World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9124 8526 4838 4405 78 7028

Joan N. Kaderavek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joan N. Kaderavek between 1993 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joan N. Kaderavek published across 29 years, from 1993 to 2021, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2004. 4 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2004. 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 8 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication
1993 2021

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joan N. Kaderavek: publications per year, 1993 to 2021
Year Publications
1993 3
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 4
2003 1
2004 8
2005 3
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 4
2010 6
2011 3
2012 7
2013 3
2014 5
2015 4
2016 8
2017 3
2018 1
2019 3
2020 3
2021 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Joan N. Kaderavek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan N. Kaderavek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 78
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joan N. Kaderavek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan N. Kaderavek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joan N. Kaderavek is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research primarily spans fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a particular focus on education and developmental areas.

The main fields of study for Kaderavek include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Their work further delves into several subfields such as:

  • Education
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Kaderavek's research covers various topics, reflecting a focus on early childhood and educational development:

  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments

Among the documented publications, Kaderavek has contributed to the following papers:

  • Longitudinal impact of early childhood science instruction on 5th grade science achievement, 2020, International Journal of Science Education
  • Caregiver Intervention Implementation Fidelity: An Empirical Investigation of a Multidimensional Model, 2021, Journal of Early Intervention

The frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • International Journal of Science Education
  • Journal of Early Intervention

Kaderavek has collaborated with multiple co-authors, indicating interdisciplinary contributions, including with:

  • Peter Paprzycki
  • Charlene M. Czerniak
  • Susanna Hapgood
  • Gale Mentzer
  • Scott C. Molitor

Best Publications

  • Relations among Preschool Teachers' Self-Efficacy, Classroom Quality, and Children's Language and Literacy Gains.

    Ying Guo;Shayne B. Piasta;Laura M. Justice;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • Accelerating preschoolers' early literacy development through classroom-based teacher-child storybook reading and explicit print referencing

    Laura M. Justice;Joan N. Kaderavek;Xitao Fan;Amy Sofka

  • The index of narrative microstructure: a clinical tool for analyzing school-age children's narrative performances.

    Laura M. Justice;Ryan P. Bowles;Joan N. Kaderavek;Teresa A. Ukrainetz

  • Preschool teachers’ literal and inferential questions and children's responses during whole-class shared reading

    Tricia A. Zucker;Laura M. Justice;Shayne B. Piasta;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • The Role of Frequent, Interactive Prekindergarten Shared Reading in the Longitudinal Development of Language and Literacy Skills

    Tricia A. Zucker;Sonia Q. Cabell;Laura M. Justice;Jill M. Pentimonti

  • Increasing Young Children’s Contact With Print During Shared Reading: Longitudinal Effects on Literacy Achievement

    Shayne B. Piasta;Laura M. Justice;Anita S. McGinty;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention I: Background and description of approach.

    Laura M. Justice;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • Narrative production by children with and without specific language impairment: oral narratives and emergent readings.

    Joan N. Kaderavek;Elizabeth Sulzby

  • Using Shared Storybook Reading to Promote Emergent Literacy

    Laura M. Justice;Joan Kaderavek

  • Shared Storybook Reading as an Intervention Context

    Joan Kaderavek;Laura M. Justice

  • The Development of Expressive Elaboration in Fictional Narratives

    Teresa A. Ukrainetz;Laura M. Justice;Joan N. Kaderavek;Sarita L. Eisenberg

  • Peer Effects in Early Childhood Education Testing the Assumptions of Special-Education Inclusion

    Laura M. Justice;Jessica A. R. Logan;Tzu-Jung Lin;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • The literacy environment of preschool classrooms: contributions to children's emergent literacy growth

    Ying Guo;Laura M. Justice;Joan N. Kaderavek;Anita McGinty

  • Print-focused read-alouds in preschool classrooms: intervention effectiveness and moderators of child outcomes.

    Laura M. Justice;Anita S. McGinty;Shayne B. Piasta;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • Fidelity: an essential component of evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology.

    Joan N. Kaderavek;Laura M. Justice

  • Informational Text Use in Preschool Classroom Read‐Alouds

    Jill M. Pentimonti;Tricia A. Zucker;Laura M. Justice;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • Language Impairment, Parent—Child Shared Reading, and Phonological Awareness: A Feasibility Study

    Laura M. Justice;Joan Kaderavek;Ryan Bowles;Kevin Grimm

  • Does intensity matter? Preschoolers’ print knowledge development within a classroom-based intervention

    Anita S. McGinty;Allison Breit-Smith;Xitao Fan;Laura M. Justice

  • Effective behavior management in preschool classrooms and children's task orientation: Enhancing emergent literacy and language development ☆

    Jennifer Dobbs-Oates;Joan N. Kaderavek;Ying Guo;Laura M. Justice

  • Noun Phrase Elaboration in Children's Spoken Stories

    Sarita L. Eisenberg;Teresa A. Ukrainetz;Jennifer R. Hsu;Joan N. Kaderavek

  • Test of Narrative Language

    Joan N. Kaderavek;Ronald B. Gillam;Teresa A. Ukrainetz;Laura M. Justice

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura M. Justice
Laura M. Justice The Ohio State University
Shayne B. Piasta
Shayne B. Piasta The Ohio State University
Ronald B. Gillam
Ronald B. Gillam Utah State University
Xitao Fan
Xitao Fan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ryan P. Bowles
Ryan P. Bowles Michigan State University
Kevin J. Grimm
Kevin J. Grimm Arizona State University
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
Christopher Schatschneider
Christopher Schatschneider Florida State University
Yaacov Petscher
Yaacov Petscher Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career opportunities in Social Sciences and Humanities has never been more accessible, thanks to diverse online degree pathways. Today’s students can fast-track their education by choosing 1 year masters programs in fields like psychology, education, or public administration. These programs are designed for motivated learners aiming to advance their credentials quickly.

For those seeking an undergraduate credential, accelerated online degrees offer a way to finish a bachelor’s program faster than the traditional route. This option is ideal for students who want to enter the workforce or pursue graduate studies sooner.

Social work remains a popular field, with numerous affordable msw programs online available. These programs provide important skills for those passionate about advocacy, counseling, and supporting diverse communities.

Mental health and behavioral analysis careers are also in demand. If you're interested in specialized roles, there are bcba certification programs offered online that prepare graduates for board certification and rewarding careers in behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Joan N. Kaderavek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles