World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1537 1437 652 595 118 14376

Dan J. Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dan J. Kim between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dan J. Kim published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 13 of the 179 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
1998 2025

179 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dan J. Kim: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 5
2006 2
2007 7
2008 9
2009 8
2010 7
2011 8
2012 3
2013 5
2014 7
2015 14
2016 12
2017 11
2018 15
2019 7
2020 16
2021 14
2022 3
2023 4
2024 6
2025 7
Total 179
Download as CSV

Dan J. Kim publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 115–119 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 118 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97 118
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Dan J. Kim D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Dan J. Kim is affiliated with the University of North Texas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the domains of Social Sciences and Computer Science, with a significant number of publications spanning various related subfields.

The main areas of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science

Within these broad fields, their work often intersects specific subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Marketing

The topics covered in Dan J. Kim's research reflect interests in technology and its impacts, including:

  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

They have contributed papers to several academic journals with repeated publications in these venues:

  • Decision Support Systems
  • Information & Management
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Behaviour and Information Technology
  • Information Systems Frontiers

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "An empirical study of community cohesiveness, community attachment, and their roles in virtual community participation" (2022), European Journal of Information Systems
  • "How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda" (2020), Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
  • "Higher Education Amidst COVID-19: Challenges and Silver Lining" (2020), Information Systems Management
  • "Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users' privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory" (2020), Decision Support Systems
  • "Does Emotional Intelligence of Online Shoppers Affect Their Shopping Behavior? From a Cognitive-Affective-Conative Framework Perspective" (2020), International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Throughout their career, Dan J. Kim has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Sarbottam Bhagat
  • Se Hun Lim
  • Debalina Bera
  • Obi Ogbanufe
  • Reza Mousavi

Their research reflects an integration of social scientific approaches with information systems and technology studies, addressing various dimensions of user behavior, privacy concerns, and digital economy dynamics within both academic and practical frameworks.

Best Publications

  • A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents

    Dan J. Kim;Donald L. Ferrin;H. Raghav Rao

  • Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration

    Dan J. Kim;Donald L. Ferrin;H. Raghav Rao

  • A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN)

    Young Hoon Kim;Dan J. Kim;Kathy Wachter

  • Customer self-service systems: The effects of perceived Web quality with service contents on enjoyment, anxiety, and e-trust

    Yujong Hwang;Dan J. Kim

  • Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments

    Yulia W. Sullivan;Dan J. Kim

  • A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: a conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives

    Dan J. Kim;Yong I. Song;S. B. Braynov;H. R. Rao

  • Self-Perception-Based Versus Transference-Based Trust Determinants in Computer-Mediated Transactions: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study

    Dan Kim

  • A Meta-Analytical Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies

    Constantinos K. Coursaris;Dan J. Kim

  • An Empirical Study of the Impacts of Perceived Security and Knowledge on Continuous Intention to Use Mobile Fintech Payment Services

    Se Hun Lim;Dan J. Kim;Yeon Hur;Kunsu Park

  • An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and post-expectation

    Dan J. Kim

  • Revisiting the role of web assurance seals in business-to-consumer electronic commerce

    Dan J. Kim;Charles Steinfield;Ying-Ju Lai

  • A study of mobile internet user's service quality perceptions from a user's utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives

    Dan J. Kim;Yujong Hwang

  • A Study of Online Transaction Self-Efficacy, Consumer Trust, and Uncertainty Reduction in Electronic Commerce Transaction

    Young Hoon Kim;D.J. Kim

  • A chronological review of empirical research on personal information privacy concerns: An analysis of contexts and research constructs

    Haejung Yun;Gwanhoo Lee;Dan J Kim

  • Understanding Affective Commitment, Collectivist Culture, and Social Influence in Relation to Knowledge Sharing in Technology Mediated Learning

    Yujong Hwang;D.J. Kim

  • Global Diffusion of the Internet XV: Web 2.0 Technologies, Principles, and Applications: A Conceptual Framework from Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspective

    Dan J. Kim;Kwok-Bun Yue;Sharon Perkins Hall;Tracy Gates

  • A comparison of B2B e-service solutions

    Dan Jong Kim;Manish Agrawal;Bharat Jayaraman;H. Raghav Rao

  • A Qualitative Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies

    Constantinos K. Coursaris;Dan J. Kim

  • Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users' privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory

    Reza Mousavi;Rui Chen;Dan J. Kim;Kuanchin Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

H. Raghav Rao
H. Raghav Rao The University of Texas at San Antonio
Yujong Hwang
Yujong Hwang DePaul University
Chulmo Koo
Chulmo Koo Kyung Hee University
Namho Chung
Namho Chung Kyung Hee University
Sherry D. Ryan
Sherry D. Ryan University of North Texas
Charles Steinfield
Charles Steinfield Michigan State University
Mark A. Pitt
Mark A. Pitt The Ohio State University
Robert S. Siegler
Robert S. Siegler Columbia University
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
Lee A. Thompson
Lee A. Thompson Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Business and Management opens up many flexible online study options. Many professionals are now exploring degrees that fit around their schedules and fit different budgets. For those interested in the building industry, online construction management degrees provide specialized skills in project planning, leadership, and site management.

A popular route for career advancement is pursuing an MBA. For working adults seeking affordable education, exploring a cheap online mba allows you to gain valuable managerial skills without high tuition costs. Beyond business, students can benefit from investigating the cheapest masters degrees across different fields, helping minimize debt while maximizing career prospects.

As data-driven decision-making becomes more important, degrees like the best data science master's programs are attracting those aiming for roles in business analytics. Choosing the right online program ensures flexibility, affordability, and a strong return on your educational investment.

Best Scientists Citing Dan J. Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles