World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
51
Citations
11763
World Ranking
2492
National Ranking
1231

Tom Kadesch publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Kadesch sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Tom Kadesch D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Kadesch sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Kadesch is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on research and scholarship connected to this institution.

Details about Tom Kadesch's research papers, including titles, years of publication, venues, and citation counts, are not available at this time.

Information regarding frequent co-authors who collaborate with Tom Kadesch is also not currently documented.

No specific data about publication venues where Tom Kadesch has frequently published has been provided.

There is no available record of book publications attributed to Tom Kadesch through any publisher.

Data on the main fields of study, subfields, or topical focus areas encompassing Tom Kadesch's work has not been recorded.

There is no information available concerning awards or recognitions received by Tom Kadesch.

Best Publications

  • Notch1 expression in early lymphopoiesis influences B versus T lineage determination.

    John C Pui;David Allman;Lanwei Xu;Susan DeRocco

  • Functional activity of myogenic HLH proteins requires hetero-oligomerization with E12/E47-like proteins in vivo

    Andrew B. Lassar;Robert L. Davis;Woodring E. Wright;Tom Kadesch

  • A histone deacetylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway

    Hung Ying Kao;Peter Ordentlich;Peter Ordentlich;Peter Ordentlich;Naoko Koyano-Nakagawa;Zhenyu Tang;Zhenyu Tang

  • TFE3: a helix-loop-helix protein that activates transcription through the immunoglobulin enhancer muE3 motif.

    H. Beckmann;Li-Kuo Su;T. Kadesch

  • Two distinct transcription factors that bind the immunoglobulin enhancer microE5/kappa 2 motif

    Paula Henthorn;Megerditch Kiledjian;Tom Kadesch

  • Structure of the human liver/bone/kidney alkaline phosphatase gene.

    M. J. Weiss;K. Ray;P. S. Henthorn;Bruce Lamb

  • Inhibition of myeloid differentiation by the helix-loop-helix protein Id

    Brent L. Kreider;Robert Benezra;Giovanni Rovera;Tom Kadesch

  • Notch inhibition of E47 supports the existence of a novel signaling pathway.

    Peter Ordentlich;Arthur Lin;Chun-Pyn Shen;Chris Blaumueller

  • Consequences of heteromeric interactions among helix-loop-helix proteins.

    Tom Kadesch

  • B-cell-specific DNA binding by an E47 homodimer.

    Chu-Pyn Shen;T. Kadesch

  • Sequence and characterization of the human intestinal alkaline phosphatase gene.

    P S Henthorn;M Raducha;T Kadesch;M J Weiss

  • Displacement of an E-box-binding repressor by basic helix-loop-helix proteins: implications for B-cell specificity of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer.

    T Genetta;D Ruezinsky;T Kadesch

  • Notch signaling: the demise of elegant simplicity.

    Tom Kadesch

  • Human deltex is a conserved regulator of Notch signalling

    Kenji Matsuno;Deborah Eastman;Tim Mitsiades;Anne Marie Quinn

  • Expression of a human placental alkaline phosphatase gene in transfected cells: use as a reporter for studies of gene expression

    Paula Henthorn;Paula Zervos;Michael Raducha;Harry Harris

  • DNA binding site preferences and transcriptional activation properties of the Arabidopsis transcription factor GBF1.

    U. Schindler;W. Terzaghi;H. Beckmann;T. Kadesch

  • Dual Roles for the Notch Target Gene Hes-1 in the Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes

    David A. Ross;Prakash K. Rao;Tom Kadesch

  • Helix-loo-helix proteins in the regulation of immunoglobulin gene transcription

    Tom Kadesch

  • Repression of immunoglobulin enhancers by the helix-loop-helix protein Id: implications for B-lymphoid-cell development.

    Robert B. Wilson;Megerditch Kiledjian;Chun Pyn Shen;Robert Benezra

  • Tissue-specific gene activation by MyoD: determination of specificity by cis-acting repression elements.

    Harold Weintraub;Tom Genetta;Tom Kadesch

Frequent Co-Authors

Megerditch Kiledjian
Megerditch Kiledjian Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas Harvard University
Ronald M. Evans
Ronald M. Evans Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Ranjan Sen
Ranjan Sen National Institutes of Health
Warren S. Pear
Warren S. Pear University of Pennsylvania
Harold Weintraub
Harold Weintraub Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Jon C. Aster
Jon C. Aster Harvard Medical School
Robert Benezra
Robert Benezra Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Richard R. Hardy
Richard R. Hardy Fox Chase Cancer Center
Jennifer M. Puck
Jennifer M. Puck University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens doors to a wide range of educational and professional opportunities. Many students choose to expand their skills through flexible online programs. For example, those interested in working with individuals or communities may want to explore a human services online degree. This pathway can lead to roles in healthcare, public health, or social work.

If you’re passionate about language and communication, you might wonder, can a teacher become a speech pathologist? The answer is yes! Professionals with a science background, such as molecular biology, often transition into speech-language pathology by pursuing the necessary credentials.

Science lovers may also consider fields like design and mathematics. There are many reputable online architecture degree programs that combine creativity with scientific thinking. Similarly, if you enjoy problem-solving, pursuing one of the top online math degrees can lead to dynamic careers in research, education, or data science.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Kadesch

Recently Published Articles