World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
15453
World Ranking
6564
National Ranking
3172

Alok K. Chakrabarti publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alok K. Chakrabarti sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 110 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Alok K. Chakrabarti D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alok K. Chakrabarti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alok K. Chakrabarti is affiliated with the New Jersey Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Immunology, and Modeling and Simulation. Their work addresses a variety of topics including COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Influenza virus research, bacteriophages and microbial interactions, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, COVID-19 clinical research, pneumonia and respiratory infections, as well as emergency and acute care studies.

The scientist has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Emergence of Novel Coronavirus and COVID-19: whether to stay or die out?, 2020, Critical Reviews in Microbiology
  • Covid-19 Infection in India: A Comparative Analysis of the Second Wave with the First Wave, 2021, Pathogens
  • Cohort profile: Indian Network of Population-Based Surveillance Platforms for Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses among the Elderly (INSPIRE), 2021, BMJ Open
  • Phage Therapy as a Protective Tool Against Pathogenic Bacteria: How Far We Are?, 2022, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
  • Development of lab score system for predicting COVID-19 patient severity: A retrospective analysis, 2022, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Alok K. Chakrabarti include Shanta Dutta, Devendra Nath Tewari, Uttaran Bhattacharjee, Asim Biswas, and Anand Krishnan. The scientist's research is published in several venues, with notable contributions in Viruses, BMJ Public Health, Critical Reviews in Microbiology, Pathogens, and BMJ Open.

Best Publications

  • processes of technological innovation

    Louis G. Tornatzky;Mitchell. Fleischer;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes

    Eric H. Kessler;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry

    Paul Bierly;Alok Chakrabarti

  • FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS

    Michael D. Santoro;Alok K. Chakrabarti;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use

    Magid Igbaria;Alok Chakrabarti

  • Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry: Generic Knowledge Strategies

    Paul Bierly;Alok Chakrabarti

  • The Role of Champion in Product Innovation

    Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • The role of incubator interactions in assisting new ventures

    Joanne L. Scillitoe;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Factors Influencing Innovation Success at the Project Level

    A. H. Rubenstein;A. K. Chakrabarti;R. D. O'Keefe;W. E. Souder

  • Speeding Up the Pace of New Product Development

    Eric H. Kessler;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Arbeitsteilung im Innovationsmanagement

    Jürgen Hauschildt;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Innovation and the productivity crisis

    Martin Neil Baily;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • The R&D/marketing interface: Results from an empirical study of innovation projects

    W. E. Souder;A. K. Chakrabarti

  • Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry

    P.E. Bierly;A.K. Chakrabarti

  • The division of labour in innovation management

    Alok K. Chakrabarti;Juergen Hauschildt

  • Does it pay to acquire technological firms

    Alok Chakrabarti;Jurger Hauschildt;Christian Süverkrüp

  • Building Industry–University Research Centers: Some Strategic Considerations

    Michael D. Santoro;Alok K. Chakrabarti

  • Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers

    M.D. Santoro;A.K. Chakrabarti

  • R&D/marketing linkage and innovation strategy: some West German experience

    K. Brockhoff;A.K. Chakrabarti

  • Corporate Strategies in Environmental Management

    Klaus Brockhoff;Alok K. Chakrabarti;Manfred Kirchgeorg

  • Implementing routine and radical innovations

    David A. Tansik;Alok K. Chakrabarti

Frequent Co-Authors

William E. Souder
William E. Souder University of Alabama in Huntsville
Klaus Brockhoff
Klaus Brockhoff WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management
Martin Neil Baily
Martin Neil Baily Brookings Institution
Thomas C. Chiang
Thomas C. Chiang Drexel University
Gary L. Lilien
Gary L. Lilien Pennsylvania State University
John E. Ettlie
John E. Ettlie Rochester Institute of Technology
Magid Igbaria
Magid Igbaria Claremont Graduate University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities opens doors to meaningful careers that impact individuals, families, and communities. Many students now choose flexible online programs to fit their busy lives, seeking both affordability and accredited quality.

For those interested in mental health, pursuing a cacrep online masters in counseling ensures a rigorous, recognized pathway to become a professional counselor. If your passion is helping couples and families, consider online mft programs accredited by relevant boards, which lead to licensure and specialized practice.

Students drawn to broader mental health roles often start with an affordable online psychology degree, building a foundation for various careers or further graduate studies. For those ready to advocate for social change and support vulnerable populations, selecting from the top online msw programs is a strategic step toward a versatile career in social work.

By combining accredited online education with focused career pathways, you can make significant contributions while studying at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Alok K. Chakrabarti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles