World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
94
Citations
42494
World Ranking
919
National Ranking
83

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
42725
World Ranking
9920
National Ranking
961

Mark Walport publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Walport sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 430 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Mark Walport D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Walport sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • 2012 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2011 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Mark Walport is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, including Medicine, Environmental Science, and Psychology, with specific subfields in Oncology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Clinical Psychology.

Their work focuses on topics related to healthcare and environmental impacts, with significant contributions in areas such as COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, COVID-19 and mental health, and climate change and health impacts.

Mark Walport has published research in the following venues:

  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

One of their recent papers is titled "Executive Summary to the Royal Society report 'COVID-19: examining the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions'," published in 2023 in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

There are no frequent co-authors listed for Mark Walport.

Mark Walport has been recognized with several awards and memberships:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017)
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2012)
  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (2011)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Best Publications

  • Complement. First of two parts.

    Mark J. Walport

  • Grand challenges in global mental health

    Pamela Y. Collins;Vikram Patel;Vikram Patel;Sarah S. Joestl;Dana March;Dana March

  • Complement. Second of two parts.

    Mark J. Walport

  • Macrophage phagocytosis of aging neutrophils in inflammation. Programmed cell death in the neutrophil leads to its recognition by macrophages.

    John S Savill;Andrew H. Wyllie;Janet E Henson;Mark J Walport

  • Homozygous C1q deficiency causes glomerulonephritis associated with multiple apoptotic bodies

    M Botto;C Dell'Agnola;A E Bygrave;E M Thompson

  • A hierarchical role for classical pathway complement proteins in the clearance of apoptotic cells in vivo.

    Philip R. Taylor;Anna Carugati;Valerie A. Fadok;H. Terence Cook

  • Arthritis Critically Dependent on Innate Immune System Players

    Hong Ji;Koichiro Ohmura;Koichiro Ohmura;Umar Mahmood;David M Lee

  • The Role of Complement in the Development of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    Anthony P Manderson;Marina Botto;Mark J Walport

  • Serum amyloid P component controls chromatin degradation and prevents antinuclear autoimmunity.

    M.C.M. Bickerstaff;M. Botto;W.L. Hutchinson;J. Herbert

  • Role of Surfactant Proteins A, D, and C1q in the Clearance of Apoptotic Cells In Vivo and In Vitro: Calreticulin and CD91 as a Common Collectin Receptor Complex

    R. William Vandivier;Carol Anne Ogden;Valerie A. Fadok;Peter R. Hoffmann

  • Uncontrolled C3 activation causes membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in mice deficient in complement factor H

    Matthew C. Pickering;H. Terence Cook;Joanna Warren;Anne E. Bygrave

  • Family study of the major histocompatibility complex in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: importance of null alleles of C4A and C4B in determining disease susceptibility.

    A H Fielder;M J Walport;J R Batchelor;R I Rynes

  • The Immune System in Health and Disease

    Charles A Janeway;Paul Travers;Mark Walport;Mark J Shlomchik

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus, complement deficiency, and apoptosis.

    M C Pickering;M Botto;P R Taylor;P J Lachmann

  • C1q and systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Mark J. Walport;Kevin A. Davies;Marina Botto

  • The classical pathway is the dominant complement pathway required for innate immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in mice

    Jeremy S. Brown;Tracy Hussell;Sarah M. Gilliland;David W. Holden

  • Complement deficiency and disease.

    B.Paul Morgan;Mark J Walport

  • Polymyositis, pulmonary fibrosis and autoantibodies to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes.

    C. Marguerie;C. C. Bunn;H. L. C. Beynon;R. M. Bernstein

  • C1q, autoimmunity and apoptosis.

    Marina Botto;Mark J Walport

  • Complement facilitates early prion pathogenesis.

    M A Klein;P S Kaeser;P Schwarz;H Weyd

  • Disease-associated loss of erythrocyte complement receptors (CR1, C3b receptors) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other diseases involving autoantibodies and/or complement activation.

    G D Ross;W J Yount;M J Walport;J B Winfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. Janeway
Charles A. Janeway Yale University
Marina Botto
Marina Botto Imperial College London
Philip R. Taylor
Philip R. Taylor Cardiff University
H. Terence Cook
H. Terence Cook Imperial College London
Timothy J. Vyse
Timothy J. Vyse King's College London
Matthew C. Pickering
Matthew C. Pickering Imperial College London
Graham R. V. Hughes
Graham R. V. Hughes London Bridge Hospital
David A. Isenberg
David A. Isenberg University College London
A. B. Kay
A. B. Kay Imperial College London
B. Paul Morgan
B. Paul Morgan Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in immunology, exploring related healthcare fields can broaden career opportunities. Nursing, particularly advanced practice nursing, is a popular choice. Many students look for the which nurse practitioner program is easiest to balance rigorous study with personal commitments.

Specializing further, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) programs are gaining attention due to growing demand. Students often seek the top psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online, which are known for strong clinical placements essential for hands-on experience.

Affordability is an important factor as well. Many prospective students compare the cheapest pmhnp programs to manage tuition costs without compromising quality.

Career outlook for advanced nursing degrees such as DNP (Doctor of Nursing Practice) is promising. Understanding how much do dnps make helps students evaluate return on investment and geographic salary variations before committing to a program.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Walport

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles