World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
41
Citations
14376
World Ranking
1537
National Ranking
652

Dan J. Kim publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 118 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Dan J. Kim D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan J. Kim sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dan J. Kim is affiliated with the University of North Texas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the domains of Social Sciences and Computer Science, with a significant number of publications spanning various related subfields.

The main areas of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science

Within these broad fields, their work often intersects specific subfields such as:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Marketing

The topics covered in Dan J. Kim's research reflect interests in technology and its impacts, including:

  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

They have contributed papers to several academic journals with repeated publications in these venues:

  • Decision Support Systems
  • Information & Management
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Behaviour and Information Technology
  • Information Systems Frontiers

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "An empirical study of community cohesiveness, community attachment, and their roles in virtual community participation" (2022), European Journal of Information Systems
  • "How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda" (2020), Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
  • "Higher Education Amidst COVID-19: Challenges and Silver Lining" (2020), Information Systems Management
  • "Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users' privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory" (2020), Decision Support Systems
  • "Does Emotional Intelligence of Online Shoppers Affect Their Shopping Behavior? From a Cognitive-Affective-Conative Framework Perspective" (2020), International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Throughout their career, Dan J. Kim has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Sarbottam Bhagat
  • Se Hun Lim
  • Debalina Bera
  • Obi Ogbanufe
  • Reza Mousavi

Their research reflects an integration of social scientific approaches with information systems and technology studies, addressing various dimensions of user behavior, privacy concerns, and digital economy dynamics within both academic and practical frameworks.

Best Publications

  • A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents

    Dan J. Kim;Donald L. Ferrin;H. Raghav Rao

  • Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration

    Dan J. Kim;Donald L. Ferrin;H. Raghav Rao

  • A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN)

    Young Hoon Kim;Dan J. Kim;Kathy Wachter

  • Customer self-service systems: The effects of perceived Web quality with service contents on enjoyment, anxiety, and e-trust

    Yujong Hwang;Dan J. Kim

  • Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments

    Yulia W. Sullivan;Dan J. Kim

  • A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: a conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives

    Dan J. Kim;Yong I. Song;S. B. Braynov;H. R. Rao

  • How Should We Understand the Digital Economy in Asia? Critical Assessment and Research Agenda.

    Kai Li;Dan J. Kim;Karl Reiner Lang;Robert J. Kauffman

  • Self-Perception-Based Versus Transference-Based Trust Determinants in Computer-Mediated Transactions: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study

    Dan Kim

  • A Meta-Analytical Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies

    Constantinos K. Coursaris;Dan J. Kim

  • An Empirical Study of the Impacts of Perceived Security and Knowledge on Continuous Intention to Use Mobile Fintech Payment Services

    Se Hun Lim;Dan J. Kim;Yeon Hur;Kunsu Park

  • An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and post-expectation

    Dan J. Kim

  • Revisiting the role of web assurance seals in business-to-consumer electronic commerce

    Dan J. Kim;Charles Steinfield;Ying-Ju Lai

  • A study of mobile internet user's service quality perceptions from a user's utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives

    Dan J. Kim;Yujong Hwang

  • A Study of Online Transaction Self-Efficacy, Consumer Trust, and Uncertainty Reduction in Electronic Commerce Transaction

    Young Hoon Kim;D.J. Kim

  • A chronological review of empirical research on personal information privacy concerns: An analysis of contexts and research constructs

    Haejung Yun;Gwanhoo Lee;Dan J Kim

  • Higher Education Amidst COVID-19: Challenges and Silver Lining

    Sarbottam Bhagat;Dan J. Kim

  • Understanding Affective Commitment, Collectivist Culture, and Social Influence in Relation to Knowledge Sharing in Technology Mediated Learning

    Yujong Hwang;D.J. Kim

  • Global Diffusion of the Internet XV: Web 2.0 Technologies, Principles, and Applications: A Conceptual Framework from Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspective

    Dan J. Kim;Kwok-Bun Yue;Sharon Perkins Hall;Tracy Gates

  • A comparison of B2B e-service solutions

    Dan Jong Kim;Manish Agrawal;Bharat Jayaraman;H. Raghav Rao

  • A Qualitative Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies

    Constantinos K. Coursaris;Dan J. Kim

  • Effectiveness of privacy assurance mechanisms in users' privacy protection on social networking sites from the perspective of protection motivation theory

    Reza Mousavi;Rui Chen;Dan J. Kim;Kuanchin Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

H. Raghav Rao
H. Raghav Rao The University of Texas at San Antonio
Yujong Hwang
Yujong Hwang DePaul University
Chulmo Koo
Chulmo Koo Kyung Hee University
Namho Chung
Namho Chung Kyung Hee University
Sherry D. Ryan
Sherry D. Ryan University of North Texas
Charles Steinfield
Charles Steinfield Michigan State University
Mark A. Pitt
Mark A. Pitt The Ohio State University
Robert S. Siegler
Robert S. Siegler Columbia University
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
Lee A. Thompson
Lee A. Thompson Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Business and Management opens up many flexible online study options. Many professionals are now exploring degrees that fit around their schedules and fit different budgets. For those interested in the building industry, online construction management degrees provide specialized skills in project planning, leadership, and site management.

A popular route for career advancement is pursuing an MBA. For working adults seeking affordable education, exploring a cheap online mba allows you to gain valuable managerial skills without high tuition costs. Beyond business, students can benefit from investigating the cheapest masters degrees across different fields, helping minimize debt while maximizing career prospects.

As data-driven decision-making becomes more important, degrees like the best data science master's programs are attracting those aiming for roles in business analytics. Choosing the right online program ensures flexibility, affordability, and a strong return on your educational investment.

Best Scientists Citing Dan J. Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles