What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Education
- Pedagogy
- Social science
Pedagogy, Professional development, Mathematics education, Curriculum and Teaching method are her primary areas of study.
Her specific area of interest is Pedagogy, where Ann Lieberman studies Primary education.
Her Professional development research incorporates elements of Writing instruction, Education reform and Competence.
Her study in the fields of Classroom teaching and Educational technology under the domain of Mathematics education overlaps with other disciplines such as Work and History of the United States.
She has included themes like Experiential learning, Educational standards and Action in her Curriculum study.
As a member of one scientific family, Ann Lieberman mostly works in the field of Teaching method, focusing on Professional learning community and, on occasion, Adult education and Learning organization.
Her most cited work include:
- Practices That Support Teacher Development. (777 citations)
- International Handbook of Educational Change (544 citations)
- TEACHER LEARNING: THE KEY TO EDUCATIONAL REFORM (325 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her primary areas of study are Pedagogy, Professional development, Mathematics education, Professional learning community and Public relations.
Her study in Teacher leadership, Teacher education, Educational research, Curriculum and Educational leadership is carried out as part of her Pedagogy studies.
Her Curriculum research includes elements of Action research and Social studies.
Her work on Teacher learning as part of her general Professional development study is frequently connected to Engineering ethics, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
In general Mathematics education, her work in Teaching learning and Academic achievement is often linked to Public education linking many areas of study.
Her Professional learning community study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Professional studies, Teaching method and Education reform.
She most often published in these fields:
- Pedagogy (62.37%)
- Professional development (27.96%)
- Mathematics education (26.88%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2012-2018)?
- Mathematics education (26.88%)
- Teacher learning (9.68%)
- Pedagogy (62.37%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her main research concerns Mathematics education, Teacher learning, Pedagogy, Teaching learning and Teacher leadership.
Her Mathematics education research spans across into fields like Work, CHAOS and Computer science.
Teacher learning is a subfield of Professional development that she investigates.
Her Professional studies study in the realm of Professional development interacts with subjects such as Training methods, Center and Government.
Her work on Faculty development as part of general Pedagogy research is frequently linked to Capacity building, bridging the gap between disciplines.
Her Teacher leadership study introduces a deeper knowledge of Educational leadership.
Between 2012 and 2018, her most popular works were:
- Developing professional capital in policy and practice (21 citations)
- Teacher Learning and Leadership: Of, By, and For Teachers (14 citations)
- Introduction to “Creating the Conditions for Learning: Teachers as Leaders” (6 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Education
- Pedagogy
- Social science
Her primary areas of investigation include Teacher learning, Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Professional development and Teacher leadership.
Her research integrates issues of Professional studies, Public relations and Professional learning community in her study of Teacher learning.
Pedagogy is connected with Policy making and Christian ministry in her study.
She studies Professional development, namely Faculty development.
Her Teacher leadership research is included under the broader classification of Educational leadership.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
