World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
25586
World Ranking
14193
National Ranking
7186

David W. Newell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Newell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 239 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David W. Newell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Newell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Newell is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and specializes in the field of Medicine with a focus on Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Their research spans several subfields and involves collaboration with multiple co-authors.

Their recent publications include work related to neurological and biomedical engineering topics. Key papers authored or co-authored by Newell include:

  • Transcranial volumetric imaging using a conformal ultrasound patch, 2024, published in Nature
  • Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves, 2022, published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • Use of the Coupler Microanastomotic Device for the Treatment of a Distal Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm Via Excision and End-to-End Anastomosis-A Case Report, 2020, published in Neurosurgery Practice

Frequent co-authors in Newell's research include Sai Zhou, Xiaoxiang Gao, Geonho Park, Xinyi Yang, and Baiyan Qi.

Newell's work has been published in venues such as Nature, Frontiers in Neurology, and Neurosurgery Practice.

The main topics of Newell's research work cover:

  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Brain Trauma Foundation.

    R. Bullock;R. M. Chesnut;G. Clifton;J. Ghajar

  • Surgical Management of Acute Subdural Hematomas

    M. Ross Bullock;Randall Chesnut;Jamshid Ghajar;Jamshid Ghajar;David Gordon

  • Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Measurements

    Frank P. Tiecks;Arthur M. Lam;Rune Aaslid;David W. Newell

  • Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    M. A. Sloan;M. A. Sloan;Andrei Alexandrov;C. H. Tegeler;M. P. Spencer

  • Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria.

    William M. Coplin;David J. Pierson;Kathy D. Cooley;David W. Newell

  • Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies

    Kyra J. Becker;A. B. Baxter;W. A. Cohen;H. M. Bybee

  • Comparison of flow and velocity during dynamic autoregulation testing in humans.

    D. W. Newell;Rune Aaslid;A. Lam;T. S. Mayberg

  • Dynamic and Static Cerebral Autoregulation During Isoflurane, Desflurane, and Propofol Anesthesia

    S. Strebel;A. M. Lam;B. Matta;T. S. Mayberg

  • Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases

    P D Le Roux;J P Elliott;D W Newell;M S Grady

  • Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds.

    Susan L. Bratton;Randall M. Chestnut;Jamshid Ghajar;Flora F. McConnell Hammond

  • Valproate therapy for prevention of posttraumatic seizures: a randomized trial

    N R Temkin;S S Dikmen;G D Anderson;A J Wilensky

  • Surgical management of traumatic parenchymal lesions

    M. Ross Bullock;Randall Chesnut;Jamshid Ghajar;David Gordon

  • Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas.

    M. Ross Bullock;Randall Chesnut;Jamshid Ghajar;David Gordon

  • Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial

    Nancy R Temkin;Gail D Anderson;H Richard Winn;H Richard Winn;Richard G Ellenbogen

  • VI. Indications for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

    Susan L. Bratton;Randall M. Chestnut;Jamshid Ghajar;Flora F. McConnell Hammond

  • I. Blood Pressure and Oxygenation

    Susan L. Bratton;Randall M. Chestnut;Jamshid Ghajar;Flora F. McConnell Hammond

  • Angioplasty for the treatment of symptomatic vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    D W Newell;J M Eskridge;M R Mayberg;M S Grady

  • Assessment of cerebral autoregulation dynamics from simultaneous arterial and venous transcranial Doppler recordings in humans.

    R Aaslid;D W Newell;R Stooss;W Sorteberg

  • Cerebral autoregulation following minor head injury

    E C Jünger;D W Newell;G A Grant;A M Avellino

  • IX. Cerebral Perfusion Thresholds

    Susan L. Bratton;Randall M. Chestnut;Jamshid Ghajar;Flora F. McConnell Hammond

Frequent Co-Authors

Jamshid Ghajar
Jamshid Ghajar Stanford University
Susan L. Bratton
Susan L. Bratton University of Utah
Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
Sureyya Dikmen
Sureyya Dikmen University of Washington
Nancy R. Temkin
Nancy R. Temkin University of Washington
Howard Yonas
Howard Yonas University of New Mexico
Michael T. Lawton
Michael T. Lawton Barrow Neurological Institute
Gary K. Steinberg
Gary K. Steinberg Stanford University
Matthew A. Howard
Matthew A. Howard University of Iowa
Harold P. Adams
Harold P. Adams University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to medicine can open various flexible pathways beyond traditional medical school. Many students consider online healthcare degrees as a stepping stone, allowing them to enter high-demand fields quickly.

For those interested in advanced nursing, online direct entry msn programs offer a fast track for non-nurses to earn a graduate-level nursing degree. This option is ideal for career switchers seeking leadership and clinical roles.

Others may opt for more accessible entryways, such as adn programs, which provide associate-level credentials and are often less competitive to enter. Such programs help quickly start a nursing career.

If you are drawn to healthcare administration, accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid offer online options to develop in-demand skills while minimizing financial barriers.

Finally, students concerned about entrance exams can explore nursing school no entrance exam opportunities, helping reduce stress during the application process.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Newell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles