World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 64 969 891 90 84 186 16999

M. J. Robertson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. J. Robertson between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. J. Robertson published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2009. 2 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2009. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 9 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1962 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. J. Robertson: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 5
1994 3
1995 1
1996 9
1997 1
1998 4
1999 4
2000 7
2001 7
2002 12
2003 9
2004 6
2005 11
2006 14
2007 9
2008 9
2009 17
2010 12
2011 4
2012 13
2013 3
2014 6
2015 7
2016 7
2017 4
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 2
Total 193
Download as CSV

M. J. Robertson publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. J. Robertson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 186–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 186 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114 186
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

M. J. Robertson D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. J. Robertson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59 64
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Agronomy
  • Ecology

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Agronomy, Crop, Agriculture, Canopy and Biomass. His study in Agronomy focuses on Cultivar and Conventional tillage. His research in Cultivar intersects with topics in Plant breeding, Arachis, Medicago sativa and Sowing.

In general Agriculture, his work in Cropping is often linked to Management control system linking many areas of study. His Cropping research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Agricultural productivity and Resource management. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Canopy, Point of delivery, Phenology, Nitrogen fixation and Grain quality is strongly linked to Irrigation.

His most cited work include:

  • An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation (1830 citations)
  • Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module (257 citations)
  • Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM (228 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Crop, Cultivar, Sowing and Water use. His Agronomy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biomass, Soil water and Horticulture. His work deals with themes such as Crop residue and Crop yield, which intersect with Crop.

His Cultivar research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Biomass, Ratooning, Plant breeding, photoperiodism and Nutrient. His Water use research integrates issues from Cropping, Agriculture, Pasture, Surface runoff and Drainage. His work in the fields of Agricultural productivity overlaps with other areas such as Context and Management control system.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (81.16%)
  • Crop (27.54%)
  • Cultivar (24.64%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2010)?

  • Agronomy (81.16%)
  • Water use (18.84%)
  • Sowing (20.29%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

M. J. Robertson focuses on Agronomy, Water use, Sowing, Agricultural engineering and Drainage. His Agronomy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Soil water and photoperiodism, Horticulture. His work focuses on many connections between Water use and other disciplines, such as Pasture, that overlap with his field of interest in Plant nutrition.

His Sowing research includes elements of Leaf size, Leaf area index and Crop. His Drainage study also includes fields such as

  • Surface runoff and related Soil classification and Soil type,
  • DNS root zone together with Gross margin. His Agroforestry research incorporates themes from Agriculture and Crop simulation model.

Between 2005 and 2010, his most popular works were:

  • Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat-field pea rotation in a semi-arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems (86 citations)
  • The Common Modelling Protocol: A hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems (81 citations)
  • Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 3. Relevance of APSIM to commercial crops. (79 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Agronomy
  • Ecology

M. J. Robertson mainly investigates Agronomy, photoperiodism, Simulation modeling, Crop yield and Plastic film. His study in Main stem, Field experiment and Plant density is carried out as part of his Agronomy studies. His studies in photoperiodism integrate themes in fields like Leaf size and Phyllochron, Sowing.

M. J. Robertson integrates many fields, such as Simulation modeling, Maximum rate, Phenology, Multiplicative model, Vernalization and Cultivar, in his works. His studies deal with areas such as Water use and Cropping, Agriculture as well as Crop yield. His Plastic film research overlaps with Conventional tillage, Crop residue, Water-use efficiency, Field pea and Mulch.

Best Publications

  • An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation

    B. A. Keating;Ps S. Carberry;Gl L. Hammer;Me E. Probert

  • APSIM - Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation

    Dean P. Holzworth;Neil I. Huth;Peter G. deVoil;Eric J. Zurcher

  • Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system

    Mario Herrero;Philip K. Thornton;Daniel Mason-D’Croz;Jeda Palmer

  • Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module

    B.A Keating;M.J Robertson;R.C Muchow;N.I Huth

  • Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM

    M. J. Robertson;P. S. Carberry;N. I. Huth;J. E. Turpin

  • The science of food security.

    Martin Barry Cole;Mary Ann Augustin;Michael John Robertson;John Michael Manners

  • The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation

    P.S. Carberry;Z. Hochman;R.L. McCown;N.P. Dalgliesh

  • Development of a generic crop model template in the cropping system model APSIM

    E. Wang;Mj J. Robertson;Gl L. Hammer;Ps S. Carberry

  • The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding; From a breeding perspective

    Phillip Jackson;Michael Robertson;Mark Cooper;Graeme Hammer

  • Root growth and water uptake during water deficit and recovering in wheat

    S. Asseng;J.T. Ritchie;A.J.M. Smucker;M.J. Robertson

  • Adoption of variable rate fertiliser application in the Australian grains industry: status, issues and prospects

    Michael Robertson;Rick Llewellyn;R Mandel;R Lawes

  • Modelling seedling emergence in chickpea as influenced by temperature and sowing depth

    A. Soltani;M.J. Robertson;B. Torabi;M. Yousefi-Daz

  • The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth, development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean

    Thomas;M.J. Robertson;S. Fukai;M.B. Peoples

  • Prospects for ecological intensification of Australian agriculture

    Z Hochman;P.S Carberry;Michael Robertson;D.S Gaydon

  • GROWTH OF SUGARCANE UNDER HIGH INPUT CONDITIONS IN TROPICAL AUSTRALIA. I. RADIATION USE, BIOMASS ACCUMULATION AND PARTITIONING

    M.J. Robertson;A.W. Wood;R.C. Muchow

  • Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat-field pea rotation in a semi-arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems

    Gaobao Huang;Renzhi Zhang;Guangdi Li;Lingling Li

  • Physiology and productivity of sugarcane with early and mid-season water deficit

    M.J. Robertson;N.G. Inman-Bamber;R.C. Muchow;A.W. Wood

  • Modeling chickpea growth and development: Phenological development

    A. Soltani;G.L. Hammer;B. Torabi;M.J. Robertson

  • How farming systems simulation can aid the development of more sustainable smallholder farming systems in southern Africa

    A.M. Whitbread;Michael Robertson;P.S. Carberry;J.P. Dimes

  • Effect of nitrogen on the time-course of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane

    R.C. Muchow;M.J. Robertson;A.W. Wood;B.A. Keating

  • The Common Modelling Protocol: A hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems

    A.D. Moore;D.P. Holzworth;N.I. Herrmann;N.I. Huth

  • Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 3. Relevance of APSIM to commercial crops.

    P. S. Carberry;Z. Hochman;J. R. Hunt;N. P. Dalgliesh

  • Production risk of canola in the semi-arid subtropics of Australia

    M. J. Robertson;J. F. Holland

  • Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model

    I. Farré;M. J. Robertson;G. H. Walton;S. Asseng

  • Improving water productivity in the Australian Grains industry—a nationally coordinated approach

    J. A. Kirkegaard;J. R. Hunt;T. M. McBeath;J. M. Lilley

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell C. Muchow
Russell C. Muchow Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Brian Keating
Brian Keating University of Queensland
Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
Holger Meinke
Holger Meinke University of Tasmania
Afshin Soltani
Afshin Soltani Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
Enli Wang
Enli Wang Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Shu Fukai
Shu Fukai University of Queensland
Murray Unkovich
Murray Unkovich University of Adelaide
Andrew D. Moore
Andrew D. Moore Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing M. J. Robertson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles