World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel P. Grosvenor

Daniel P. Grosvenor

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
5034
World Ranking
9432
National Ranking
701

Daniel P. Grosvenor publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Grosvenor sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel P. Grosvenor D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Grosvenor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel P. Grosvenor is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research centers on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a particular focus on subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Earth-Surface Processes, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric ozone and climate, climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, and air quality and health impacts.

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • K. S. Carslaw
  • Paul R. Field
  • Hamish Gordon
  • Florent Malavelle
  • Nathan Luke Abraham

Their publications are commonly found in several key venues, notably:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Nature Geoscience
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Nature Communications
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel P. Grosvenor include:

  • Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations (2020, Geoscientific model development)
  • The hemispheric contrast in cloud microphysical properties constrains aerosol forcing (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Opportunistic experiments to constrain aerosol effective radiative forcing (2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • Robust evidence for reversal of the trend in aerosol effective climate forcing (2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • Machine learning reveals climate forcing from aerosols is dominated by increased cloud cover (2022, Nature Geoscience)

Best Publications

  • Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives

    Daniel P. Grosvenor;Odran Sourdeval;Paquita Zuidema;Andrew Ackerman

  • Strong control of Southern Ocean cloud reflectivity by ice-nucleating particles.

    Jesús Vergara-Temprado;Annette K. Miltenberger;Kalli Furtado;Daniel P. Grosvenor;Daniel P. Grosvenor

  • Strong constraints on aerosol–cloud interactions from volcanic eruptions

    Florent F. Malavelle;Jim M. Haywood;Jim M. Haywood;Andy Jones;Andrew Gettelman

  • Natural aerosols explain seasonal and spatial patterns of Southern Ocean cloud albedo

    Daniel T. McCoy;Susannah M. Burrows;Robert Wood;Daniel P. Grosvenor

  • Improved aerosol processes and effective radiative forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1

    J. P. Mulcahy;C. Jones;A. Sellar;B. Johnson

  • The effect of solar zenith angle on MODIS cloud optical and microphysical retrievals within marine liquid water clouds

    D. P. Grosvenor;D. P. Grosvenor;R. Wood

  • Tropospheric clouds in Antarctica

    David H. Bromwich;Julien P. Nicolas;Keith M. Hines;Jennifer E. Kay

  • Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations

    Jane P. Mulcahy;Colin Johnson;Colin Johnson;Colin G. Jones;Adam C. Povey

  • Mixed‐phase cloud physics and Southern Ocean cloud feedback in climate models

    Daniel T. McCoy;Dennis L. Hartmann;Mark D. Zelinka;Paulo Ceppi;Paulo Ceppi

  • Robust evidence for reversal of the trend in aerosol effective climate forcing

    Unknown

  • The hemispheric contrast in cloud microphysical properties constrains aerosol forcing

    Isabel L. McCoy;Daniel T. McCoy;Robert Wood;Leighton Regayre

  • Machine learning reveals climate forcing from aerosols is dominated by increased cloud cover

    Unknown

  • The global aerosol-cloud first indirect effect estimated using MODIS, MERRA and AeroCom

    D. T. Mccoy;D. T. Mccoy;Frida A. M. Bender;J. K. C. Mohrmann;D. L. Hartmann

  • Opportunistic experiments to constrain aerosol effective radiative forcing

    Unknown

  • A study of the effect of overshooting deep convection on the water content of the TTL and lower stratosphere from Cloud Resolving Model simulations

    D. P. Grosvenor;T. W. Choularton;H. Coe;G. Held

  • Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic

    Hamish Gordon;Paul R. Field;Paul R. Field;Steven J. Abel;Mohit Dalvi

  • Observed Southern Ocean Cloud Properties and Shortwave Reflection. Part II: Phase Changes and Low Cloud Feedback*

    Daniel T. McCoy;Dennis L. Hartmann;Daniel P. Grosvenor

  • Chemistry-albedo feedbacks offset up to a third of forestation’s CO <sub>2</sub> removal benefits

    Unknown

  • The relative importance of macrophysical and cloud albedo changes for aerosol-induced radiative effects in closed-cell stratocumulus: insight from the modelling of a case study

    Daniel P. Grosvenor;Paul R. Field;Paul R. Field;Adrian A. Hill;Benjamin J. Shipway

  • Predicting decadal trends in cloud droplet number concentration using reanalysis and satellite data

    Daniel T. McCoy;Frida A.-M. Bender;Daniel P. Grosvenor;Johannes K. Mohrmann

  • Recent multivariate changes in the North Atlantic climate system, with a focus on 2005–2016

    Jon Robson;Rowan T. Sutton;Alex Archibald;Fenwick Cooper

  • Observed Southern Ocean Cloud Properties and Shortwave Reflection. Part I: Calculation of SW Flux from Observed Cloud Properties*

    Daniel T. McCoy;Dennis L. Hartmann;Daniel P. Grosvenor

  • Opportunistic Experiments to Constrain Aerosol Effective Radiative Forcing

    Matthew Christensen;Matthew Christensen;Andrew Gettelman;Jan Cermak;Guy Dagan

  • Strong control of Southern Ocean cloud reflectivity by ice-nucleating particles

    Jesús Vergara Temprado;Annette Miltenberger;Kalli Furtado;Daniel Grosvenor

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Field
Paul R. Field Met Office
Kenneth S. Carslaw
Kenneth S. Carslaw University of Leeds
Robert Wood
Robert Wood University of Washington
Dennis L. Hartmann
Dennis L. Hartmann University of Washington
Anja Schmidt
Anja Schmidt University of Cambridge
Ben Johnson
Ben Johnson Met Office
Philip Stier
Philip Stier University of Oxford
Thomas Choularton
Thomas Choularton University of Manchester
Andrew Gettelman
Andrew Gettelman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Michael S. Diamond
Michael S. Diamond Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can open up additional career pathways. For example, an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions and social dynamics impacting environmental policies.

Educators seeking to advance their qualifications might explore edd without dissertation options, which focus on practical leadership skills without the extended research commitment. Additionally, bridge programs like eds to edd bridge programs online offer a streamlined path for current EdD students to expand into doctoral-level expertise, ideal for environmental education professionals looking to impact curriculum or policy.

For those interested in social work's intersection with environmental justice, online dsw programs provide advanced training that can help address ecological and community health challenges from a social services perspective. Exploring these related degree options can enhance career flexibility in an evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Grosvenor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles