World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
23784
World Ranking
12897
National Ranking
5491

Darlene Groth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darlene Groth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 83 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Darlene Groth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darlene Groth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Darlene Groth is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research interests lie primarily within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant focus on subfields such as Molecular Biology and Genetics.

The main topics addressed in their work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding as well as Animal Genetics and Reproduction. These areas reflect a concentration on understanding molecular mechanisms underlying disease processes and genetic factors influencing animal biology.

Groth has contributed to academic literature with publications in recognized venues. Notably, their recent paper titled Genes contributing to prion pathogenesis, published in 2020 in UNC Libraries, examines genetic components involved in prion-related disorders.

Their collaborative efforts include frequent co-authorship with several researchers:

  • Gültekin Tamgüney
  • Kurt Giles
  • David V. Glidden
  • Pierre Lessard
  • Holger Wille

Groth's work has appeared predominantly in UNC Libraries, the publication venue associated with their known research output.

Best Publications

  • Conversion of alpha-helices into beta-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins.

    K M Pan;M Baldwin;J Nguyen;M Gasset

  • Eight prion strains have PrP Sc molecules with different conformations

    Jiri Safar;Holger Wille;Vincenza Itri;Darlene Groth

  • Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods

    Stanley B. Prusiner;Michael P. McKinley;Karen A. Bowman;David C. Bolton

  • Scrapie and cellular PrP isoforms are encoded by the same chromosomal gene

    K. Basler;B. Oesch;M. Scott;D. Westaway

  • Transgenetic studies implicate interactions between homologous PrP isoforms in scrapie prion replication.

    Stanley B. Prusiner;Michael Scott;Dallas Foster;Keh-Ming Pan

  • Transgenic mice expressing hamster prion protein produce species-specific scrapie infectivity and amyloid plaques

    Michael Scott;Dallas Foster;Carol Mirenda;Dan Serban

  • Structure of the recombinant full-length hamster prion protein PrP(29-231): the N terminus is highly flexible.

    Donne Dg;Viles Jh;Groth D;Mehlhorn I

  • Spontaneous neurodegeneration in transgenic mice with mutant prion protein.

    Karen K. Hsiao;Michael Scott;Dallas Foster;Darlene F. Groth

  • Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies

    Stanley B. Prusiner;Darlene Groth;Ana Serban;Ruth Koehler

  • Purification and structural studies of a major scrapie prion protein

    Stanley B. Prusiner;Darlene F. Groth;David C. Bolton;Stephen B. Kent

  • Further purification and characterization of scrapie prions

    S B Prusiner;D C Bolton;D F Groth;K A Bowman

  • Solution structure of a 142-residue recombinant prion protein corresponding to the infectious fragment of the scrapie isoform.

    Thomas L. James;He Liu;Nikolai B. Ulyanov;Shauna Farr-Jones

  • Measurement of the scrapie agent using an incubation time interval assay

    Stanley B. Prusiner;S. Patricia Cochran;Darlene F. Groth;Deborah E. Downey

  • Propagation of prions with artificial properties in transgenic mice expressing chimeric PrP genes.

    Michael Scott;Darlene Groth;Dallas Foster;Marilyn Torchia

  • Diversity of oligosaccharide structures linked to asparagines of the scrapie prion protein.

    Tamao Endo;Darlene Groth;Stanley B. Prusiner;Akira Kobata

  • Transmissible and genetic prion diseases share a common pathway of neurodegeneration

    Ramanujan S. Hegde;Patrick Tremblay;Darlene Groth;Stephen J. DeArmond

  • Degeneration of skeletal muscle, peripheral nerves, and the central nervous system in transgenic mice overexpressing wild-type prion proteins.

    David Westaway;Stephen J. DeArmond;Juliana Cayetano-Canlas;Darlene Groth

  • Serial transmission in rodents of neurodegeneration from transgenic mice expressing mutant prion protein

    Karen K. Hsiao;Darlene Groth;Michael Scott;Shu Lian Yang

  • Glycosylation differences between the normal and pathogenic prion protein isoforms.

    Pauline M. Rudd;Tama Endo;Cristina Colominas;Darlene Groth

  • Asparagine-linked glycosylation of the scrapie and cellular prion proteins.

    Tokuko Haraguchi;Susan Fisher;Sigvard Olofsson;Tamao Endo

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley B. Prusiner
Stanley B. Prusiner University of California, San Francisco
Stephen J. DeArmond
Stephen J. DeArmond University of California, San Francisco
Fred E. Cohen
Fred E. Cohen University of California, San Francisco
George A. Carlson
George A. Carlson University of California, San Francisco
Michael A. Baldwin
Michael A. Baldwin University of California, San Francisco
Holger Wille
Holger Wille University of Alberta
Detlev Riesner
Detlev Riesner Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Ramanujan S. Hegde
Ramanujan S. Hegde MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Jörg Tatzelt
Jörg Tatzelt Ruhr University Bochum
Tomas Hökfelt
Tomas Hökfelt Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Darlene Groth

Recently Published Articles