World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9969 9335 5253 4800 104 4070

Jonathan Tarbox publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Tarbox between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Tarbox published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 11 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications
2002 2025

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Tarbox: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 0
2007 3
2008 2
2009 9
2010 7
2011 13
2012 7
2013 8
2014 12
2015 4
2016 4
2017 10
2018 3
2019 4
2020 5
2021 6
2022 6
2023 4
2024 8
2025 3
Total 122
Download as CSV

Jonathan Tarbox publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Tarbox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 104
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Tarbox D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Tarbox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Tarbox is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with specific focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. Additional subfields of study include clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and social psychology.

The main topics of Jonathan Tarbox's work include behavioral and psychological studies, autism spectrum disorder research, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child and animal learning development, family and disability support research, mindfulness and compassion interventions, and health policy implementation science.

Jonathan Tarbox has published extensively in several academic venues. The notable publication venues where their work frequently appears are:

  • Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • The Psychological Record
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior Management
  • Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Jonathan Tarbox include:

  • Acceptance and Commitment Training Within the Scope of Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2020, Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • Using acceptance and commitment training to enhance the effectiveness of behavioral skills training, 2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
  • Affirming Neurodiversity within Applied Behavior Analysis, 2024, Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • Increasing Vocalizations and Echoics in Infants at Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2020, Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • Taking ACTion: 18 Simple Strategies for Supporting Children With Autism During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Behavior Analysis in Practice

Jonathan Tarbox collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Adel C. Najdowski
  • Amanda N. Chastain
  • Megan St. Clair
  • Angela Persicke
  • Alexandra Little

Best Publications

  • The effects of age and treatment intensity on behavioral intervention outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorders.

    Doreen Granpeesheh;Dennis R. Dixon;Jonathan Tarbox;Andrew M. Kaplan

  • Symptom severity and challenging behavior in children with ASD

    Jina Jang;Dennis R. Dixon;Jonathan Tarbox;Doreen Granpeesheh

  • Applied behavior analytic interventions for children with autism: a description and review of treatment research.

    Doreen Granpeesheh;Jonathan Tarbox;Dennis R Dixon

  • Randomized Trial of an eLearning Program for Training Family Members of Children with Autism in the Principles and Procedures of Applied Behavior Analysis

    Jina Jang;Dennis R. Dixon;Jonathan Tarbox;Doreen Granpeesheh

  • Evaluating the effects of Acceptance and Commitment Training on the overt behavior of parents of children with autism

    Evelyn R. Gould;Jonathan Tarbox;Lisa Coyne

  • Utilizing a Home-Based Parent Training Approach in the Treatment of Food Selectivity

    Adel C. Najdowski;Michele D. Wallace;Kara Reagon;Becky Penrod

  • A Review of Assessments for Determining the Content of Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention Programs for Autism Spectrum Disorders.

    Evelyn Gould;Dennis R. Dixon;Adel C. Najdowski;Marlena N. Smith

  • Comparing Indirect, Descriptive, and Experimental Functional Assessments of Challenging Behavior in Children with Autism

    Jonathan Tarbox;Arthur E. Wilke;Adel C. Najdowski;Rachel S. Findel-Pyles

  • Establishing metaphorical reasoning in children with autism

    Angela Persicke;Jonathan Tarbox;Jennifer Ranick;Megan St. Clair

  • A review of research on procedures for teaching safety skills to persons with developmental disabilities.

    Dennis R. Dixon;Ryan Bergstrom;Marlena N. Smith;Jonathan Tarbox

  • Teaching children with autism a basic component skill of perspective‐taking

    Evelyn Gould;Jonathan Tarbox;Denis O'Hora;Steve Noone

  • Evaluation of an eLearning tool for training behavioral therapists in academic knowledge of applied behavior analysis

    Doreen Granpeesheh;Jonathan Tarbox;Dennis R. Dixon;Catherine A. Peters

  • A Brief History of Functional Analysis and Applied Behavior Analysis

    Dennis R. Dixon;Talya Vogel;Jonathan Tarbox

  • Addressing working memory in children with autism through behavioral intervention

    Lisa Baltruschat;Marcus Hasselhorn;Jonathan Tarbox;Dennis R. Dixon

  • Intensity and Learning Outcomes in the Treatment of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    Erik Linstead;Dennis R. Dixon;Ryan French;Doreen Granpeesheh

  • Teaching Children with Autism to Detect and Respond to Sarcasm.

    Angela Persicke;Jonathan Tarbox;Jennifer Ranick;Megan St. Clair

  • Randomized trial of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for children with autism

    Doreen Granpeesheh;Jonathan Tarbox;Dennis R. Dixon;Arthur E. Wilke

  • Caregiver-conducted experimental functional analyses of inappropriate mealtime behavior.

    Adel C. Najdowski;Michele D. Wallace;Becky Penrod;Jonathan Tarbox

  • Rule-governed behavior: teaching a preliminary repertoire of rule-following to children with autism.

    Jonathan Tarbox;Carrie K Zuckerman;Michele R Bishop;Melissa L Olive

  • Parent-Implemented Procedural Modification of Escape Extinction in the Treatment of Food Selectivity in a Young Child with Autism

    Jonathan Tarbox;Averil Schiff;Adel C. Najdowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis R. Dixon
Dennis R. Dixon Center for Autism and Related Disorders
Thomas S. Higbee
Thomas S. Higbee Utah State University
Peter Sturmey
Peter Sturmey Queens College, CUNY
Mark R. Dixon
Mark R. Dixon University of Illinois at Chicago
Bryan Roche
Bryan Roche National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Louise McHugh
Louise McHugh University College Dublin
Johnny L. Matson
Johnny L. Matson Louisiana State University
Jennifer R. Zarcone
Jennifer R. Zarcone Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially when combined with related fields like social work. Many students consider pursuing social work degrees due to overlapping skills such as counseling, advocacy, and case management. With the increasing popularity of remote learning, numerous accredited institutions now offer online options across the country.

If you are based in New Hampshire, you may be interested in exploring the top online social work degrees in New Hampshire. Similarly, those located in Ohio can benefit from reviewing the top online social work programs in Ohio. In Texas, students have access to the top online social work degrees in Texas, which provide a flexible way to build expertise from anywhere in the state.

For a broader perspective, national rankings highlight the best online social work programs in the US. Graduates from these programs are well-prepared to enter community services, mental health, school counseling, and other roles where psychology and social work knowledge intersect.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Tarbox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles