What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Climate change
- Global warming
- Carbon dioxide
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ice core, Oceanography, Environmental science, Glacial period and Ice sheet.
His studies deal with areas such as Paleoclimatology, European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica, Atmospheric sciences, Interglacial and Atmospheric methane as well as Ice core.
His Oceanography research incorporates elements of Ice age, Climatology and Paleontology.
His Environmental science study overlaps with Ice cap climate, Antarctic Cold Reversal and Climate change.
His Glacial period research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Quaternary, Physical geography and Holocene.
The Ice sheet study combines topics in areas such as Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere and Ice-sheet model.
His most cited work include:
- Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica (4766 citations)
- Eight glacial cycles from an Antarctic ice core (1672 citations)
- Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years (1418 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Ice core, Climatology, Environmental science, Glacial period and Ice sheet.
Oceanography covers Dominique Raynaud research in Ice core.
His research integrates issues of Last Glacial Maximum and Groenlandia in his study of Climatology.
His studies in Glacial period integrate themes in fields like Quaternary and Physical geography.
His study on Ice sheet also encompasses disciplines like
- European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica that intertwine with fields like Dome,
- Ice stream, which have a strong connection to Ice shelf.
His Paleoclimatology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Marine isotope stage, Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere, Pleistocene and Temperature record.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ice core (72.17%)
- Climatology (40.00%)
- Environmental science (30.43%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?
- Ice core (72.17%)
- Climatology (40.00%)
- Glacial period (28.70%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ice core, Climatology, Glacial period, Paleontology and Interglacial.
Ice core is a subfield of Oceanography that Dominique Raynaud tackles.
The various areas that Dominique Raynaud examines in his Climatology study include Sea level, Climate change, Paleoclimatology and Holocene.
His Sea level research incorporates elements of Glacier and Atmospheric sciences, Mixing ratio.
His work on Deglaciation and Milankovitch cycles as part of general Glacial period research is often related to Climate state, thus linking different fields of science.
His Ice sheet course of study focuses on Ice-sheet model and Greenland ice sheet and Eemian.
Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Eemian interglacial reconstructed from a Greenland folded ice core (419 citations)
- An optimized multi-proxy, multi-site Antarctic ice and gas orbital chronology (AICC2012): 120--800 ka (231 citations)
- Interglacials of the last 800,000 years (197 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Climate change
- Global warming
- Carbon dioxide
His primary areas of study are Climatology, Ice core, Climate change, Interglacial and Milankovitch cycles.
His Ice core research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Paleontology, Greenland ice core project, Greenland ice sheet, Ice-sheet model and Eemian.
His research in Paleontology intersects with topics in Ice stream and Geomorphology, Ice sheet.
His Global warming study in the realm of Climate change connects with subjects such as Environmental science and Hot Temperature.
Interglacial is the subject of his research, which falls under Glacial period.
Dominique Raynaud interconnects Ice-sheet dynamics, Paleoclimatology, Pleistocene and Forcing in the investigation of issues within Milankovitch cycles.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
