.
His research on Human resource management concerns the broader Knowledge management.
To a larger extent, Mick Marchington studies Management with the aim of understanding Employee engagement.
His study in Line management is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Industrial relations, Job satisfaction and Construct.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
